The Psychiatrist and Peer Review: A Psychodynamic Perspective

Consideration of peer review is timely, given that formalisation of peer review processes is one of the responses the psychiatric profession could make to increasing calls for accountability from within and without the profession. The establishment of formal peer review evoked strong, often hostile, responses among psychiatrists in the United States, reflecting considerable underlying anxiety. This paper examines the responses to formal peer review in psychiatrists from a psychodynamic perspective.

[1]  G. Gabbard,et al.  A psychodynamic perspective on the clinical impact of insurance review. , 1991, The American journal of psychiatry.

[2]  S. Green The process of reviewing peers. , 1989, General hospital psychiatry.

[3]  N. el-Guebaly Peer Review: Empirical Data Base and Practical Implications , 1988, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[4]  R. H. Wright,et al.  Problems, protests, and proposals. , 1987 .

[5]  H. Rudominer Peer Review, Third-Party Payment, and The Analytic Situation: A Case Report , 1984, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[6]  S. Pulver,et al.  Survey of Psychoanalytic Practice 1976; Some Trends and Implications , 1978, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[7]  N. De,et al.  Effects of peer review on outpatient psychotherapy: therapist and patient follow-up survey. , 1976 .