Using connectome-based predictive modeling to predict individual behavior from brain connectivity

Neuroimaging is a fast-developing research area in which anatomical and functional images of human brains are collected using techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and electroencephalography (EEG). Technical advances and large-scale data sets have allowed for the development of models capable of predicting individual differences in traits and behavior using brain connectivity measures derived from neuroimaging data. Here, we present connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM), a data-driven protocol for developing predictive models of brain-behavior relationships from connectivity data using cross-validation. This protocol includes the following steps: (i) feature selection, (ii) feature summarization, (iii) model building, and (iv) assessment of prediction significance. We also include suggestions for visualizing the most predictive features (i.e., brain connections). The final result should be a generalizable model that takes brain connectivity data as input and generates predictions of behavioral measures in novel subjects, accounting for a considerable amount of the variance in these measures. It has been demonstrated that the CPM protocol performs as well as or better than many of the existing approaches in brain-behavior prediction. As CPM focuses on linear modeling and a purely data-driven approach, neuroscientists with limited or no experience in machine learning or optimization will find it easy to implement these protocols. Depending on the volume of data to be processed, the protocol can take 10-100 min for model building, 1-48 h for permutation testing, and 10-20 min for visualization of results.

[1]  P. Holland,et al.  Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares , 1977 .

[2]  R. Cameron Craddock,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of regional variation in the impact of head micromovements on functional connectomics , 2013, NeuroImage.

[3]  Alex Martin,et al.  Functional connectivity classification of autism identifies highly predictive brain features but falls short of biomarker standards , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[4]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI , 2015, NeuroImage.

[6]  H. Pashler,et al.  Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition 1 , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[7]  Chris I. Baker,et al.  Circular inference in neuroscience: The dangers of double dipping , 2010 .

[8]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[9]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  HCP beta-release of the Functional Connectivity MegaTrawl , 2015 .

[11]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Carlos H. Acuña The ADHD-200 Consortium: a model to advance the translational potential of neuroimaging in clinical neuroscience , 2012 .

[13]  Russell Greiner,et al.  ADHD-200 Global Competition: diagnosing ADHD using personal characteristic data can outperform resting state fMRI measurements , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[14]  R. Whelan,et al.  When Optimism Hurts: Inflated Predictions in Psychiatric Neuroimaging , 2014, Biological Psychiatry.

[15]  Margaret D. King,et al.  The NKI-Rockland Sample: A Model for Accelerating the Pace of Discovery Science in Psychiatry , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[16]  Timothy S. Coalson,et al.  Parcellations and hemispheric asymmetries of human cerebral cortex analyzed on surface-based atlases. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Prediction as a Humanitarian and Pragmatic Contribution from Human Cognitive Neuroscience , 2015, Neuron.

[18]  Torkel Klingberg,et al.  Structural Maturation and Brain Activity Predict Future Working Memory Capacity during Childhood Development , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  P. Mahadevan,et al.  An overview , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[21]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[22]  D. Hu,et al.  Identifying major depression using whole-brain functional connectivity: a multivariate pattern analysis. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  Om Pal Singh,et al.  A multivariate pattern recognition analysis of BOR-60 sodium boiling noise data , 1990 .

[24]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Spurious group differences due to head motion in a diffusion MRI study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[25]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[26]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Predicting treatment response in social anxiety disorder from functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2012, JAMA psychiatry.

[27]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Classification of schizophrenia patients based on resting-state functional network connectivity , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[28]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models: A Framework for Traditional and Novel Measures , 2010, Epidemiology.

[29]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Prediction of Individual Brain Maturity Using fMRI , 2010, Science.

[30]  K. Covinsky,et al.  Assessing the Generalizability of Prognostic Information , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[31]  R Cameron Craddock,et al.  A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[32]  M. Chun,et al.  A neuromarker of sustained attention from whole-brain functional connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  André Zugman,et al.  Commentary: Functional connectome fingerprint: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[34]  Mark A. Elliott,et al.  The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: A publicly available resource for the study of normal and abnormal brain development in youth , 2016, NeuroImage.

[35]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[36]  Abbas Babajani-Feremi,et al.  Identifying patients with Alzheimer’s disease using resting-state fMRI and graph theory , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  Xenophon Papademetris,et al.  Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI data for network node identification , 2013, NeuroImage.

[38]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Support Vector Regression Machines , 1996, NIPS.

[39]  Jared A. Nielsen,et al.  Functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging classification of autism. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  Y. Liu,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity Predicts Impulsivity in Economic Decision-Making , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Neural predictors of individual differences in response to math tutoring in primary-grade school children , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[43]  D. Ruppert,et al.  A Note on Computing Robust Regression Estimates via Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares , 1988 .

[44]  Sheng Zhang,et al.  Cocaine dependence and thalamic functional connectivity: a multivariate pattern analysis , 2016, NeuroImage: Clinical.