Pitfalls in nonrandomized outcomes studies. The case of incidental appendectomy with open cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVES To assess the short-term outcomes of incidental appendectomy through analysis of hospital administrative data and determine the consistency and plausibility of the observed results. DESIGN Population-based historical cohort study. SETTING All general hospitals in Ontario between 1981 and 1990. PATIENTS Patients undergoing open primary cholecystectomy with (7846 exposed) and without (191,599 unexposed) incidental appendectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES In-hospital fatality rates, complication rates, and lengths of hospital stay. RESULTS Crude comparisons showed a striking and paradoxical reduction in mortality after cholecystectomy when incidental appendectomy was performed (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.57; P < .001); mean length of stay was also lower by -0.46 day (P < .001). After adjustment for confounding differences, such as comorbidity and nonelective surgery, mortality and lengths of stay were similar for exposed and unexposed patients; but exposed patients showed a significant increase in nonfatal complications (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.39 to 1.68; P < .001). Adverse effects from incidental appendectomy emerged consistently for all three outcomes only after restricting the analysis to subgroups of patients at low surgical risk. The increased mortality for exposed patients was largest among low-risk groups; for example, among those younger than 70 years undergoing elective surgery, the OR was 2.65 (95% CI, 1.25 to 5.64; P < .001). CONCLUSION These findings suggest that incidental appendectomy is associated with a small but definite increase in adverse postoperative outcomes. However, plausible and consistent findings were only obtained after restricting the analysis to low-risk subgroups in which unmeasured differences in patients' baseline characteristics were less likely to confound adjusted outcome comparisons. This exercise highlights the potential pitfalls in nonrandomized outcomes comparisons using data sources with limited clinical detail, such as hospital discharge abstracts.

[1]  H. Stone,et al.  Safety of incidental appendectomy. , 1983, American Journal of Surgery.

[2]  R. Deyo,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  Jesse Green,et al.  How Accurate are Hospital Discharge Data for Evaluating Effectiveness of Care? , 1993, Medical care.

[4]  S Greenfield,et al.  The state of outcome research: are we on target? , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Waters Eg.  Elective appendectomy with abdominal and pelvic surgery. , 1977 .

[6]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[7]  D McLerran,et al.  Further study of the increased mortality following transurethral prostatectomy: a chart-based analysis. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[8]  E. DeLong,et al.  Discordance of Databases Designed for Claims Payment versus Clinical Information Systems: Implications for Outcomes Research , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  Bogart Jn,et al.  Incidental appendectomy and its effect on the incidence of wound infection in cholecystectomy. , 1969 .

[10]  C. Lowery,et al.  Incidental appendectomy in gallbladder surgery. , 1962, Archives of surgery.

[11]  P. V. Dilts,et al.  Appendectomy incidental to postpartum sterilization procedures. , 1973, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  Shumake Lb.  Right inguinal herniorrhaphy and incidental appendectomy. , 1971 .

[13]  M. Evans,et al.  Wound sepsis after cholecystectomy: effect of incidental appendicectomy. , 1977, British medical journal.

[14]  J Lubitz,et al.  Medicare Beneficiaries: Adverse Outcomes After Hospitalization for Eight Procedures , 1993, Medical care.

[15]  H. Brønnum-Hansen,et al.  Elevated Mortality Following Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Hypertrophy!: But Why? , 1990, Medical care.

[16]  R. Tauxe,et al.  The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[17]  P E Dans,et al.  Looking for Answers in All the Wrong Places , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  K McPherson,et al.  Mortality and reoperation after open and transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  J. Concato,et al.  Problems of comorbidity in mortality after prostatectomy. , 1992, JAMA.

[20]  D. Edwards,et al.  Incidence and costs of incidental appendectomy as a preventive measure. , 1987, American journal of public health.

[21]  C. Naylor.  Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine , 1995, The Lancet.