Transformations and representations supporting spatial perspective taking

ABSTRACT Spatial perspective taking is the ability to reason about spatial relations relative to another’s viewpoint. Here, we propose a mechanistic hypothesis that relates mental representations of one’s viewpoint to the transformations used for spatial perspective taking. We test this hypothesis using a novel behavioral paradigm that assays patterns of response time and variation in those patterns across people. The results support the hypothesis that people maintain a schematic representation of the space around their body, update that representation to take another’s perspective, and thereby to reason about the space around their body. This is a powerful computational mechanism that can support imitation, coordination of behavior, and observational learning.

[1]  Clark C. Presson Strategies in Spatial Reasoning. , 1982 .

[2]  R. E. Parker,et al.  Memory for descriptive and spatial information in complex pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[3]  F. J. Langdon,et al.  The Child's Conception of Space , 1967 .

[4]  M. May,et al.  Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  J. Flavell,et al.  Young children's knowledge about visual perception: Further evidence for the Level 1–Level 2 distinction. , 1981 .

[6]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Neural Representations of Self versus Other: Visual-Spatial Perspective Taking and Agency in a Virtual Ball-tossing Game , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Dennis R. Proffitt,et al.  Two memories for geographical slant: Separation and interdependence of action and awareness , 1998, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Hongbin Wang,et al.  Object location memory: The interplay of multiple representations , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[9]  L M Parsons,et al.  Imagined spatial transformation of one's body. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Jean Piaget,et al.  Mental Imagery In The Child: A Study Of The Development Of Imaginal Representation , 1971 .

[11]  C. B. Cave,et al.  Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  B. Tversky,et al.  Switching points of view in spatial mental models , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Imagined Viewer and Object Rotations Dissociated with Event-Related fMRI , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  D J Bryant,et al.  Spatial Concepts and Perception of Physical and Diagrammed Scenes 1 , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  D. Halpern Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .

[16]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Searching Imagined Environments , 1990 .

[17]  R. A. Carlson,et al.  Egocentric organization of spatial activities in imagined navigation , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[18]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[20]  Pascale Michelon,et al.  Two kinds of visual perspective taking , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Transformations of visuospatial images. , 2005, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[22]  W S Maki,et al.  Processing locational and orientational information , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[23]  B. Tversky,et al.  Mental representations of perspective and spatial relations from diagrams and models. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Klaus Kessler,et al.  The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: Embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference , 2010, Cognition.

[25]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  What determines our navigational abilities? , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  B. Tversky,et al.  Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes , 1992 .

[27]  Nicholas D. Duran,et al.  The action dynamics of overcoming the truth , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  C. E. Bethell-Fox,et al.  Mental rotation: effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity , 1988 .

[29]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Multiple Systems for Spatial Imagery: Transformations of Objects and Bodies , 2005, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[30]  YU ALFREDB. The role of animacy in spatial transformations , 2010 .

[31]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Reference Frame Activation during Spatial Term Assignment , 1994 .