Optimal design of laminated piezocomposite energy harvesting devices considering stress constraints

Summary Energy harvesting devices are smart structures capable of converting the mechanical energy (generally, in the form of vibrations) that would be wasted otherwise in the environment into usable electrical energy. Laminated piezoelectric plate and shell structures have been largely used in the design of these devices because of their large generation areas. The design of energy harvesting devices is complex, and they can be efficiently designed by using topology optimization methods (TOM). In this work, the design of laminated piezocomposite energy harvesting devices has been studied using TOM. The energy harvesting performance is improved by maximizing the effective electric power generated by the piezoelectric material, measured at a coupled electric resistor, when subjected to a harmonic excitation. However, harmonic vibrations generate mechanical stress distribution that, depending on the frequency and the amplitude of vibration, may lead to piezoceramic failure. This study advocates using a global stress constraint, which accounts for different failure criteria for different types of materials (isotropic, piezoelectric, and orthotropic). Thus, the electric power is maximized by optimally distributing piezoelectric material, by choosing its polarization sign, and by properly choosing the fiber angles of composite materials to satisfy the global stress constraint. In the TOM formulation, the Piezoelectric Material with Penalization and Polarization material model is applied to distribute piezoelectric material and to choose its polarization sign, and the Discrete Material Optimization method is applied to optimize the composite fiber orientation. The finite element method is adopted to model the structure with a piezoelectric multilayered shell element. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the proposed methodology. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. L. Bucalém,et al.  A family of piezoelectric MITC plate elements , 2005 .

[2]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Optimization with non-homogeneous failure criteria like Tsai–Wu for composite laminates , 2006 .

[3]  Emílio Carlos Nelli Silva,et al.  Topology optimization of smart structures: design of piezoelectric plate and shell actuators , 2005 .

[4]  Kurt Maute,et al.  Analysis of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Systems with Non-linear Circuits Using the Harmonic Balance Method , 2010 .

[5]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology optimization of continuum structures with local stress constraints , 1998 .

[6]  Erik Lund,et al.  Discrete material optimization of general composite shell structures , 2005 .

[7]  D. Inman,et al.  A Review of Power Harvesting from Vibration using Piezoelectric Materials , 2004 .

[8]  K. Svanberg.  The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[9]  H. Gea,et al.  Topology optimization of energy harvesting devices using piezoelectric materials , 2009 .

[10]  S. Beeby,et al.  Energy harvesting vibration sources for microsystems applications , 2006 .

[11]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  On the optimal energy harvesting from a vibration source using a PZT stack , 2009 .

[12]  Kurt Maute,et al.  Design of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Systems: A Topology Optimization Approach Based on Multilayer Plates and Shells , 2009 .

[13]  J. Calderon‐Moreno,et al.  Stress induced domain switching of PZT in compression tests , 2001 .

[14]  Jae-Eun Kim,et al.  Multi-physics interpolation for the topology optimization of piezoelectric systems , 2010 .

[15]  Manfred Kaltenbacher,et al.  Topology optimization of a cantilevered piezoelectric energy harvester using stress norm constraints , 2013 .

[16]  T. E. Bruns,et al.  Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms , 2001 .

[17]  G. Rozvany.  On design-dependent constraints and singular topologies , 2001 .

[18]  Erik Holmberg,et al.  Stress constrained topology optimization , 2013, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[19]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Distributed Parameter Electromechanical Model for Cantilevered Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters , 2008 .

[20]  G. Cheng,et al.  ε-relaxed approach in structural topology optimization , 1997 .

[21]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Effect of Strain Nodes and Electrode Configuration on Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting From Cantilevered Beams , 2009 .

[22]  Erik Lund,et al.  Buckling topology optimization of laminated multi-material composite shell structures , 2009 .

[23]  Julián A. Norato,et al.  Stress-based topology optimization for continua , 2010 .

[24]  V Balamurugan,et al.  A piezolaminated composite degenerated shell finite element for active control of structures with distributed piezosensors and actuators , 2008 .

[25]  Miguel Luiz Bucalem,et al.  Analysis of smart laminates using piezoelectric MITC plate and shell elements , 2005 .

[26]  M. Bruggi,et al.  A mixed FEM approach to stress‐constrained topology optimization , 2008 .

[27]  James K. Guest,et al.  Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions , 2004 .

[28]  James K. Guest,et al.  Eliminating beta-continuation from Heaviside projection and density filter algorithms , 2011 .

[29]  Henry A. Sodano,et al.  A review of power harvesting using piezoelectric materials (2003–2006) , 2007 .

[30]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Analysis of thick and thin shell structures by curved finite elements , 1970 .

[31]  Glaucio H. Paulino,et al.  Truss layout optimization within a continuum , 2013 .

[32]  Emílio Carlos Nelli Silva,et al.  Design of laminated piezocomposite shell transducers with arbitrary fiber orientation using topology optimization approach , 2012 .