Investigation of the limits of nanoscale filopodial interactions

Mesenchymal stem cells are sensitive to changes in feature height, order and spacing. We had previously noted that there was an inverse relationship between osteoinductive potential and feature height on 15-, 55- and 90 nm-high titania nanopillars, with 15 nm-high pillars being the most effective substrate at inducing osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. The osteoinductive effect was somewhat diminished by decreasing the feature height to 8 nm, however, which suggested that there was a cut-off point, potentially associated with a change in cell–nanofeature interactions. To investigate this further, in this study, a scanning electron microscopy/three-dimensional scanning electron microscopy approach was used to examine the interactions between mesenchymal stem cells and the 8 and 15 nm nanopillared surfaces. As expected, the cells adopted a predominantly filopodial mode of interaction with the 15 nm-high pillars. Interestingly, fine nanoscale membrane projections, which we have termed ‘nanopodia,’ were also employed by the cells on the 8 nm pillars, and it seems that this is analogous to the cells ‘clinging on with their fingertips’ to this scale of features.

[1]  B. Su,et al.  2D and 3D Nanopatterning of Titanium for Enhancing Osteoinduction of Stem Cells at Implant Surfaces , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.

[2]  V. Vogel,et al.  The role of filopodia in the recognition of nanotopographies , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[3]  E. Evans,et al.  Observing force-regulated conformational changes and ligand dissociation from a single integrin on cells , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Using nanotopography and metabolomics to identify biochemical effectors of multipotency. , 2012, ACS nano.

[5]  P. Moghe,et al.  Skeletal stem cell physiology on functionally distinct titania nanotopographies. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[6]  N. Gadegaard,et al.  Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. , 2011, Nature materials.

[7]  J. Lovmand,et al.  Focal complex maturation and bridging on 200 nm vitronectin but not fibronectin patches reveal different mechanisms of focal adhesion formation. , 2011, Nano letters.

[8]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Matthew J. Dalby,et al.  Nanotopographical Control of Stem Cell Differentiation , 2010, Journal of tissue engineering.

[10]  R Geoff Richards,et al.  The use of nanoscale topography to modulate the dynamics of adhesion formation in primary osteoblasts and ERK/MAPK signalling in STRO-1+ enriched skeletal stem cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[11]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Impact of order and disorder in RGD nanopatterns on cell adhesion. , 2009, Nano letters.

[12]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[13]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[14]  R. Oreffo,et al.  Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[15]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[16]  Mark Ellisman,et al.  Spatial mapping of integrin interactions and dynamics during cell migration by Image Correlation Microscopy , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[17]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[18]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: a brief report using SEM to image the interaction between 10 nm high nano‐topography and fibroblast filopodia , 2004, Cell biology international.

[19]  N. Green,et al.  Electron microscopy and structural model of human fibronectin receptor. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[20]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[21]  A. Curtis,et al.  Rapid fibroblast adhesion to 27nm high polymer demixed nano-topography. , 2004, Biomaterials.