Predicting the Future Position of a Moving Target

Three experiments were conducted to examine the processes underlying the prediction of the future position of a moving target. A target moved horizontally across a computer screen at constant velocity, disappearing partway across the screen, and subjects responded when they estimated the target would have passed a point on the far side of the screen, had it continued on its path. The first experiment demonstrated that visual tracking of the target is not necessary for successful position estimation. In the second experiment, the time over which the prediction was made rather than the interval for which the target was visible, the distance over which the prediction was made, or the velocity of the target, was found to affect performance. Finally, performance was not affected when markers were placed parallel to the trajectory of the target; the presence of gratings which masked portions of the target's path did not affect subjects' performance. The previous literature suggests that the spatial interval over which predictions are made is the important variable; we find that temporal factors are the major determinants of prediction.

[1]  S. Anstis The perception of apparent movement. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[2]  Norman W. Heimstra,et al.  Velocity-Time Estimation as a Function of Target Speed and Concealment Extent , 1969 .

[3]  Le rôle de la vitesse dans l'anticipation d'un mouvement visuel , 1970 .

[4]  S. McKee,et al.  Precise velocity discrimination despite random variations in temporal frequency and contrast , 1986, Vision Research.

[5]  P. Walker,et al.  Lateral interaction between neural channels sensitive to velocity in the human visual system , 1974, Nature.

[6]  J S Lappin,et al.  On the relation between time and space in the visual discrimination of velocity. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  E. Wiener Motion prediction as a function of target speed and duration of presentation. , 1962 .

[9]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  Vernon S. Ellingstad VELOCITY ESTIMATION FOR BRIEFLY DISPLAYED TARGETS , 1967 .

[11]  A. T. Slater-Hammel,et al.  Estimation of Movement as a Function of the Distance of Movement Perception and Target Distance , 1955 .

[12]  C. Bonnet TWO SYSTEMS IN THE DETECTION OF VISUAL MOTION * , 1984, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  D. Rosenbaum Perception and extrapolation of velocity and acceleration. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  S. McKee A local mechanism for differential velocity detection , 1981, Vision Research.

[15]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Model of human visual-motion sensing. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  G G Haydu,et al.  Perception of Apparent Motion. , 1960, Science.

[17]  O. Braddick A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[18]  D. Algom,et al.  Visual velocity input-output functions: the integration of distance and duration onto subjective velocity. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  H T Whiting,et al.  Prediction of Linear Motion , 1974, Human factors.

[20]  D. J. Gerhard,et al.  THE JUDGMENT OF VELOCITY AND PREDICTION OF MOTION , 1959 .

[21]  C Bonnet,et al.  Discrimination of Velocities and Mechanisms of Motion Perception , 1984, Perception.