Comments on Cracking The Code: Rulemaking For Humans And Machines (August 2020 draft) Comments on the draft OECD White Paper on Rules as Code, submitted on 27 August 2020 to the authors

[1]  P. Vasant,et al.  Modeling, Simulation and Optimization , 2022, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies.

[2]  Mark Chen,et al.  Language Models are Few-Shot Learners , 2020, NeurIPS.

[3]  Sotirios Karampatakis,et al.  Orchestrating NLP Services for the Legal Domain , 2020, LREC.

[4]  Sepideh Ghanavati,et al.  A Methodology for Implementing the Formal Legal-GRL Framework: A Research Preview , 2020, REFSQ.

[5]  A. Roberts,et al.  Cracking the code: Rulemaking for humans and machines , 2020 .

[6]  Will Bateman.  Algorithmic Decision-Making and Legality: Public Law Dimensions , 2019 .

[7]  Shoshana Zuboff.  The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power , 2019 .

[8]  Katharina Pistor,et al.  Incomplete Law , 2019 .

[9]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Crowdsourcing roles, methods and tools for data-intensive disaster management , 2018, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[10]  John J. Nay.  Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning for Law and Policy Texts , 2018 .

[11]  Xiwei Xu,et al.  On legal contracts, imperative and declarative smart contracts, and blockchain systems , 2018, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[12]  Elena Montiel-Ponsoda,et al.  Language Resources as Linked Data for the Legal Domain , 2018, Law via the Internet.

[13]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Legal Compliance Through Design: Preliminary Results , 2018, TERECOM@JURIX.

[14]  Moe Thandar Wynn,et al.  Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead , 2018, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[15]  Guido Governatori,et al.  Norms modeling constructs of business process compliance management frameworks: a conceptual evaluation , 2017, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[16]  Kevin D. Ashley.  Book review: Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age , 2015 .

[17]  Neil Savage.  Weaving the web , 2017, Commun. ACM.

[18]  Louis de Koker,et al.  Regulation of Big Data: Perspectives on strategy, policy, law and privacy , 2017, Health and Technology.

[19]  Cristiana Santos,et al.  On the concept of relevance in legal information retrieval , 2017, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[20]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  A Linked Data Terminology for Copyright Based on Ontolex-Lemon , 2017, AICOL.

[21]  Patrick Keyzer.  Open Rights or Secret Risk Assessments? New Challenges for Public Law in an Age of Artificial Intelligence and the Law , 2017, LINKDEM@IJCAI.

[22]  Serena Villata,et al.  Semantic Business Process Regulatory Compliance Checking Using LegalRuleML , 2016, EKAW.

[23]  Maria Wimmer,et al.  Requirements for an Architecture Framework for Pan-European E-Government Services , 2016, EGOV.

[24]  Matthias Grabmair,et al.  Modeling Purposive Legal Argumentation and Case Outcome Prediction using Argument Schemesin the Value Judgment Formalism , 2016 .

[25]  Moe Thandar Wynn,et al.  Normative requirements for regulatory compliance: An abstract formal framework , 2015, Information Systems Frontiers.

[26]  Jaap-Henk Hoepman,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Privacy Design Strategies , 2016, 2016 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW).

[27]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Semantic Web for the Legal Domain: The next step , 2016, Semantic Web.

[28]  Guido Governatori,et al.  The Regorous Approach to Process Compliance , 2015, 2015 IEEE 19th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop.

[29]  Guido Governatori,et al.  No Time for Compliance , 2015, 2015 IEEE 19th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference.

[30]  Daniel Amyot,et al.  Information Technology Artifacts in the Regulatory Compliance of Business Processes: A Meta-Analysis , 2015, MCETECH.

[31]  Guido Governatori,et al.  Thou shalt is not you will , 2014, ICAIL.

[32]  Ronald Leenes,et al.  Privacy regulation cannot be hardcoded. A critical comment on the ‘privacy by design’ provision in data-protection law , 2014 .

[33]  Andrei Marmor.  The Language of Law , 2014 .

[34]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Fighting Organized Crime Through Open Source Intelligence: Regulatory Strategies of the CAPER Project , 2014, JURIX.

[35]  Guido Boella,et al.  Integrating Legal-URN and Eunomos: Towards a Comprehensive Compliance Management Solution , 2013, AICOL.

[36]  Rabeea Assy.  Can the Law Speak Directly to its Subjects? The Limitation of Plain Language , 2011 .

[37]  Huajun Chen,et al.  The Semantic Web , 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[38]  Stephen Gageler.  Common law statutes and judicial legislation: Statutory interpretation as a common law process , 2011 .

[39]  Jeffrey Barnes.  When 'Plain Language' Legislation Is Ambiguous - Sources of Doubt and Lessons for the Plain Language Movement , 2010 .

[40]  R. Davidrajuh.  Modeling Ethical Decisions , 2010 .

[41]  Guido Governatori,et al.  Rules and Norms: Requirements for Rule Interchange Languages in the Legal Domain , 2009, RuleML.

[42]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  eXtreme Design with Content Ontology Design Patterns , 2009, WOP.

[43]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Law and Technology: Looking into the future - selected essays , 2009 .

[44]  J. Barnes.  Sources of Doubt and the Quest for Legal Certainty , 2008 .

[45]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[46]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  MetaLex XML and the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[47]  Dimitris Karagiannis.  A Business Process-Based Modelling Extension for Regulatory Compliance , 2008, Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[48]  Rinke Hoekstra,et al.  The LKIF Core Ontology of Basic Legal Concepts , 2007, LOAIT.

[49]  R. Burke,et al.  Leadership in organizations , 2006 .

[50]  R. Heifetz,et al.  Leadership Without Easy Answers , 2006 .

[51]  Andrew Stranieri,et al.  A hybrid rule – neural approach for the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[52]  S. Harrison,et al.  Shining examples. , 2003, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[53]  C. Thomasset.  La Décision artificielle: Le Droit, la machine et l'humain , Danièle Bourcier, Collection «Les voies du droit». Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1995, 237 pp. , 1996, Canadian journal of law and society.

[54]  Henning Herrestad,et al.  Norms and formalization , 1991, ICAIL '91.

[55]  L. Thorne McCarty,et al.  A language for legal Discourse I. basic features , 1989, ICAIL '89.

[56]  Marek J. Sergot,et al.  The British Nationality Act as a logic program , 1986, CACM.

[57]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Towards a rule-based representation of open texture in law , 1985 .

[58]  L. Kohlberg.  The Philosophy of Moral Development Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice , 1981 .

[59]  David Miers,et al.  How to Do Things with Rules , 1977 .

[60]  Layman E. Allen,et al.  Symbolic Logic: A Razor-Edged Tool for Drafting and Interpreting Legal Documents , 1957 .