The team absorptive capacity triad: a configurational study of individual, enabling, and motivating factors

Purpose The paper aims to understand how knowledge-intensive teams can develop and enhance their team absorptive capacity (ACAP) level, by exploring whether individual and organizational factors are complements or substitutes for team ACAP. Design/methodology/approach The study applies a configurational approach using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to identify combinations of individual and team factors that are associated with team ACAP. Data were gathered through a survey among 297 employees of four medium-sized Dutch firms, working in 48 functional teams. Findings The primary finding is that knowledge-intensive team ACAP depends on a triad of complementary factors: team members’ individual ACAP, factors that enable knowledge integration and factors that motivate knowledge integration. Underdevelopment of one or more factors leads to lower team ACAP. Research limitations/implications The study contributes to the discussion on the locus of knowledge-creation and enhances understandings of why knowledge-intensive teams differ in knowledge processing capabilities. It suggests future research on cross-functional teams in new ventures and large firms. Practical implications The paper informs managers and team leaders about the factors that determine knowledge-intensive teams’ ACAP, enabling them to develop team-specific strategies to increase their teams’ performance. Originality/value The study takes a holistic perspective on knowledge-intensive team ACAP by using a configurational approach. It also highlights the potential of team-level research in the knowledge management literature for both researchers and practitioners.

[1]  G. Hodgson.  The Mirage of Microfoundations , 2012 .

[2]  Gary Goertz,et al.  The Methodology of Necessary Conditions , 2000 .

[3]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[4]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of product innovations: defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion behavior , 2005 .

[5]  Teppo Felin,et al.  The endogenous origins of experience, routines, and organizational capabilities: the poverty of stimulus , 2010, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[6]  W. Starbuck.  Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[7]  Adedapo Oluwaseyi Ojo,et al.  Individual antecedents of ACAP and implications of social context in joint engineering project teams: a conceptual model , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Reducing complexity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Remote and proximate factors and the consolidation of democracy , 2006 .

[9]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[10]  Suzanne Zyngier,et al.  A model of rapid knowledge development: The smaller born-global firm , 2010 .

[11]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Formative versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration , 2006 .

[12]  Teppo Felin,et al.  The Knowledge-Based View, Nested Heterogeneity, and New Value Creation: Philosophical Considerations on the Locus of Knowledge , 2007 .

[13]  S. Jackson,et al.  The Internal and External Networks of Knowledge-Intensive Teams , 2013 .

[14]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams , 2012 .

[15]  R. Keller,et al.  The Impact of Team‐Member Exchange, Differentiation, Team Commitment, and Knowledge Sharing on R&D Project Team Performance , 2011 .

[16]  Z. Zhao,et al.  A multilevel perspective on knowledge transfer: evidence from the Chinese automotive industry , 2009 .

[17]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Venture team human capital and absorptive capacity in high technology new ventures , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[18]  Sze-Sze Wong,et al.  Distal and Local Group Learning: Performance Trade-offs and Tensions , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[19]  S. Faraj,et al.  Boundary work in knowledge teams. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  Andrew A. King,et al.  Prospects for Developing Absorptive Capacity Through Internal Information Provision , 2004 .

[22]  E. Autio,et al.  Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth , 2000 .

[23]  Wynne W. Chin.  How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses , 2010 .

[24]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[25]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[26]  Jonathan A. Rhoades,et al.  The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors , 2000 .

[27]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[28]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[29]  Oswald Jones,et al.  Developing Absorptive Capacity in Mature Organizations , 2006 .

[30]  M. Alvesson.  Knowledge Work And Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 2004 .

[31]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[32]  Dean A. Shepherd,et al.  International Entrepreneurship Leveraging Internal and External Knowledge Sources , 2009 .

[33]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations , 1988 .

[34]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Absorptive Capacity in R&D Project Teams: A Conceptualization and Empirical Test , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[35]  J. Barney,et al.  What Are Microfoundations? , 2013 .

[36]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[37]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[38]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[39]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  Modeling the Multilevel Determinants of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2005 .

[40]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[41]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[42]  Jorge F. S. Gomes,et al.  Critical success factors for cross‐functional teamwork in new product development , 2000 .

[43]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[44]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[45]  Tammy L. Madsen,et al.  Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure , 2012 .

[46]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[47]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[48]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[49]  C. Lance,et al.  What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research , 2010 .

[50]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[51]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[52]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[53]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[54]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[55]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets: Agenda for a Research Approach and a Data Analysis Technique , 2010 .

[56]  Jesper B. Sørensen.  The Strength of Corporate Culture and the Reliability of Firm Performance , 2002 .

[57]  Peter Y. T. Sun,et al.  Five critical knowledge management organizational themes , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[58]  Peter Y. T. Sun,et al.  An Examination of the Relationship between Absorptive Capacity and Organizational Learning, and a Proposed Integration , 2008 .

[59]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Building Micro-foundations for the Routines, Capabilities, and Performance Links , 2007 .

[60]  Thorbjørn Knudsen,et al.  Poverty of stimulus and absence of cause: some questions for Felin and Foss , 2011, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[61]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in 5's: A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design , 1980, Management Science.

[62]  Anders Paarup Nielsen,et al.  Understanding dynamic capabilities through knowledge management , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[63]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  The Structural Context of Team Learning: Effects of Organizational and Team Structure on Internal and External Learning , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[64]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets , 2010 .

[65]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[66]  T. Pedersen,et al.  MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM , 2003 .

[67]  S. Newell,et al.  Managing Knowledge Work , 2002 .

[68]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[69]  Henrik Bresman,et al.  External Learning Activities and Team Performance: A Multimethod Field Study , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[70]  Boris Durisin,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization , 2007 .

[71]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[72]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[73]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[74]  Sharon F. Matusik,et al.  Absorptive Capacity in the Software Industry: Identifying Dimensions That Affect Knowledge and Knowledge Creation Activities , 2005 .

[75]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[76]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[77]  Thomas Greckhamer,et al.  Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Strategic Management Research , 2008 .

[78]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Co-evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities , 1999 .

[79]  Jeroen Kraaijenbrink,et al.  The Effects of Prior Knowledge, Networks, and Cognitive Style on Individuals' Absorptive Capacity , 2012 .

[80]  Teppo Felin,et al.  The (Proper) Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: A Response to Winter, Pentland, Hodgson and Knudsen , 2011 .

[81]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[82]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field , 2009 .

[83]  Peer C. Fiss.  A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations , 2007 .

[84]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[85]  Peer C. Fiss.  Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .