Gender- and parity-specific reference charts for fetal size in low risk singleton pregnancies at the onset of the third trimester

Abstract Objectives: To determine fetal growth in low risk pregnancies at the beginning of the third trimester and to assess the relative importance of fetal gender and maternal parity. Setting: Dutch primary care midwifery practice. Study design: Retrospective cohort study on 3641 singleton pregnancies seen at a primary care midwifery center in the Netherlands. Parameters used for analysis were fetal abdominal circumference (AC), fetal head circumference (HC), gestational age, fetal gender and maternal parity. Regression analysis was applied to describe variation in AC and HC with gestational age. Means and standard deviations in the present population were compared with commonly used reference charts. Multiple regression analysis was applied to examine whether gender and parity should be taken into account. Results: The fetal AC and HC increased significantly between the 27th and the 33rd week of pregnancy (AC r2=0.3652, P<0.0001; HC r2=0.3301, P<0.0001). Compared to some curves, our means and standard deviations were significantly smaller (at 30+0 weeks AC mean=258±13 mm; HC mean=281±14 mm), but corresponded well with other curves. Fetal gender was a significant determinant for both AC (P<0.0001) and HC (P<0.0001). Parity contributed significantly to AC only but the difference was small (β=0.00464). Conclusion: At the begining of the third trimester, fetal size is associated with fetal gender and, to a lesser extent, with parity. Some fetal growth charts (e.g., Chitty et al.) are more suitable for the low-risk population in the Netherlands than others.

[1]  E. Ryding,et al.  Routine ultrasound screening in the third trimester: a population‐based study , 2005, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[2]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Risk selection and detection. A critical appraisal of the Dutch obstetric system , 2004 .

[3]  E. Ostrea,et al.  Drugs that affect the fetus and newborn infant via the placenta or breast milk. , 2004, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[4]  Y. Ville,et al.  Sex‐specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15–40 weeks of gestation , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[5]  P. Royston,et al.  How to construct ‘normal ranges’ for fetal variables , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal measurements , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  Stuart Campbell,et al.  Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements * , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  W. Moore,et al.  Sex difference in fetal head growth , 1988, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[9]  J. Newton,et al.  The ultrasound estimation of sex-related variations of intrauterine growth. , 1984, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  J. Fleming,et al.  A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF SONAR “CROWN‐RUMP LENGTH” MEASUREMENTS , 1975, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[11]  G. J. Kloosterman On Intrauterine Growth , 1970 .

[12]  J. Nijhuis,et al.  Perinatal audit on avoidable mortality in a Dutch rural region: a retrospective study. , 2000, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[13]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Fetal biometry at 14–40 weeks' gestation , 1994, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.