Quitting smoking: estimation by meta-analysis of the rate of unaided smoking cessation.

The rates (after 12 months' follow-up) of unassisted smoking cessation reported in the literature have varied from 13.8 per cent to 8.5 per cent. A meta-analysis was conducted of the abstinence rates observed in 14 samples of smokers who presented at primary health settings and received either no intervention aimed at smoking or usual care (which involved no deliberate intervention for smoking cessation). The estimated rate of stopping smoking without intervention, over an average 10-month period, was 7.33 per cent. This rate is consistent with others reported in the literature when motivation to quit is taken into account. The estimate provides a baseline to judge the effects of smoking-cessation interventions.

[1]  J. Kirscht,et al.  Cigarette smoking and changes in smoking among a cohort of Michigan adults, 1980-82. , 1987, American journal of public health.

[2]  L. Solberg,et al.  A randomized trial to increase smoking intervention by physicians. Doctors Helping Smokers, Round I. , 1989, JAMA.

[3]  N. Owen,et al.  Trial of an intervention to reduce passive smoking in infancy , 1987, Pediatric pulmonology.

[4]  M. Becker,et al.  Evaluation of a minimal-contact smoking cessation intervention in an outpatient setting. , 1987, American journal of public health.

[5]  M. Russell,et al.  Effect of general practitioners' advice against smoking , 1979, British medical journal.

[6]  W. Hall,et al.  Meta-analytic review of the efficacy of smoking cessation interventions. , 1994, Drug and alcohol review.

[7]  G. Cutter,et al.  The effectiveness of smoking cessation methods for smokers in public health maternity clinics: a randomized trial. , 1985, American journal of public health.

[8]  N. Owen,et al.  Stages of readiness to quit smoking: population prevalence and correlates. , 1992, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[9]  A Whitehead,et al.  A general parametric approach to the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  R. Schlegel,et al.  Smoking cessation in family practice: the effects of advice and nicotine chewing gum prescription. , 1986, Addictive behaviors.

[11]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[12]  M. Russell,et al.  Effect of nicotine chewing gum as an adjunct to general practitioner's advice against smoking. , 1983 .

[13]  M. Wakefield,et al.  “Sick of Smoking”: evaluation of a targeted minimal smoking cessation intervention in general practice , 1990, The Medical journal of Australia.

[14]  K. Cummings,et al.  Debunking myths about self-quitting. Evidence from 10 prospective studies of persons who attempt to quit smoking by themselves. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[15]  W. Rosser,et al.  The impact of routine advice on smoking cessation from family physicians. , 1982, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[16]  N. Wald,et al.  Controlled trial of three different antismoking interventions in general practice. , 1984, British medical journal.

[17]  R. Richmond,et al.  Three year evaluation of a programme by general practitioners to help patients to stop smoking. , 1986, British medical journal.

[18]  A. Folsom,et al.  Stop smoking advice by physicians: a feasible approach? , 1987, American journal of public health.