Escherichia coli infection induces distinct local and systemic transcriptome responses in the mammary gland

BackgroundColiform bacteria are the most common etiologic agents in severe mastitis of cows. Escherichia coli infections are mostly restricted to a single udder quarter whereas neighboring quarters stay clinically inapparent, implicating the presence of a systemic defense reaction. To address its underlying mechanism, we performed a transcriptome study of mammary tissue from udder quarters inoculated with E. coli (6 h and 24 h post infection), from neighboring quarters of the same animals, and from untreated control animals.ResultsAfter 6 h 13 probe sets of differentially expressed genes (DEG) were detected in infected quarters versus control animals. Eighteen hours later 2154 and 476 DEG were found in infected and in neighboring quarters vs. control animals. Cluster analysis revealed DEG found only in infected quarters (local response) and DEG detected in both infected and neighboring quarters (systemic response). The first group includes genes mainly involved in immune response and inflammation, while the systemic reaction comprises antigen processing and presentation, cytokines, protein degradation and apoptosis. Enhanced expression of antimicrobial genes (S100A8, S100A9, S100A12, CXCL2, GNLY), acute phase genes (LBP, SAA3, CP, BF, C6, C4BPA, IF), and indicators of oxidative stress (GPX3, MT1A, MT2A, SOD2) point to an active defense reaction in infected and neighboring healthy quarters. Its early onset is indicated by increased transcription of NFIL3 at 6 h. NFIL3 is a predicted regulator of many genes of the systemic response at 24 h. The significance of our transcriptome study was evidenced by some recent findings with candidate gene based approaches.ConclusionsThe discovery and holistic analysis of an extensive systemic reaction in the mammary gland significantly expands the knowledge of host-pathogen interactions in mastitis which may be relevant for the development of novel therapies and for genetic selection towards mastitis resistance.

[1]  M. Paape,et al.  Enhancement of chemotactic response of polymorphonuclear leukocytes into the mammary gland and isolation from milk. , 1977, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  R. W. Adkinson,et al.  Distribution of clinical mastitis among quarters of the bovine udder. , 1993, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  C. Burvenich,et al.  Classification of newly calved cows into moderate and severe responders to experimentally induced Escherichia coli mastitis , 1993, Journal of Dairy Research.

[4]  C. Gyles,et al.  Escherichia coli mastitis. , 1994 .

[5]  J. Gordon,et al.  Expression of the Neutrophil Chemoattractant Interleukin-8 in the Lesions of Bovine Pneumonic Pasteurellosis , 1998, Veterinary pathology.

[6]  D. Döpfer,et al.  Recurrent clinical mastitis caused by Escherichia coli in dairy cows. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  H. Saloniemi,et al.  Acute Phase Response in Dairy Cows with Experimentally Induced Escherichia coli Mastitis , 1999, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[8]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and nitrite/nitrate responses during acute mastitis induced by Escherichia coli infection and endotoxin in dairy cows. , 2000, Domestic animal endocrinology.

[9]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Alfonso Valencia,et al.  A hierarchical unsupervised growing neural network for clustering gene expression patterns , 2001, Bioinform..

[11]  C. Burvenich,et al.  Local and systemic effects of endotoxin mastitis on the chemiluminescence of milk and blood neutrophils in dairy cows. , 2001, Veterinary research.

[12]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[13]  J. Gordon,et al.  Molecular Regulation of Urothelial Renewal and Host Defenses during Infection with Uropathogenic Escherichia coli * 210 , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  D. Hoover,et al.  Many chemokines including CCL20/MIP‐3α display antimicrobial activity , 2003 .

[15]  D. Hoover,et al.  Many chemokines including CCL20/MIP-3alpha display antimicrobial activity. , 2003, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[16]  Christine Fourichon,et al.  Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. , 2003, Veterinary research.

[17]  T. Speed,et al.  Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  L. Duchateau,et al.  Severity of E. coli mastitis is mainly determined by cow factors. , 2003, Veterinary research.

[19]  S. Davis,et al.  Expression of a β-Defensin mRNA, Lingual Antimicrobial Peptide, in Bovine Mammary Epithelial Tissue Is Induced by Mastitis , 2004, Infection and Immunity.

[20]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Haptoglobin concentrations in blood and milk after endotoxin challenge and quantification of mammary Hp mRNA expression. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  E. Wolf,et al.  Monitoring gene expression changes in bovine oviduct epithelial cells during the oestrous cycle. , 2004, Journal of molecular endocrinology.

[22]  Gordon K Smyth,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments , 2011 .

[23]  Jean YH Yang,et al.  Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics , 2004, Genome Biology.

[24]  Richard A. Young,et al.  Insights into host responses against pathogens from transcriptional profiling , 2005, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[25]  I. Kola,et al.  Elf5 is essential for early embryogenesis and mammary gland development during pregnancy and lactation , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[26]  E. Wolf,et al.  Monozygotic Twin Model Reveals Novel Embryo-Induced Transcriptome Changes of Bovine Endometrium in the Preattachment Period1 , 2006, Biology of reproduction.

[27]  Chris M. Brown,et al.  Inference of transcriptional regulation using gene expression data from the bovine and human genomes , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[28]  J. Visvader,et al.  Socs2 and elf5 mediate prolactin-induced mammary gland development. , 2006, Molecular endocrinology.

[29]  D. Kerr,et al.  Genome-Wide Expression Analysis of Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Mastitis in a Mouse Model , 2006, Infection and Immunity.

[30]  Shannan J. Ho Sui,et al.  oPOSSUM: integrated tools for analysis of regulatory motif over-representation , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  R. Merle,et al.  Cell function in the bovine mammary gland: a preliminary study on interdependence of healthy and infected udder quarters , 2007, Journal of Dairy Research.

[32]  M. Lund,et al.  Analysis of the real EADGENE data set: Comparison of methods and guidelines for data normalisation and selection of differentially expressed genes (Open Access publication) , 2007, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[33]  M. C. Rudolph,et al.  Metabolic regulation in the lactating mammary gland: a lipid synthesizing machine. , 2007, Physiological genomics.

[34]  S. Pyörälä,et al.  Mastitis in post-partum dairy cows. , 2008, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[35]  D. Bannerman,et al.  Proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in bovine milk during experimentally induced Escherichia coli mastitis. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[36]  Maurice Bouwhuis,et al.  CoPub: a literature-based keyword enrichment tool for microarray data analysis , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[37]  M. Gómez-Lechón,et al.  ATF5 Is a Highly Abundant Liver-Enriched Transcription Factor that Cooperates with Constitutive Androstane Receptor in the Transactivation of CYP2B6: Implications in Hepatic Stress Responses , 2008, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[38]  S. Dunner,et al.  Evaluation of suitable reference genes for gene expression studies in bovine muscular tissue , 2008, BMC Molecular Biology.

[39]  M. Paape,et al.  Comparison of Holstein and Jersey innate immune responses to Escherichia coli intramammary infection. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[40]  Y T Gröhn,et al.  The cost of generic clinical mastitis in dairy cows as estimated by using dynamic programming. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[41]  T. Vuocolo,et al.  Identification of immune genes and proteins involved in the response of bovine mammary tissue to Staphylococcus aureus infection. , 2008, BMC veterinary research.

[42]  R. Brunner,et al.  Bovine TLR2 and TLR4 properly transduce signals from Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli, but S. aureus fails to both activate NF-kappaB in mammary epithelial cells and to quickly induce TNFalpha and interleukin-8 (CXCL8) expression in the udder. , 2008, Molecular immunology.

[43]  Y. Aida,et al.  Evidence for cattle major histocompatibility complex (BoLA) class II DQA1 gene heterozygote advantage against clinical mastitis caused by Streptococci and Escherichia species. , 2008, Tissue antigens.

[44]  S. Pyörälä,et al.  Acute phase response in two consecutive experimentally induced E. coli intramammary infections in dairy cows , 2008, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

[45]  Li Jiang,et al.  Gene expression profiling of liver from dairy cows treated intra-mammary with lipopolysaccharide , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[46]  J. Günther,et al.  Escherichia coli, but not Staphylococcus aureus triggers an early increased expression of factors contributing to the innate immune defense in the udder of the cow. , 2008, Veterinary research.

[47]  S. Davis,et al.  Transcriptome profiling of Streptococcus uberis-induced mastitis reveals fundamental differences between immune gene expression in the mammary gland and in a primary cell culture model. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[48]  S. McDougall,et al.  Expression of innate resistance factors in mammary secretion from periparturient dairy heifers and their association with subsequent infection status. , 2009, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[49]  Sreeparna Banerjee.  ALOX15 (arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase) , 2011 .