Derivation and External Validation of a Scoring System for Predicting Fracture Risk After Ischemic Stroke in a Canadian Cohort.

Importance The risk for low-trauma fracture is increased by more than 30% after ischemic stroke, but existing fracture risk scores do not account for history of stroke as a high-risk condition. Objective To derive a risk score to predict the probability of fracture within 1 year after ischemic stroke and validate it in a separate cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants Prognostic study of a cohort from the Ontario Stroke Registry, a population-based sample of adults in Ontario, Canada, who were hospitalized with ischemic stroke from July 1, 2003, to March 31, 2012, with 1 year of follow-up. A population-based validation cohort consisted of a sample of 13 698 consecutive stroke admissions captured across 5 years: April 2002 to March 2003, April 2004 to March 2005, April 2008 to March 2009, April 2010 to March 2011, and April 2012 to March 2013. Exposures Predictor variables were selected based on biological plausibility and association with fracture risk. Age, sex, and modified Rankin score were abstracted from the medical records part of the Ontario Stroke Audit, and other characteristics were abstracted from administrative health data. Main Outcomes and Measures Incidence of low-trauma fracture within 1 year of discharge, based on administrative health data. Results The Fracture Risk after Ischemic Stroke (FRAC-Stroke) Score was derived in 20 435 patients hospitalized for ischemic stroke (mean [SD] age, 71.6 [14.0] years; 9564 [46.8%] women) from the Ontario Stroke Registry discharged from July 1, 2003, to March 31, 2012, using Fine-Gray competing risk regression. Low-trauma fracture occurred within 1 year of discharge in 741 of the 20 435 patients (3.6%) in the derivation cohort. Age, discharge modified Rankin score (mRS), and history of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, falls, and previous fracture were associated with the cumulative incidence of low trauma fracture in the derivation cohort. Model discrimination in the validation cohort (n = 13 698) was good (C statistic, 0.70). Discharge mRS was an important discriminator of risk (relative integrated discrimination improvement, 8.7%), with highest risk in patients with mRS 3 and 4 but lowest in bedbound patients (mRS 5). From the lowest to the highest FRAC-Stroke quintile, the cumulative incidence of 1-year low-trauma fracture increased from 1.3% to 9.0% in the validation cohort. Predicted and observed rates of fracture were similar in the external validation cohort. Analysis was conducted from July 2016 to January 2019. Conclusions and Relevance The FRAC-Stroke score allows the clinician to identify ischemic stroke survivors at higher risk of low-trauma fracture within 1 year of hospital discharge. This information might be used to select patients for interventions to prevent fractures.

[1]  K. Furie,et al.  Scoring System to Optimize Pioglitazone Therapy After Stroke Based on Fracture Risk , 2019, Stroke.

[2]  M. Phipps,et al.  Screening for Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2018, JAMA.

[3]  Chyke A Doubeni,et al.  Vitamin D, Calcium, or Combined Supplementation for the Primary Prevention of Fractures in Community-Dwelling Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2018, JAMA.

[4]  J. Potter,et al.  Long-Term Factors Associated With Falls and Fractures Poststroke , 2018, Front. Neurol..

[5]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models: Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature , 2017, JAMA.

[6]  P. Austin,et al.  Risk of fractures after stroke , 2017, Neurology.

[7]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Developing points‐based risk‐scoring systems in the presence of competing risks , 2016, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  P. Austin,et al.  Association between hospitalization and care after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke , 2016, Neurology.

[9]  C. Molina,et al.  Ischemic stroke outcome: A review of the influence of post-stroke complications within the different scenarios of stroke care. , 2016, European journal of internal medicine.

[10]  Jason P. Fine,et al.  Statistical Primer for Cardiovascular Research Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks , 2022 .

[11]  M. Pencina,et al.  Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models. , 2012, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  L. Lisabeth,et al.  Poststroke fractures in a bi-ethnic community. , 2012, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[13]  Olga V. Demler,et al.  Novel metrics for evaluating improvement in discrimination: net reclassification and integrated discrimination improvement for normal variables and nested models , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  F. Silver,et al.  The Registry of Canadian Stroke Network : an evolving methodology. , 2011, Acta neurologica Taiwanica.

[15]  David A Hanley,et al.  2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary , 2010, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[16]  V. Hachinski,et al.  The Canadian Neurological Scale and the NIHSS: Development and Validation of a Simple Conversion Model , 2010, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[17]  Frank de Vries,et al.  Risk of Hip/Femur Fracture After Stroke: A Population-Based Case-Control Study , 2009, Stroke.

[18]  S. Carda,et al.  Osteoporosis after Stroke: A Review of the Causes and Potential Treatments , 2009, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[19]  O. Johnell,et al.  FRAX™ and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK , 2008, Osteoporosis International.

[20]  L. Lisabeth,et al.  Risk of Fractures after Stroke , 2007, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[21]  E. Warburton,et al.  Hip fractures after stroke and their prevention. , 2007, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[22]  Henry L. Lew,et al.  Bone-density changes after stroke. , 2006, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[23]  J. Kanis,et al.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk , 2002, The Lancet.

[24]  M. Dennis,et al.  Fractures After Stroke: Frequency, Types, and Associations , 2002, Stroke.

[25]  O. Johnell,et al.  Acute and Long-Term Increase in Fracture Risk After Hospitalization for Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[26]  W. Ray,et al.  Identification of fractures from computerized Medicare files. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[27]  V Hachinski,et al.  The Canadian Neurological Scale , 1989, Neurology.

[28]  M. Pencina,et al.  A SAS ® Macro to Compute Added Predictive Ability of New Markers Predicting a Dichotomous Outcome , 2010 .

[29]  O. Johnell,et al.  Risk of Hip Fracture Derived from Relative Risks: An Analysis Applied to the Population of Sweden , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[30]  A. Ramnemark,et al.  Progressive Hemiosteoporosis on the Paretic Side and Increased Bone Mineral Density in the Nonparetic Arm the First Year after Severe Stroke , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[31]  A. Ramnemark,et al.  Fractures after Stroke , 1998, Osteoporosis International.