Enzymatic and immunological characterization of the Mycobacterium fortuitum complex

The arylsulfatase isozymes of Mycobacterium fortuitum, M. peregrinum, M. chelonei subsp. chelonei, and M. chelonei subsp. abscessus were examined to determine the isozymal and immunological relationship among the members of the M. fortuitum complex. Cell extracts were subjected to electrophoresis on agarose and polyacrylamide gel, and arylsulfatase activity was localized using beta-naphthyl sulfate as substrate. Unique zymograms were produced for M. fortuitum, M. peregrinum, and M. chelonei which were characteristic for each species. The immunological relationship among the sulfatases was assayed by using immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis followed by sulfatase staining for the enzyme. One of the isozymes of M. fortuitum and M. peregrinum cross-reacted, showing immunological identity. Antisera to sulfatases of M. fortuitum and M. peregrinum did not react with sulfatases of M. chelonei. The characterization of sulfatase isozymes in extracts of organisms in the M. fortuitum complex suggests the division of the M. fortuitum complex into two species, M. fortuitum and M. chelonei, with subspecies designations.

[1]  G. Kubica Differential identification of mycobacteria. VII. Key features for identification of clinically significant mycobacteria. , 1973, The American review of respiratory disease.

[2]  G. Kubica,et al.  A co-operative numerical analysis of rapidly growing mycobacteria. , 1972, Journal of general microbiology.

[3]  F. Portaels,et al.  Studies on Mycobacterium chelonei. , 1972, Journal of medical microbiology.

[4]  P. Jenkins,et al.  Lipid chromatography and seroagglutination in the classification of rapidly growing mycobacteria. , 1971, The American review of respiratory disease.

[5]  M. Tsukamura Differentiation between Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium borstelense. , 1970, The American review of respiratory disease.

[6]  J. Stanford,et al.  Serological and Bacteriological Investigation of Mycobacterium ranae (fortuitum) , 1969, Journal of bacteriology.

[7]  K. Takeya,et al.  Esterase Zymogram Method for classifying Mycobacteria , 1967, Nature.

[8]  W. Schaefer Serologic identification and classification of the atypical mycobacteria by their agglutination. , 2015, The American review of respiratory disease.

[9]  B. Davis DISC ELECTROPHORESIS – II METHOD AND APPLICATION TO HUMAN SERUM PROTEINS * , 1964, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Z. Reggiardo ANTIGENIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG MYCOBACTERIA BY AGGLUTINATION AND AGGLUTININ-ABSORPTION REACTIONS. , 1964, American Review of Respiratory Disease.

[11]  H. Albrycht,et al.  [Immunodiffusion]. , 2020, Postepy higieny i medycyny doswiadczalnej.

[12]  O. Ouchterlony,et al.  Diffusion-in-gel methods for immunological analysis. II. , 1962, Progress in allergy.

[13]  M. Dittebrandt Application of the Weichselbaum biuret reagent to the determination of spinal fluid protein. , 1948, American journal of clinical pathology.

[14]  S. T. Cowan Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology , 1948, Nature.