Efficient grasping requires attentional resources

We investigated the effects of visuo-spatial attention on the kinematics of grasping movements by employing a dual-task paradigm. Participants had to grasp cylindrical objects of different sizes (motor task) while simultaneously identifying a target digit presented at a different spatial location within a rapid serial visual presentation (perceptual task). The grasping kinematics in this dual-task situation were compared with the those measured in a single-task condition. Likewise, the identification performance was also measured in a single-task condition. Additionally, we kept the visual input constant across conditions by asking participants to fixate. Without instructions about the priority of tasks (Experiment 1) participants showed a considerable drop of identification performance in the dual-task condition. Regarding grasping kinematics, the concurrent perceptual task resulted in a less accurate adaptation of the grip to object size in the early phase of the movement, while movement times and maximum grip aperture were unaffected. When participants were instructed to focus on the perceptual task (Experiment 2), the identification performance stayed at about the same level in the dual-task and the single-task conditions. The perceptual improvement was however associated with a further decrease in the accuracy of the early grip adjustment. We conclude that visual attention is needed for the effective control of the grasp kinematics, especially for a precise adjustment of the hand to object size when approaching the object.

[1]  H. Deubel,et al.  Independent Allocation of Attention to Eye and Hand Targets in Coordinated Eye-Hand Movements , 2011, Psychological science.

[2]  R Uwer,et al.  Effects of dual task demands on the accuracy of smooth pursuit eye movements. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[3]  W. Schneider VAM: A neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action , 1995 .

[4]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[5]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Dissociation of covert and overt spatial attention during prehension movements: Selective interference effects , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  S. Jackson,et al.  Are non-relevant objects represented in working memory? The effect of non-target objects on reach and grasp kinematics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Visual and cognitive control of attention in smooth pursuit. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[8]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  R. Passingham,et al.  The left parietal cortex and motor attention , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience : a reader , 2000 .

[11]  M. Arbib,et al.  Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Interference from Distractors in Reach-to-grasp Movements , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Deployment of visual attention before sequences of goal-directed hand movements , 2006, Vision Research.

[14]  H. Heuer,et al.  Perspectives on Perception and Action , 1989 .

[15]  H. Deubel,et al.  Attentional landscapes in reaching and grasping , 2010, Vision Research.

[16]  H. Deubel,et al.  Selective Dorsal and Ventral Processing: Evidence for a Common Attentional Mechanism in Reaching and Perception , 1998 .

[17]  S. B. Hutton,et al.  The effects of dividing attention on smooth pursuit eye tracking , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  H. Deubel,et al.  Visual attention during the preparation of bimanual movements , 2008, Vision Research.

[19]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[20]  M. Jeannerod Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[21]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement , 1990, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  P. Baltes,et al.  Walking While Memorizing: Age-Related Differences in Compensatory Behavior , 2001, Psychological science.

[23]  Accepted April,et al.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension , 1991 .

[24]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Attentional selection during preparation of prehension movements , 2003 .

[25]  O. Neumann Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention , 1987 .

[26]  A. Allport,et al.  Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action , 1987 .

[27]  D. Broadbent Task combination and selective intake of information. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[28]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Reaching to Grasp: Evidence for Distractor Interference Effects , 1997 .

[29]  U. Castiello Grasping a fruit: selection for action. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Automatic and controlled processing revisited. , 1984, Psychological review.

[32]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[33]  P. Gelder,et al.  Anticipatory saccades in smooth pursuit: Task effects and pursuit vector after saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[34]  Tristan T. Nakagawa,et al.  Bimanual movement control is moderated by fixation strategies , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  J. J. D. Gon,et al.  Reaction-time-dependent differences in the initial movement direction of fast goal-directed arm movements , 1991 .

[36]  U. Castiello The neuroscience of grasping , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Attentional selection in sequential manual movements, movements around an obstacle and in grasping , 2005 .

[38]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Space and selective attention , 1994 .

[40]  Torsten Schubert,et al.  The central attentional limitation and executive control. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[41]  Paul Milgram,et al.  A spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope , 1987 .

[42]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[43]  Valerie E. Kelly,et al.  Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[46]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.