Measuring competitive impact: Joint‐species modelling of invaded plant communities

Non‐native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non‐native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively dominant species and reduce their impacts. Joint‐species distribution models (JSDMs) can potentially quantify competitive impacts by simultaneously modelling how species respond to environmental variation and to changes in community composition. We describe a JSDM to model variation in plant cover and show how this can be applied to compositional data to detect dominant competitors that cause other species to decline in abundance. We applied the model to an experiment in an invaded grassy‐woodland community in Australia where we manipulated biomass removal (through slashing and fencing to prevent grazing by kangaroos) along a fertility gradient. Non‐native species dominated plant cover at high fertility sites in the absence of biomass removal. Results from the JSDM identified three of the 72 non‐native plant species (Bromus diandrus, Acetosella vulgaris and especially Avena fatua) as having a strong competitive impact on the community, driving changes in composition and reducing the cover of both native and non‐native species, particularly in the absence of grazing. The dominant non‐native grasses Bromus diandrus and Avena fatua were among the tallest species in the community and had the greatest impact on shorter‐statured species, most likely through competition for light under conditions of high fertility and low grazing. Synthesis. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.

[1]  Laura J. Pollock,et al.  Do joint species distribution models reliably detect interspecific interactions from co‐occurrence data in homogenous environments? , 2018 .

[2]  Brittany J. Teller,et al.  Weak interspecific interactions in a sagebrush steppe? Conflicting evidence from observations and experiments. , 2018, Ecology.

[3]  D. Driscoll,et al.  Covariation of soil nutrients drives occurrence of exotic and native plant species , 2018 .

[4]  E. Borer,et al.  Herbivores safeguard plant diversity by reducing variability in dominance , 2018 .

[5]  J. Blois,et al.  Multiresponse algorithms for community‐level modelling: Review of theory, applications, and comparison to species distribution models , 2017 .

[6]  D. Driscoll.  Disturbance maintains native and exotic plant species richness in invaded grassy woodlands , 2017 .

[7]  M. Vellend,et al.  Plant Biodiversity Change Across Scales During the Anthropocene. , 2017, Annual review of plant biology.

[8]  James S. Clark,et al.  Generalized joint attribute modeling for biodiversity analysis: median-zero, multivariate, multifarious data , 2017 .

[9]  Jiqiang Guo,et al.  Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language. , 2017, Journal of statistical software.

[10]  Janet Franklin,et al.  Effects of biotic interactions on modeled species' distribution can be masked by environmental gradients , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[11]  E. Borer,et al.  Species origin affects the rate of response to inter-annual growing season precipitation and nutrient addition in four Australian native grasslands , 2016 .

[12]  E. Borer,et al.  Addition of multiple limiting resources reduces grassland diversity , 2016, Nature.

[13]  Competing drivers lead to non-linear native–exotic relationships in endangered temperate grassy woodlands , 2016, Biological Invasions.

[14]  E. Borer,et al.  Climate modifies response of non-native and native species richness to nutrient enrichment , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Francis K. C. Hui,et al.  So Many Variables: Joint Modeling in Community Ecology. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Plant species' origin predicts dominance and response to nutrient enrichment and herbivores in global grasslands , 2015, Nature Communications.

[17]  Sara Taskinen,et al.  Model‐based approaches to unconstrained ordination , 2015 .

[18]  M. Mayfield,et al.  Distinct invasion strategies operating within a natural annual plant system. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[19]  Melinda D. Smith,et al.  Resource availability modulates above‐ and below‐ground competitive interactions between genotypes of a dominant C4 grass , 2014 .

[20]  Laura J. Pollock,et al.  Understanding co‐occurrence by modelling species simultaneously with a Joint Species Distribution Model (JSDM) , 2014 .

[21]  Brett A. Melbourne,et al.  Herbivores and nutrients control grassland plant diversity via light limitation , 2014 .

[22]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Predicting invasion in grassland ecosystems: is exotic dominance the real embarrassment of richness? , 2013, Global change biology.

[23]  P. Hulme,et al.  Functional differences between alien and native species: do biotic interactions determine the functional structure of highly invaded grasslands? , 2013 .

[24]  M. Hoopes,et al.  Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species , 2013 .

[25]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Improving species distribution models using biotic interactions: a case study of parasites, pollinators and plants , 2013 .

[26]  P. Reich,et al.  New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2013 .

[27]  Management legacies shape decadal-scale responses of plant diversity to experimental disturbance regimes in fragmented grassy woodlands , 2013 .

[28]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  Life-history constraints in grassland plant species: a growth-defence trade-off is the norm. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[29]  W. D. Kissling,et al.  The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[30]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Towards novel approaches to modelling biotic interactions in multispecies assemblages at large spatial extents , 2012 .

[31]  M. Vilà,et al.  Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[32]  H. Olff,et al.  Functional differences between native and alien species: a global-scale comparison: Functional differences of native and alien plants , 2010 .

[33]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Modeling species co-occurrence by multivariate logistic regression generates new hypotheses on fungal interactions. , 2010, Ecology.

[34]  Benjamin P Colman,et al.  California annual grass invaders: the drivers or passengers of change? , 2010, The Journal of ecology.

[35]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Predicting potential distributions of invasive species: where to go from here? , 2010 .

[37]  Jorge Soberón.  Niche and area of distribution modeling: a population ecology perspective , 2010 .

[38]  M. Fischer,et al.  A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[39]  B. Gilbert,et al.  Plant invasions and the niche , 2009 .

[40]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Grazing responses in herbs in relation to herbivore selectivity and plant traits in an alpine ecosystem , 2009, Oecologia.

[41]  Andy Hector,et al.  Competition for Light Causes Plant Biodiversity Loss After Eutrophication , 2009, Science.

[42]  A M Latimer,et al.  Hierarchical models facilitate spatial analysis of large data sets: a case study on invasive plant species in the northeastern United States. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[43]  S. Prober,et al.  Restoration of Themeda australis swards suppresses soil nitrate and enhances ecological resistance to invasion by exotic annuals , 2009, Biological Invasions.

[44]  Terry Koen,et al.  Restoring ecological function in temperate grassy woodlands: manipulating soil nutrients, exotic annuals and native perennial grasses through carbon supplements and spring burns , 2005 .

[45]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  Experimental evidence for the effects of additional water, nutrients and physical disturbance on invasive plants in low fertility Hawkesbury Sandstone soils, Sydney, Australia , 2005 .

[46]  A. MacDougall,et al.  ARE INVASIVE SPECIES THE DRIVERS OR PASSENGERS OF CHANGE IN DEGRADED ECOSYSTEMS , 2005 .

[47]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  P. Chesson,et al.  Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions , 2002 .

[49]  M. Williamson,et al.  The Varying Success of Invaders , 1996 .

[50]  Jiang Fan,et al.  Effects of soil fertility level and cutting frequency on interference among Hieracium pilosella, H. praealtum, Rumex acetosella, and Festuca novae‐zelandiae , 1996 .

[51]  J. Tobin.  Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables , 1958 .