Using toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic modeling as an acute risk assessment refinement approach in vertebrate ecological risk assessment.

Recent guidance identified toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic (TK-TD) modeling as a relevant approach for risk assessment refinement. Yet, its added value compared to other refinement options is not detailed, and how to conduct the modeling appropriately is not explained. This case study addresses these issues through 2 examples of individual-level risk assessment for 2 hypothetical plant protection products: 1) evaluating the risk for small granivorous birds and small omnivorous mammals of a single application, as a seed treatment in winter cereals, and 2) evaluating the risk for fish after a pulsed treatment in the edge-of-field zone. Using acute test data, we conducted the first tier risk assessment as defined in the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) guidance. When first tier risk assessment highlighted a concern, refinement options were discussed. Cases where the use of models should be preferred over other existing refinement approaches were highlighted. We then practically conducted the risk assessment refinement by using 2 different models as examples. In example 1, a TK model accounting for toxicokinetics and relevant feeding patterns in the skylark and in the wood mouse was used to predict internal doses of the hypothetical active ingredient in individuals, based on relevant feeding patterns in an in-crop situation, and identify the residue levels leading to mortality. In example 2, a TK-TD model accounting for toxicokinetics, toxicodynamics, and relevant exposure patterns in the fathead minnow was used to predict the time-course of fish survival for relevant FOCUS SW exposure scenarios and identify which scenarios might lead to mortality. Models were calibrated using available standard data and implemented to simulate the time-course of internal dose of active ingredient or survival for different exposure scenarios. Simulation results were discussed and used to derive the risk assessment refinement endpoints used for decision. Finally, we compared the "classical" risk assessment approach with the model-based approach. These comparisons showed that TK and TK-TD models can bring more realism to the risk assessment through the possibility to study realistic exposure scenarios and to simulate relevant mechanisms of effects (including delayed toxicity and recovery). Noticeably, using TK-TD models is currently the most relevant way to directly connect realistic exposure patterns to effects. We conclude with recommendations on how to properly use TK and TK-TD model in acute risk assessment for vertebrates.

[1]  Ettore Capri,et al.  Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters , 2013 .

[2]  Walter Schmitt,et al.  Toxicokinetic‐toxicodynamic modeling of quantal and graded sublethal endpoints: A brief discussion of concepts , 2011, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[3]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  General unified threshold model of survival--a toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic framework for ecotoxicology. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  T. Brock Linking Aquatic Exposure and Effects: Risk Assessment of Pesticides , 2009 .

[5]  A. Hunka,et al.  Stakeholders’ Perspective on Ecological Modeling in Environmental Risk Assessment of Pesticides: Challenges and Opportunities , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Thomas G Preuss,et al.  A review of the tissue residue approach for organic and organometallic compounds in aquatic organisms , 2011, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[7]  Pernille Thorbek,et al.  A toxicokinetic model for thiamethoxam in rats: implications for higher-tier risk assessment , 2013, Ecotoxicology.

[8]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Toxicodynamic assumptions in ecotoxicological hazard models , 2007 .

[9]  Tjalling Jager,et al.  A biology-based approach for quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) in ecotoxicity , 2009, Ecotoxicology.

[10]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  A METHOD TO PREDICT AND UNDERSTAND FISH SURVIVAL UNDER DYNAMIC CHEMICAL STRESS USING STANDARD ECOTOXICITY DATA , 2013, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[11]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic modelling of survival of Gammarus pulex in multiple pulse exposures to propiconazole: model assumptions, calibration data requirements and predictive power , 2012, Ecotoxicology.

[12]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic modeling explains carry-over toxicity from exposure to diazinon by slow organism recovery. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Advantages of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic modelling in aquatic ecotoxicology and risk assessment. , 2010, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[14]  Roman Ashauer,et al.  Highly time‐variable exposure to chemicals—toward an assessment strategy , 2013, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[15]  Johan Gabrielsson,et al.  Comprar Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data Analysis: Concepts and Applications, Fourth Edition | Johan Gabrielsson | 9789197651004 | Informa Healthcare , 2007 .

[16]  Hugh A Barton,et al.  The Acquisition and Application of Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion (ADME) Data in Agricultural Chemical Safety Assessments , 2006, Critical reviews in toxicology.