Highly multiplexed, image-based pooled screens in primary cells and tissues with PerturbView

Optical pooled screening (OPS) is a highly scalable method for linking image-based phenotypes with cellular perturbations. However, it has thus far been restricted to relatively low-plex phenotypic readouts in cancer cell lines in culture, due to limitations associated with in situ sequencing (ISS) of perturbation barcodes. Here, we developed PerturbView, an OPS technology that leverages in vitro transcription (IVT) to amplify barcodes prior to ISS, enabling screens with highly multiplexed phenotypic readouts across diverse systems, including primary cells and tissues. We demonstrate PerturbView in iPSC-derived neurons, primary immune cells, and tumor tissue sections from animal models. In a screen of immune signaling pathways in primary bone marrow-derived macrophages, PerturbView uncovered both known and novel regulators of NFκB signaling. Furthermore, we combined PerturbView with spatial transcriptomics in tissue sections from a mouse xenograft model, paving the way to in vivo screens with rich optical and transcriptomic phenotypes. PerturbView broadens the scope of OPS to a wide range of models and applications.

[1]  Samouil L. Farhi,et al.  Simultaneous CRISPR screening and spatial transcriptomics reveals intracellular, intercellular, and functional transcriptional circuits , 2023, bioRxiv.

[2]  K. Dey,et al.  Scalable genetic screening for regulatory circuits using compressed Perturb-seq , 2023, Nature biotechnology.

[3]  J. Mesirov,et al.  Extending support for mouse data in the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) , 2023, Nature Methods.

[4]  Mohammad M. Sultan,et al.  A Pooled Cell Painting CRISPR Screening Platform Enables de novo Inference of Gene Function by Self-supervised Deep Learning , 2023, bioRxiv.

[5]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  A genome-wide atlas of human cell morphology , 2023, bioRxiv.

[6]  Yevgeniy V. Serebrenik,et al.  Pooled tagging and hydrophobic targeting of endogenous proteins for unbiased mapping of unfolded protein responses , 2023, bioRxiv.

[7]  N. Hacohen,et al.  A genome-wide optical pooled screen reveals regulators of cellular antiviral responses , 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  C. Zang,et al.  Perturb-tracing enables high-content screening of multiscale 3D genome regulators , 2023, bioRxiv.

[9]  Caleb K. Chan,et al.  Mapping variation in the morphological landscape of human cells with optical pooled CRISPRi screening , 2022, bioRxiv.

[10]  O. Elemento,et al.  Spatial omics technologies at multimodal and single cell/subcellular level , 2022, Genome biology.

[11]  Ramkumar Veppathur Mohan,et al.  Biological Cartography: Building and Benchmarking Representations of Life , 2022, bioRxiv.

[12]  Carolyn A. Morrison,et al.  High resolution mapping of the breast cancer tumor microenvironment using integrated single cell, spatial and in situ analysis of FFPE tissue , 2022, bioRxiv.

[13]  Aaron T. L. Lun,et al.  A comprehensive Bioconductor ecosystem for the design of CRISPR guide RNAs across nucleases and technologies , 2022, Nature Communications.

[14]  P. Blainey,et al.  Pooled genetic screens with image‐based profiling , 2022, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  S. Durinck,et al.  Population-wide gene disruption in the murine lung epithelium via AAV-mediated delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 components , 2022, Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development.

[16]  E. Lundberg,et al.  The emerging landscape of spatial profiling technologies , 2022, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[17]  Keara M. Lane,et al.  A multiplexed epitope barcoding strategy that enables dynamic cellular phenotypic screens. , 2022, Cell systems.

[18]  Eun Sug Park,et al.  Spatial CRISPR genomics identifies regulators of the tumor microenvironment , 2022, Cell.

[19]  P. Blainey,et al.  Pooled genetic perturbation screens with image-based phenotypes , 2022, Nature Protocols.

[20]  Bradley C. Lowekamp,et al.  IBEX: an iterative immunolabeling and chemical bleaching method for high-content imaging of diverse tissues , 2022, Nature Protocols.

[21]  Kuan-Chung Su,et al.  The phenotypic landscape of essential human genes , 2021, Cell.

[22]  Rohit Reja,et al.  Shigella ubiquitin ligase IpaH7.8 targets gasdermin D for degradation to prevent pyroptosis and enable infection. , 2021, Cell host & microbe.

[23]  Andrea J. Radtke,et al.  Spatial mapping of protein composition and tissue organization: a primer for multiplexed antibody-based imaging , 2021, Nature Methods.

[24]  Jeremy L. Muhlich,et al.  Stitching and registering highly multiplexed whole-slide images of tissues and tumors using ASHLAR , 2021, bioRxiv.

[25]  Jamie L. Marshall,et al.  Compressed sensing for highly efficient imaging transcriptomics , 2021, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  Mihail I. Todorov,et al.  A guidebook for DISCO tissue clearing , 2021, Molecular systems biology.

[27]  Chris Xu,et al.  Multicolor three-photon fluorescence imaging with single-wavelength excitation deep in mouse brain , 2021, Science Advances.

[28]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Image-based pooled whole-genome CRISPRi screening for subcellular phenotypes , 2021, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  Sihui Guan,et al.  Versatile phenotype-activated cell sorting , 2020, Science Advances.

[30]  Hongbo Hu,et al.  Targeting NF-κB pathway for the therapy of diseases: mechanism and clinical study , 2020, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[31]  O. Homann,et al.  Systematic comparison of high-throughput single-cell RNA-seq methods for immune cell profiling , 2020, BMC Genomics.

[32]  S. Sauer,et al.  Maximizing transcription of nucleic acids with efficient T7 promoters , 2020, Communications Biology.

[33]  Max A. Horlbeck,et al.  High-content imaging-based pooled CRISPR screens in mammalian cells , 2020, bioRxiv.

[34]  R. Monnat,et al.  High‐throughput, microscope‐based sorting to dissect cellular heterogeneity , 2020, Molecular systems biology.

[35]  Gene W. Yeo,et al.  Pooled CRISPR screens with imaging on microRaft arrays reveals stress granule-regulatory factors , 2020, Nature Methods.

[36]  W. Qasim,et al.  ‘Mini’ U6 Pol III promoter exhibits nucleosome redundancy and supports multiplexed coupling of CRISPR/Cas9 effects , 2020, Gene Therapy.

[37]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Visualizing structure and transitions in high-dimensional biological data , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  Mark W. Budde,et al.  In situ readout of DNA barcodes and single base edits facilitated by in vitro transcription , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[39]  Jonathan L. Schmid-Burgk,et al.  Optical Pooled Screens in Human Cells , 2019, Cell.

[40]  Eugene W. Myers,et al.  Star-convex Polyhedra for 3D Object Detection and Segmentation in Microscopy , 2019, 2020 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV).

[41]  X. Zhuang,et al.  Imaging-based pooled CRISPR screening reveals regulators of lncRNA localization , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Guo-Cheng Yuan,et al.  Transcriptome-scale super-resolved imaging in tissues by RNA seqFISH+ , 2019, Nature.

[43]  Bertrand Z. Yeung,et al.  Cell Hashing with barcoded antibodies enables multiplexing and doublet detection for single cell genomics , 2018, Genome Biology.

[44]  Lucas Pelkmans,et al.  Multiplexed protein maps link subcellular organization to cellular states , 2018, Science.

[45]  P. Sorger,et al.  Highly multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging of human tissues and tumors using t-CyCIF and conventional optical microscopes , 2018, eLife.

[46]  Eugene W. Myers,et al.  Cell Detection with Star-convex Polygons , 2018, MICCAI.

[47]  Lindy E. Barrett,et al.  Combining NGN2 Programming with Developmental Patterning Generates Human Excitatory Neurons with NMDAR-Mediated Synaptic Transmission , 2018, Cell reports.

[48]  Thomas M. Norman,et al.  Approaches to maximize sgRNA-barcode coupling in Perturb-seq screens , 2018, bioRxiv.

[49]  Johannes Stegmaier,et al.  Third-generation in situ hybridization chain reaction: multiplexed, quantitative, sensitive, versatile, robust , 2018, Development.

[50]  Paul C. Blainey,et al.  Lentiviral co-packaging mitigates the effects of intermolecular recombination and multiple integrations in pooled genetic screens , 2018, bioRxiv.

[51]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis , 2018, Genome Biology.

[52]  Marc Berndl,et al.  Improving Phenotypic Measurements in High-Content Imaging Screens , 2017, bioRxiv.

[53]  Nassir Navab,et al.  A BaSiC tool for background and shading correction of optical microscopy images , 2017, Nature Communications.

[54]  André F. Rendeiro,et al.  Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome read-out , 2017, Nature Methods.

[55]  I. Amit,et al.  Dissecting Immune Circuits by Linking CRISPR-Pooled Screens with Single-Cell RNA-Seq , 2016, Cell.

[56]  Thomas M. Norman,et al.  A Multiplexed Single-Cell CRISPR Screening Platform Enables Systematic Dissection of the Unfolded Protein Response , 2016, Cell.

[57]  Thomas M. Norman,et al.  Perturb-Seq: Dissecting Molecular Circuits with Scalable Single-Cell RNA Profiling of Pooled Genetic Screens , 2016, Cell.

[58]  L. O’Neill,et al.  HIF1α and metabolic reprogramming in inflammation. , 2016, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[59]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  A human neurodevelopmental model for Williams syndrome , 2016, Nature.

[60]  P. Romanienko,et al.  A Vector with a Single Promoter for In Vitro Transcription and Mammalian Cell Expression of CRISPR gRNAs , 2016, PloS one.

[61]  Chun Jimmie Ye,et al.  A Genome-wide CRISPR Screen in Primary Immune Cells to Dissect Regulatory Networks , 2015, Cell.

[62]  Robert Langer,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9 Knockin Mice for Genome Editing and Cancer Modeling , 2014, Cell.

[63]  Guohong Li,et al.  Roles of the Kinase TAK1 in CD40-Mediated Effects on Vascular Oxidative Stress and Neointima Formation after Vascular Injury , 2014, PloS one.

[64]  Neville E. Sanjana,et al.  Genome-Scale CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout Screening in Human Cells , 2014, Science.

[65]  E. Lander,et al.  Genetic Screens in Human Cells Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System , 2013, Science.

[66]  Heng Li Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM , 2013, 1303.3997.

[67]  Jay Shendure,et al.  Accurate gene synthesis with tag-directed retrieval of sequence-verified DNA molecules , 2012, Nature Methods.

[68]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Workflow and Metrics for Image Quality Control in Large-Scale High-Content Screens , 2012, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[69]  G. Wang,et al.  Quantitative production of macrophages or neutrophils ex vivo using conditional Hoxb8 , 2006, Nature Methods.

[70]  S. Akira,et al.  TAK1 Is a Component of the Epstein-Barr Virus LMP1 Complex and Is Essential for Activation of JNK but Not of NF-κB* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[71]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  Genomic Maps and Comparative Analysis of Histone Modifications in Human and Mouse , 2005, Cell.

[72]  J. Feramisco,et al.  Adenylyl Cyclase Type VI Gene Transfer Reduces Phospholamban Expression in Cardiac Myocytes via Activating Transcription Factor 3* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[73]  Joshua D. Warner,et al.  Distributed under Creative Commons Cc-by 4.0 Scikit-image: Image Processing in Python , 2022 .