Use of biorobotic models of highly deformable fins for studying the mechanics and control of fin forces in fishes.

Bony fish swim with a level of agility that is unmatched in human-developed systems. This is due, in part, to the ability of the fish to carefully control hydrodynamic forces through the active modulation of the fins' kinematics and mechanical properties. To better understand how fish produce and control forces, biorobotic models of the bluegill sunfish's (Lepomis macrochirus) caudal fin and pectoral fins were developed. The designs of these systems were based on detailed analyses of the anatomy, kinematics, and hydrodynamics of the biological fins. The fin models have been used to investigate how fin kinematics and the mechanical properties of the fin-rays influence propulsive forces and to explore kinematic patterns that were inspired by biological motions but that were not explicitly performed by the fish. Results from studies conducted with the fin models indicate that subtle changes to the kinematics and mechanical properties of fin rays can significantly impact the magnitude, direction, and time course of the 3D forces used for propulsion and maneuvers. The magnitude of the force tends to scale with the fin's stiffness, but the direction of the force is not invariant, and this causes disproportional changes in the magnitude of the thrust, lift, and lateral components of force. Results from these studies shed light on the multiple strategies that are available to the fish to modulate fin forces.

[1]  Rajat Mittal,et al.  The effect of fin ray flexural rigidity on the propulsive forces generated by a biorobotic fish pectoral fin , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  James Tangorra,et al.  A biorobotic model of the sunfish pectoral fin for investigations of fin sensorimotor control , 2010, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[3]  G. Lauder,et al.  Computational modelling and analysis of the hydrodynamics of a highly deformable fish pectoral fin , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  James L. Tangorra,et al.  Artificial muscle actuators in biorobotic fish fins , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Low-dimensional models and performance scaling of a highly deformable fish pectoral fin , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  George V Lauder,et al.  Advances in comparative physiology from high-speed imaging of animal and fluid motion. , 2008, Annual review of physiology.

[7]  James Tangorra,et al.  Fish biorobotics: kinematics and hydrodynamics of self-propulsion , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[8]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Fish locomotion: kinematics and hydrodynamics of flexible foil-like fins , 2007 .

[9]  I. Hunter,et al.  The Development of a Biologically Inspired Propulsor for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles , 2007, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[10]  Ian Hunter,et al.  The application of conducting polymers to a biorobotic fin propulsor , 2007, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[11]  Haibo Dong,et al.  Locomotion with flexible propulsors: I. Experimental analysis of pectoral fin swimming in sunfish , 2006, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[12]  Haibo Dong,et al.  Locomotion with flexible propulsors: II. Computational modeling of pectoral fin swimming in sunfish , 2006, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[13]  R. Mittal,et al.  Wake topology and hydrodynamic performance of low-aspect-ratio flapping foils , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  G. Lauder,et al.  Dorsal and anal fin function in bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus: three-dimensional kinematics during propulsion and maneuvering , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  F.S. Hover,et al.  Review of experimental work in biomimetic foils , 2004, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[16]  R. Mittal Computational modeling in biohydrodynamics: trends, challenges, and recent advances , 2004, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[17]  H. Haj-Hariri,et al.  Modelling thrust generation of a two-dimensional heaving airfoil in a viscous flow , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Jeffrey A Walker,et al.  Functional Morphology and Virtual Models: Physical Constraints on the Design of Oscillating Wings, Fins, Legs, and Feet at Intermediate Reynolds Numbers1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[19]  Jeffrey A. Walker,et al.  Performance limits of labriform propulsion and correlates with fin shape and motion. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[20]  Drucker,et al.  Pectoral fin locomotion in the striped surfperch. I. Kinematic effects of swimming speed and body size , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[21]  E. G. Drucker,et al.  Pectoral fin locomotion in the striped surfperch. II. Scaling swimming kinematics and performance at a gait transition , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  P. Webb,et al.  Hydrostatic stability of fish with swim bladders: not all fish are unstable , 1994 .

[23]  David H. Evans,et al.  The Physiology of Fishes , 1994 .

[24]  George V. Lauder,et al.  A biologically derived pectoral fin for yaw turn manoeuvres , 2010 .

[25]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  Does body and fin form affect the maneuverability of fish traversing vertical and horizontal slits? , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[26]  K. Isogai,et al.  Effects of Dynamic Stall on Propulsive Efficiency and Thrust of Flapping Airfoil , 1999 .

[27]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .