Machine learning on quantifying quantum steerability

We apply the artificial neural network to quantify two-qubit steerability based on the steerable weight, which can be computed through semidefinite programming. Due to the fact that the optimal measurement strategy is unknown, it is still very difficult and time-consuming to efficiently obtain the steerability for an arbitrary quantum state. In this work, we show the method via machine learning technique which provides an effective way to quantify steerability. Furthermore, the generalization ability of the trained model is also demonstrated by applying to the Werner state and that in dephasing noise channel. Our findings provide an new way to obtain steerability efficiently and accurately, revealing effective application of the machine learning method on exploring quantum steering.

[1]  D Cavalcanti,et al.  Quantum steering: a review with focus on semidefinite programming , 2016, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[2]  Werner,et al.  Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[3]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[4]  J. Watrous,et al.  Necessary and sufficient quantum information characterization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[5]  Matthias Troyer,et al.  Neural-network quantum state tomography , 2018 .

[6]  V. Scarani,et al.  One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution: Security, feasibility, and the connection with steering , 2011, 1109.1435.

[7]  Miguel Navascués,et al.  Quantifying Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[8]  Ronald Davis,et al.  Neural networks and deep learning , 2017 .

[9]  E. Schrödinger.  Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems , 1935, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[10]  Xiang-Jun Ye,et al.  Mapping criteria between nonlocality and steerability in qudit-qubit systems and between steerability and entanglement in qubit-qudit systems , 2018, Physical Review A.

[11]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Semidefinite Programming , 1996, SIAM Rev..

[12]  H. M. Wiseman,et al.  Experimental criteria for steering and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 2009, 0907.1109.

[13]  Dong Wang,et al.  Experimental observation of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering via entanglement detection , 2020 .

[14]  Gerardo Adesso,et al.  Hierarchy of Steering Criteria Based on Moments for All Bipartite Quantum Systems. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[15]  V. Scarani,et al.  Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[16]  R. Melko,et al.  Machine Learning Phases of Strongly Correlated Fermions , 2016, Physical Review X.

[17]  Eric G. Cavalcanti,et al.  Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering inequalities from entropic uncertainty relations , 2013, 1303.7432.

[18]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[19]  Naftali Tishby,et al.  Machine learning and the physical sciences , 2019, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[20]  D. Das,et al.  Detecting Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering through entanglement detection , 2018, Physical Review A.

[21]  A. S. Majumdar,et al.  Cost of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering in the context of extremal boxes. , 2017, 1702.00672.

[22]  Franco Nori,et al.  Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering: Its geometric quantification and witness , 2017, 1709.06703.

[23]  Dong-Ling Deng,et al.  Machine Learning Detection of Bell Nonlocality in Quantum Many-Body Systems. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[24]  Nobuyuki Yoshioka,et al.  Learning disordered topological phases by statistical recovery of symmetry , 2017, 1709.05790.

[25]  Rafael Chaves,et al.  Machine Learning Nonlocal Correlations. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[26]  Yeong-Cherng Liang,et al.  Quantum steerability: Characterization, quantification, superactivation, and unbounded amplification , 2016, 1609.07581.

[27]  A C Doherty,et al.  Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[28]  Changbo Chen,et al.  Steerability detection of an arbitrary two-qubit state via machine learning , 2019, Physical Review A.

[29]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Introduction to the Tenth Anniversary Edition , 2010 .

[30]  Paul Skrzypczyk,et al.  Optimal randomness certification in the quantum steering and prepare-and-measure scenarios , 2015, 1504.08302.

[31]  S. Walborn,et al.  Revealing hidden Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen nonlocality. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[32]  Marc Kaplan,et al.  Fine-grained Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-steering inequalities , 2014 .

[33]  Xiaoting Wang,et al.  Conditional mutual information and quantum steering , 2016, 1612.03875.