Student test scores are improved in a virtual learning environment.

This study evaluates the effectiveness of delivering the core curriculum of an introductory neuroscience course using a software application referred to as a virtual learning interface (VLI). The performance of students in a virtual learning environment (VLE) is compared with that of students in a conventional lecture hall in which the same lecturer presented the same material. This study was not designed to determine whether grades are improved by augmenting a lecture with other information. The VLI takes advantage of audio, video, animation, and text in a multimedia computer environment. Our results indicate that raw average scores on weekly examinations were 14 percentage points higher for students in the VLE compared with those for students in a conventional lecture hall setting. Moreover, normalized test scores were over 5 points higher for students in the VLE. This analysis suggest that a core curriculum can be effectively presented to students using the VLE, thereby making it possible for faculty to spend less class time relaying facts and more time engaging students in discussion of scientific theory.

[1]  F. Deek,et al.  Instructional technology: A tool or a panacea? , 1996 .

[2]  Scott E. Van Bramer.  Using Mathcad To Teach Instrumental Techniques. , 1998 .

[3]  Arthur Melmed.  A Learning Infrastructure for All Americans: Summary of a Report to the National Science Foundation. , 1994 .

[4]  Lawrence B. Flick,et al.  Interaction of intuitive physics with computer‐simulated physics , 1990 .

[5]  Jon J. Denton.  An Examination of Instructional Strategies Used with Two-Way Television. , 1984 .

[6]  Rita Dunn,et al.  Learning Styles and Computers. , 1990 .

[7]  Rhonda S. Robinson,et al.  Interactive Cable Television: An Evaluation Study. , 1986 .

[8]  Mary McComb.  Augmenting a Group Discussion Course with Computer-Mediated Communication in a Small College Setting. , 1993 .

[9]  Wayne Moellenberg,et al.  Effects of conceptual systems and instructional methods on general chemistry laboratory achievement , 1990 .

[10]  Gil Caudill.  Matching Teaching and Learning Styles , 2018, Precepting Medical Residents in the Office.

[11]  Robert N. Nelson.  Two-Way Microwave Transmission Consolidates, Improves Education , 1985 .

[12]  Murray S. Jensen.  Finding a Place for the Computer in the Introductory Biology Laboratory , 1998 .

[13]  Jeff King,et al.  Learning Styles and Absenteeism: Is There a Connection?. , 1995 .

[14]  David Hawkridge.  Reforming Educational Technology. , 1996 .

[15]  Mark Windschitl,et al.  A Practical Guide for Incorporating Computer-Based Simulations into Science Instruction , 1998 .

[16]  Rory McGreal.  Comparison of the Attitudes of Learners Taking Audiographic Teleconferencing Courses in Secondary Schools in Northern Ontario. , 1994 .

[17]  Richard W. Jelier,et al.  Making Educational Reform , 1997 .

[18]  William C. Norris,et al.  Improving Education Through Technological Innovation. , 1985 .

[19]  K. W. Creswell.  Does Instructional TV Make the Grade , 1986 .

[20]  Vicky Phillips,et al.  The Best Distance Learning Graduate Schools: Earning Your Degree Without Leaving Home , 1998 .

[21]  Carolyn Cropper.  Teaching for Different Learning Styles , 1994 .

[22]  E Culotta.  Can Science Education Be Saved?: Three ambitious but very different projects are testing a variety of ways to overhaul an education system that has been getting failing grades. , 1990, Science.

[23]  James R. Layton,et al.  No Significant Difference Phenomenon , 1999, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..