Effect of beam size on the expected benefit of customized laser refractive surgery.

PURPOSE Customized laser surgery attempts to correct higher order aberrations, as well as defocus and astigmatism. The success of such a procedure depends on using a laser beam that is small enough to produce fine ablation profiles needed to correct higher order aberrations. METHODS Wave aberrations were obtained from a population of 109 normal eyes and 4 keratoconic eyes using a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor. We considered a theoretical customized ablation in each eye, performed with beams of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm in diameter. We then calculated the residual aberrations remaining in the eye for the different beam sizes. Retinal image quality was estimated by means of the modulation transfer function (MTF), computed from the residual aberrations. Fourier analysis was used to study spatial filtering of each beam size. RESULTS The laser beam acts like a spatial filter, smoothing the finest features in the ablation profile. The quality of the correction declines steadily when the beam size increases. A beam of 2 mm is capable of correcting defocus and astigmatism. Beam diameters of 1 mm or less may effectively correct aberrations up to fifth order. CONCLUSION Large diameter laser beams decrease the ability to correct higher order aberrations. A top-hat laser beam of 1 mm (Gaussian with FWHM of 0.76 mm) is small enough to produce a customized ablation for typical human eyes.

[1]  Junzhong Liang,et al.  Aberrations and retinal image quality of the normal human eye. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  V. Mahajan Aberration Theory Made Simple , 1991 .

[3]  D Williams,et al.  Visual benefit of correcting higher order aberrations of the eye. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[4]  J. Schwiegerling,et al.  Customized corneal ablation and super vision. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[5]  D R Williams,et al.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  Geunyoung Yoon,et al.  How Far Can We Extend the Limits of Human Vision ? , 2003 .

[7]  David R Williams,et al.  Calculated impact of higher-order monochromatic aberrations on retinal image quality in a population of human eyes. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  M Kaemmerer,et al.  Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: early results in three eyes. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[9]  D. Williams,et al.  Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  M. Merchea Customized Corneal Ablation: the Quest for Supervision , 2001 .

[11]  David Huang,et al.  Spot size and quality of scanning laser correction of higher‐order wavefront aberrations , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  J. Y. Wang,et al.  Wave-front interpretation with Zernike polynomials. , 1980, Applied optics.

[13]  David Williams,et al.  Visual performance after correcting the monochromatic and chromatic aberrations of the eye. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  J. Goodman Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .