Experimental Verification of Vertical Joints in an Innovative Prefabricated Structural Wall System

In order to verify the viability of the new-type vertical joints (composed of high-strength bolts, connecting steel frames, embedded limbic steel frames, and steel sleeves) in an innovative prefabricated structural wall (IPSW) system, low-cyclic reversed loading tests (pseudo-static tests) were performed on two H-shaped test specimens fabricating from precast web wall panel and precast flange wall panels joined together through the novel vertical joints. On the basis of the loading procedure and test data, the global behavior (including failure modes, lateral stiffness, ductility, and energy-dissipating capacity) and the local performance (including the stress distribution in the connecting steel frames and the relative slippages between the connection components) of the test specimens were detailedly discussed and presented. The research results demonstrated that the connectors were strong enough for maintaining the web wall panel and flange wall panels work together as an entirety to resist lateral seismic force, no slippages occurred on the contact interfaces between the connecting steel frame and embedded limbic steel frame throughout the loading procedure, and the vertical shear stress at the midpoint of the connecting steel frame (close to zero) was far smaller than that at its lower end (still much less than its yield strength). This experimental research confirms the viability and reliability of the new-type vertical joints, although the configurations of the precast wall panel as well as the vertical joints need indispensable improving to optimize the seismic performance of the entire test specimen.

[1]  Milo Milo Shemie BOLTED CONNECTIONS IN LARGE PANEL SYSTEM BUILDINGS , 1973 .

[2]  Mark Fintel,et al.  A philosophy for structural integrity of large panel buildings , 1976 .

[3]  Hsm Abdul-Wahab,et al.  PREDICTION OF ULTIMATE SHEAR STRENGTH OF VERTICAL JOINTS IN LARGE PANEL STRUCTURES , 1991 .

[4]  O. A. Pekau,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF FRICTION JOINTED PRECAST PANEL SHEAR WALLS , 1991 .

[5]  Maher K. Tadros,et al.  Full scale testing of precast concrete sandwich panels , 1997 .

[6]  Stephen Pessiki,et al.  Seismic behavior and design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete frames , 1999 .

[7]  Wang Dongwei,et al.  Experimental and theoretical study on seismic behavior of vertical connection in PBPS under repeated loading , 2003 .

[8]  Michael G. Oliva,et al.  Development of a precast concrete shear-wall system requiring special code acceptance , 2007 .

[9]  David Z. Yankelevsky,et al.  On Potential Progressive Failure of Large-Panel Buildings , 2007 .

[10]  S. Pessiki,et al.  Analytical and Experimental Lateral Load Behavior of Unbonded Posttensioned Precast Concrete Walls , 2007 .

[11]  Shentong Lin Hysteretic behavior of simi-rigid composite steel frame with reinforced concrete infill wall in column weak axis , 2008 .

[12]  Yahya C. Kurama,et al.  Design and Measured Behavior of a Hybrid Precast Concrete Wall Specimen for Seismic Regions , 2011 .

[13]  Alberto Pavese,et al.  Experimental assessment of the seismic performance of a prefabricated concrete structural wall system , 2011 .

[14]  Li Wenqing Quasi-static test of precast reinforced concrete shear wall structure , 2011 .

[15]  Yan Hong-ying,et al.  Experimental study on plug-in filling hole for steel bar anchorage of the PC structure , 2011 .

[16]  Li Jianshu,et al.  Tests on seismic behavior of pre-cast shear walls with various methods of vertical reinforcement splicing , 2011 .

[17]  Jian Hongbin,et al.  Pseudo-dynamic substructure test on precast reinforced concrete shear wall structure , 2011 .

[18]  Sri Sritharan,et al.  Defining Concrete Compressive Strain in Unbonded Post-Tensioned Walls , 2012 .

[19]  Liu Weiqing,et al.  Experimental study on seismic behavior of reinforced concrete composite shear wall with level splice , 2012 .

[20]  Chang-Sik Choi,et al.  Development and testing of precast concrete beam-to-column connections , 2013 .

[21]  Brian J. Smith,et al.  Behavior of Precast Concrete Shear Walls for Seismic Regions: Comparison of Hybrid and Emulative Specimens , 2013 .

[22]  Jamal A. Abdalla,et al.  Simplified Optimum Design Procedure for Special Unbonded Posttensioned Split Precast Shear Walls , 2013 .

[23]  Paolo Negro,et al.  Pseudodynamic tests on a full-scale 3-storey precast concrete building: behavior of the mechanical connections and floor diaphragms , 2013 .

[24]  Paolo Negro,et al.  Pseudodynamic Tests on a Full-Scale 3-Storey Precast Concrete Building: Global Response , 2013 .

[25]  S. Pessiki,et al.  Experimental Lateral Load Response of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls , 2013 .

[26]  Andrea Belleri,et al.  Dynamic behavior of rocking and hybrid cantilever walls in a precast concrete building , 2014 .