Do Ravens Show Consolation? Responses to Distressed Others

Background Bystander affiliation (post-conflict affiliation from an uninvolved bystander to the conflict victim) may represent an expression of empathy in which the bystander consoles the victim to alleviate the victim's distress (“consolation”). However, alternative hypotheses for the function of bystander affiliation also exist. Determining whether ravens spontaneously offer consolation to distressed partners may not only help us to understand how animals deal with the costs of aggressive conflict, but may also play an important role in the empathy debate. Methodology/Principal findings This study investigates the post-conflict behavior of ravens, applying the predictive framework for the function of bystander affiliation for the first time in a non-ape species. We found weak evidence for reconciliation (post-conflict affiliation between former opponents), but strong evidence for both bystander affiliation and solicited bystander affiliation (post-conflict affiliation from the victim to a bystander). Bystanders involved in both interactions were likely to share a valuable relationship with the victim. Bystander affiliation offered to the victim was more likely to occur after intense conflicts. Renewed aggression was less likely to occur after the victim solicited affiliation from a bystander. Conclusions/Significance Our findings suggest that in ravens, bystanders may console victims with whom they share a valuable relationship, thus alleviating the victims' post-conflict distress. Conversely victims may affiliate with bystanders after a conflict in order to reduce the likelihood of renewed aggression. These results stress the importance of relationship quality in determining the occurrence and function of post-conflict interactions, and show that ravens may be sensitive to the emotions of others.

[1]  J. Call,et al.  Postconflict third-party affiliation in stumptailed macaques , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Filippo Aureli,et al.  Consolation, reconciliation, and a possible cognitive difference between macaques and chimpanzees , 1996 .

[3]  Nicola S. Clayton,et al.  The Mentality of Crows: Convergent Evolution of Intelligence in Corvids and Apes , 2004, Science.

[4]  B. Heinrich,et al.  Foraging by common ravens in the presence and absence of territory holders: an experimental analysis of social foraging , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Nicola S. Clayton,et al.  Intelligence in Corvids and Apes: A Case of Convergent Evolution? , 2009 .

[6]  F. D. de Waal,et al.  The monkey in the mirror: hardly a stranger. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  T. Singer The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[8]  Amanda M Seed,et al.  Cognitive adaptations of social bonding in birds , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  D. Povinelli,et al.  Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members , 2005, Nature.

[10]  G. Bower,et al.  The evolution of a cognitive psychologist: a journey from simple behaviors to complex mental acts. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  P. Judge Dyadic and triadic reconciliation in pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina) , 1991, American journal of primatology.

[12]  Derek C. Penn,et al.  On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a ‘theory of mind’ , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  S. E. Koski,et al.  Empathic chimpanzees: A proposal of the levels of emotional and cognitive processing in chimpanzee empathy , 2010 .

[14]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Spontaneous Altruism by Chimpanzees and Young Children , 2007, PLoS biology.

[15]  Filippo Aureli,et al.  Conflict resolution following aggression in gregarious animals: a predictive framework , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  R. Wittig,et al.  Kin-mediated reconciliation substitutes for direct reconciliation in female baboons , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  L. Rosati,et al.  Behavioral and emotional response of Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata) mothers after their offspring receive an aggression. , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[18]  B. Heinrich,et al.  Dispersal and association among common ravens , 1994 .

[19]  Common Raven (Corvus corax) , 1999 .

[20]  E. Palagi,et al.  Postconflict third-party affiliation in Canis lupus: do wolves share similarities with the great apes? , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  B. Heinrich,et al.  Pilfering ravens, Corvus corax, adjust their behaviour to social context and identity of competitors , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[22]  F. D. de Waal,et al.  Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) consolation: third-party identity as a window on possible function. , 2010, Journal of comparative psychology.

[23]  S. Preston,et al.  Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[24]  P. K. McGregor,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Behaviours specific to communication networks , 2005 .

[25]  Daniel Stahl,et al.  Stress reduction through consolation in chimpanzees , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  F. Waal,et al.  Reconciliation and Redirected Affection in Rhesus Monkeys , 1983 .

[27]  C. Boesch,et al.  “Decision-making” in conflicts of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): an extension of the Relational Model , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  B. Heinrich,et al.  Ravens Judge Competitors through Experience with Play Caching , 2007, Current Biology.

[29]  R. L. Knight,et al.  The common raven , 1980 .

[30]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Rich Pickings Near Large Communal Roosts Favor ‘Gang’ Foraging by Juvenile Common Ravens, Corvus corax , 2009, PloS one.

[31]  Daniel J. Levitin,et al.  Social Modulation of Pain as Evidence for Empathy in Mice , 2006, Science.

[32]  K. Kotrschal,et al.  Heart rate modulation in bystanding geese watching social and non-social events , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  T. Bugnyar,et al.  The quality of social relationships in ravens , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  de Waal,et al.  Primates--a natural heritage of conflict resolution. , 2000 .

[35]  Filippo Aureli,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Redirection of aggression: multiparty signalling within a network? , 2005 .

[36]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Redirected aggression and reconciliation among vervet monkeys, Cercopithecus aethiops , 1989 .

[37]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  The role of empathy in the formation and maintenance of social bonds , 2001 .

[38]  F. D. de Waal Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[39]  Tetsuro Matsuzawa,et al.  The Mind of the Chimpanzee: Ecological and Experimental Perspectives , 2010 .

[40]  F. Waal,et al.  Reconciliation and consolation among chimpanzees , 1979, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[41]  B. Heinrich,et al.  Just how smart are ravens? , 2007, Scientific American.

[42]  E. Sterck,et al.  Triadic postconflict affiliation in captive chimpanzees: does consolation console? , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Mirror-Induced Behavior in the Magpie (Pica pica): Evidence of Self-Recognition , 2008, PLoS biology.

[44]  Filippo Aureli,et al.  Post-conflict Behaviour in Long-tailed Macaques (Macaca fascicularis): II. Coping with the Uncertainty , 2010 .

[45]  Reaching into thought: The minds of great apes , 1998 .

[46]  C. Boesch,et al.  The Choice of Post-conflict Interactions in Wild Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) , 2003 .

[47]  Kai Curry-Lindahi,et al.  Handbuch der Vogel Mitteleuropas , 1970 .

[48]  N. Emery,et al.  Postconflict Third-Party Affiliation in Rooks, Corvus frugilegus , 2007, Current Biology.

[49]  Mahadev Satyanarayanan,et al.  Coping with uncertainty , 2003, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[50]  F. Aureli,et al.  Reconciliation, consolation and postconflict behavioral specificity in chimpanzees , 2008, American journal of primatology.

[51]  Filippo Aureli,et al.  Post-conflict Behaviour in Long-tailed Macaques (Macaca fascicularis): I. The Social Events , 2010 .

[52]  Andrew Whiten,et al.  Post-conflict behaviour of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Budongo forest, Uganda , 2001 .

[53]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Reconciliatory grunts by dominant female baboons influence victims' behaviour , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  M. Nelissen,et al.  Canine Reconciliation and Third‐Party‐Initiated Postconflict Affiliation: Do Peacemaking Social Mechanisms in Dogs Rival Those of Higher Primates? , 2008 .

[55]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Multimodel Inference , 2004 .

[56]  E. Sterck,et al.  Post‐conflict third‐party affiliation in chimpanzees: what's in it for the third party? , 2009, American journal of primatology.

[57]  D. L. Castles,et al.  Reconciliation and post-conflict third-party affiliation among wild chimpanzees in the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania , 2004, Primates.

[58]  Filippo Aureli,et al.  Natural conflict resolution , 2000 .

[59]  P. Judge,et al.  Quadratic postconflict affiliation among bystanders in a hamadryas baboon group , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  Diana Reiss,et al.  Self-recognition in an Asian elephant , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  R. Wittig,et al.  Why are bystanders friendly to recipients of aggression? , 2009, Communicative & integrative biology.