A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition

In this article it is argued that language can be seen as a dynamic system, i.e. a set of variables that interact over time, and that language development can be seen as a dynamic process. Language development shows some of the core characteristics of dynamic systems: sensitive dependence on initial conditions, complete interconnectedness of subsystems, the emergence of attractor states in development over time and variation both in and among individuals. The application of tools and instruments developed for the study of dynamic systems in other disciplines calls for different approaches to research, which allow for the inclusion of both the social and the cognitive, and the interaction between systems. There is also a need for dense data bases on first and second language development to enhance our understanding of the fine-grained patterns of change over time. Dynamic Systems Theory is proposed as a candidate for an overall theory of language development.

[1]  Wander Lowie,et al.  Second Language Acquisition: An Advanced Resource Book , 2006 .

[2]  Diane Larsen-Freeman.  Chapter 10. Second Language Acquisition and the Issue of Fossilization: There Is No End, and There Is No State , 2005 .

[3]  Wander Lowie,et al.  Dynamic Systems Theory and Applied Linguistics: the ultimate “so what”? , 2005 .

[4]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Linguistic Cues Enhance the Learning of Perceptual Cues , 2005, Psychological science.

[5]  A. Hatoss.  Review of Herdina & Jessner (2002): A dynamic model of multilingualism:perspectives of change in psycholinguistics , 2005 .

[6]  Marijn van Dijk.  Child language cuts capers : variability and ambiguity in early child develpment , 2004 .

[7]  Wander Lowie,et al.  Dynamic systems theory and variation: a case study in L2-writing , 2004 .

[8]  Marijn Woutera Geertje.  Child language cuts capers : variability and ambiguity in early child develpment , 2004 .

[9]  N. Cowan.  Comparisons of developmental modeling frameworks and levels of analysis in cognition: connectionist and dynamic systems theories deserve attention, but don’t yet explain attention , 2003 .

[10]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Iterated Learning: A Framework for the Emergence of Language , 2003, Artificial Life.

[11]  M. V. Dijk,et al.  Disentangling behavior in early child development Interpretability of early child language and the problem of filler syllables and growing utterance length , 2003 .

[12]  B. King,et al.  The emergence of a new paradigm in ape language research , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  T. Zentall.  A multichannel information-processing system is simpler and more easily tested , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  Chris Westbury.  Blind men, elephants, and dancing information processors , 2002 .

[15]  J. Valsiner,et al.  Doesn't a dance require dancers? , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  P. Niyogi,et al.  Computational and evolutionary aspects of language , 2002, Nature.

[17]  B. Weltens,et al.  Between Two Worlds. Social Networks, Language Shift and Language Processing in Three Generations of Dutch Migrants in New Zealand. , 2002 .

[18]  L. Gogate,et al.  The intersensory origins of word‐comprehension: an ecological–dynamic systems view , 2001 .

[19]  M A Nowak,et al.  Evolution of universal grammar. , 2001, Science.

[20]  Lynne Hansen.  Language attrition: the fate of the start , 2001, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[21]  In search of yesterday's words: reactivating a long-forgotten language , 2000 .

[22]  R. Sparks,et al.  Déjà Vu All Over Again: A Response to Saito, Horwitz, and Garza , 2000 .

[23]  K. Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  Trends and Transitions in Language Development: Looking for the Missing Piece , 1999 .

[24]  M. Voeten,et al.  Native language literacy and phonological memory as prerequisites for learning English as a foreign language , 1999, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[25]  David L. Cooper,et al.  Linguistic Attractors: The Cognitive Dynamics of Language Acquisition and Change (review) , 1999, Modern Language Review.

[26]  T. Gelder,et al.  The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  C. Mervis,et al.  Disentangling early language development: modeling lexical and grammatical acquisition using an extension of case-study methodology. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[28]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Twenty-Five Years of Research on the Reading Process: The Grand Synthesis and What It Means for Our Field. , 1998 .

[29]  T. Deacon.  The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain , 1998 .

[30]  D. Larsen-Freeman.  Chaos/Complexity Science and Second Language Acquisition , 1997 .

[31]  B. MacWhinney.  Second language acquisition and the competition model , 1997 .

[32]  W. Labov.  Some Notes on the Role of Misperception in Language Learning , 1996 .

[33]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. , 2007, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[34]  Jon M. Patton,et al.  Prediction of performance in first-year foreign language courses: Connections between native and foreign language learning. , 1995 .

[35]  T. Gelder,et al.  Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition , 1995 .

[36]  P. V. Geert.  DIMENSIONS OF CHANGE - A SEMANTIC AND MATHEMATICAL-ANALYSIS OF LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT , 1995 .

[37]  P. V. Geert.  Vygotskian dynamics of development. , 1994 .

[38]  K. Bot,et al.  A 16‐year longitudinal study of language attrition in Dutch immigrants in Australia , 1994 .

[39]  W. Nagy,et al.  Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. , 1993 .

[40]  E. Bates,et al.  Language comprehension in ape and child. , 1993, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[41]  Kenji Hakuta,et al.  Some Properties of Bilingual Maintenance and Loss in Mexican Background High-School Students , 1992 .

[42]  Leonore Ganschow,et al.  Foreign language learning differences: Affective or native language aptitude differences? , 1991 .

[43]  J. Hedgcock.  Foreign Language Retention and Attrition: A Study of Regression Models , 1991 .

[44]  Paul van Geert,et al.  A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. , 1991 .

[45]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. , 1992 .

[46]  H. P. Bahrick.  Fifty Years of Second Language Attrition: Implications for Programmatic Research , 1984 .

[47]  U. Neisser.  Interpreting Harry Bahrick's discovery: what confers immunity against forgetting? , 1984 .

[48]  D. Larsen-Freeman.  AN EXPLANATION FOR THE MORPHEME ACQUISITION ORDER OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS , 1976 .

[49]  D. Freeman,et al.  The Acquisition of Grammatical Morphemes by Adult ESL Students. , 1975 .

[50]  Carolyn G. Madden,et al.  IS THERE A “NATURAL SEQUENCE” IN ADULT SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING? , 1974 .

[51]  Kenji Hakuta,et al.  A Preliminary Report on the Development of Grammatical Morphemes in a Japanese Girl Learning English as a Second Language. Working Papers on Bilingualism, No. 3. , 1974 .

[52]  Marina K. Burt,et al.  NATURAL SEQUENCES IN CHILD SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION1 , 1974 .

[53]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .