Suppressing Competition in a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning System

The purpose of this study is to explore how student competition using the tit-for-tat strategy could be remedied with a minimum design change in order to support student to collaborate constructively in a computer supported-collaborative learning system called SWoRD (Scaffolded Writing and Reviewing in the Discipline) [5], a reciprocal peer reviewing of writing system. We identified a factor for the tit-for-tat that causes learners to compete each other, and removed the factor from the interface. The results show when with the interface improvement the tit-for-tat strategy was restrained in the SWoRD system, which helped the learners constructively respond to peer comments.

[1]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  The SWoRD is mightier than the pen: scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings..

[2]  K. Topping Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities , 1998 .

[3]  Richard H. Haswell NCTE/CCCC’s Recent War on Scholarship , 2005 .

[4]  K. Topping,et al.  Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students , 2000 .

[5]  Sara Kiesler Culture of the Internet , 1997 .

[6]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives , 2006 .

[7]  C. Schunn,et al.  Commenting on Writing , 2006 .

[8]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Battling the Tyranny of the Thousands with a SWoRD: Scaffolded Writing and ReWriting in the Discipline , 2003 .

[9]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[10]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[11]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Peter Knight,et al.  Assessment for learning in higher education , 1998 .

[13]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Web based peer assessment: attitude and achievement , 2001, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[14]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and the Use of Technology , 2007 .

[15]  Liz McDowell,et al.  The Impact of Innovative Assessment on Student Learning , 1995 .

[16]  Christopher Rushton,et al.  Peer Assessment in a Collaborative Hypermedia Environment: A Case Study. , 1993 .

[17]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Comprehension Monitoring and Regulation in Distance Collaboration , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.