Complex population dynamics and complex causation: devils, details and demography

Population dynamics result from the interplay of density-independent and density-dependent processes. Understanding this interplay is important, especially for being able to predict near-term population trajectories for management. In recent years, the study of model systems—experimental, observational and theoretical—has shed considerable light on the way that the both density-dependent and -independent aspects of the environment affect population dynamics via impacting on the organism's life history and therefore demography. These model-based approaches suggest that (i) individuals in different states differ in their demographic performance, (ii) these differences generate structure that can fluctuate independently of current total population size and so can influence the dynamics in important ways, (iii) individuals are strongly affected by both current and past environments, even when the past environments may be in previous generations and (iv) dynamics are typically complex and transient due to environmental noise perturbing complex population structures. For understanding population dynamics of any given system, we suggest that ‘the devil is in the detail’. Experimental dissection of empirical systems is providing important insights into the details of the drivers of demographic responses and therefore dynamics and should also stimulate theory that incorporates relevant biological mechanism.

[1]  T. Benton,et al.  Talkin’ 'bout My Generation: Environmental Variability and Cohort Effects , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[2]  I. Gordon,et al.  Delayed costs of growth and compensatory growth rates , 2004 .

[3]  C. Thomas,et al.  Changes in Dispersal during Species’ Range Expansions , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[4]  J. Elkinton,et al.  MATERNAL EFFECTS IN GYPSY MOTH: ONLY SEX RATIO VARIES WITH POPULATION DENSITY , 1998 .

[5]  J. Clobert,et al.  Maternal size and stress and offspring philopatry: An experimental study in the common lizard (Lacerta vivipara)1 , 2004 .

[6]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Model complexity and population predictions. The alpine marmot as a case study , 2002 .

[7]  A. Grant,et al.  Visibility of the impact of environmental noise: a response to Kaitala and Ranta , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[9]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Decomposing the variation in population growth into contributions from multiple demographic rates , 2005 .

[10]  R. Wootton,et al.  Compensatory growth in fishes: a response to growth depression , 2003 .

[11]  C. Fox,et al.  Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. , 2000, Annual review of entomology.

[12]  T. Benton,et al.  Changes in maternal investment in eggs can affect population dynamics , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Maturation trends indicative of rapid evolution preceded the collapse of northern cod , 2004, Nature.

[14]  A. Joshi,et al.  The evolution of population stability as a by-product of life-history evolution , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  S. Munch,et al.  Darwinian fishery science: lessons from the Atlantic silverside (Menidia menidia) , 2005 .

[16]  J. Laakso,et al.  Non-linear biological responses to disturbance: consequences on population dynamics , 2003 .

[17]  P. Banks,et al.  Does maternal condition or predation risk influence small mammal population dynamics , 2004 .

[18]  E. Bignal,et al.  Environmental variability, life-history covariation and cohort effects in the red-billed chough Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax , 2003 .

[19]  S. Ellner,et al.  STATE‐DEPENDENT ENERGY ALLOCATION IN VARIABLE ENVIRONMENTS: LIFE HISTORY EVOLUTION OF A ROTIFER , 2002 .

[20]  Pejman Rohani,et al.  Seasonnally forced disease dynamics explored as switching between attractors , 2001 .

[21]  C. Fox,et al.  Maternal effects as adaptations , 1998 .

[22]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Behavioural models of population growth rates: implications for conservation and prediction. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  T. Lovejoy Climate change and biodiversity. , 2008, Revue scientifique et technique.

[24]  T. Royama,et al.  MORAN EFFECT ON NONLINEAR POPULATION PROCESSES , 2005 .

[25]  T. Benton,et al.  The Amplification of Environmental Noise in Population Models: Causes and Consequences , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[26]  T. Benton,et al.  Population Dynamics in a Noisy World: Lessons From a Mite Experimental System , 2005 .

[27]  T. Benton,et al.  Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[28]  H. Caswell Analysis of life table response experiments I. Decomposition of effects on population growth rate , 1989 .

[29]  T. H. Clutton-Brock,et al.  Why large-scale climate indices seem to predict ecological processes better than local weather , 2004, Nature.

[30]  E. Crone Parental Environmental Effects and Cyclical Dynamics in Plant Populations , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[31]  Jim M Cushing,et al.  Chaos in Ecology: Experimental Nonlinear Dynamics , 2002 .

[32]  T. Bridges,et al.  Fitness Consequences of Maternal Effects in Streblospio benedicti (Annelida: Polychaeta) , 1996 .

[33]  T. Benton,et al.  Stage‐structured harvesting and its effects: an empirical investigation using soil mites , 2004 .

[34]  E. Mccauley,et al.  Maternal effects in Daphnia: what mothers are telling their offspring and do they listen? , 2001 .

[35]  Valery E. Forbes,et al.  Using elasticity analysis of demographic models to link toxicant effects on individuals to the population level : an example , 1999 .

[36]  Cheryl J. Briggs,et al.  What causes generation cycles in populations of stored-product moths? , 2000 .

[37]  J. Eriksson,et al.  Extreme hypertrophic cardiomyopathy , 2003, Heart.

[38]  P. Rohani,et al.  Stage-structured competition and the cyclic dynamics of host-parasitoid populations , 2004 .

[39]  J. Gurevitch,et al.  Population Numbers Count: Tools for Near‐Term Demographic Analysis , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[40]  J. V. Greenman,et al.  Large amplification in stage-structured models: Arnol’d tongues revisited , 2004, Journal of mathematical biology.

[41]  M. Oli,et al.  The Demographic Basis of Population Regulation in Columbian Ground Squirrels , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[42]  N. Yoccoz,et al.  SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE INTERPLAY OF COHORT AND MOTHER QUALITY ON BODY MASS OF RED DEER CALVES , 2004 .

[43]  C. Fox,et al.  Maternal age affects offspring lifespan of the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus , 2003 .

[44]  M. Keeling,et al.  The Interplay between Determinism and Stochasticity in Childhood Diseases , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[45]  B T Grenfell,et al.  Age, sex, density, winter weather, and population crashes in Soay sheep. , 2001, Science.

[46]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Contrasting alternative hypotheses about rodent cycles by translating them into parameterized models , 2001 .

[47]  Brian Dennis,et al.  Explaining and predicting patterns in stochastic population systems , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  J. V. Greenman,et al.  The frequency spectrum of structured discrete time population models: its properties and their ecological implications , 2005 .

[49]  L. Rowe,et al.  Resource limitation, predation risk and compensatory growth in a damselfly , 2004, Oecologia.

[50]  R. Costantino,et al.  Anatomy of a chaotic attractor: Subtle model-predicted patterns revealed in population data , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Jim M Cushing,et al.  Nonlinear Stochastic Population Dynamics: The Flour Beetle Tribolium as an Effective Tool of Discovery , 2005 .

[52]  W. Lampert,et al.  Maternal Effects of Photoperiod and Food Level on Life History Characteristics of the Cladoceran Daphnia Pulicaria Forbes , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[53]  M. Holyoak,et al.  The Contribution of Laboratory Experiments on Protists to Understanding Population and Metapopulation Dynamics , 2005 .

[54]  D. M. S. Matos,et al.  Mathematical constraints on transition matrix elasticity analysis , 1998 .

[55]  J. Potti MATERNAL EFFECTS AND THE PERVASIVE IMPACT OF NESTLING HISTORY ON EGG SIZE IN A PASSERINE BIRD , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[56]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Comparing plant life histories using elasticity analysis: the importance of life span and the number of life-cycle stages , 1995, Oecologia.

[57]  M. Rose,et al.  Population Dynamics, Life History, and Demography: Lessons From Drosophila , 2005 .

[58]  Richard Law,et al.  Fishing, selection, and phenotypic evolution , 2000 .

[59]  J. Lindström,et al.  Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[60]  Peter Gluckman,et al.  Developmental plasticity and human health , 2004, Nature.

[61]  Marco Festa-Bianchet,et al.  Using reproductive value to estimate key parameters in density-independent age-structured populations. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[62]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Cycles and trends in cod populations. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  S. Côté,et al.  Maternal effects on post-weaning physical and social development in juvenile mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[64]  Denis Réale,et al.  Genetic and plastic responses of a northern mammal to climate change , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[65]  R. Knell Generation cycles. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[66]  T. Benton,et al.  Context‐Dependent Intergenerational Effects: The Interaction between Past and Present Environments and Its Effect on Population Dynamics , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[67]  F. Bozinovic,et al.  Dietary effects on life history traits in a terrestrial isopod: the importance of evaluating maternal effects and trade-offs , 2004, Oecologia.

[68]  J V Greenman,et al.  The impact of environmental fluctuations on structured discrete time population models: resonance, synchrony and threshold behaviour. , 2005, Theoretical population biology.

[69]  S. Scheiner,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF DAPHNIA PULEX IN A TEMPORALLY VARYING ENVIRONMENT , 1998 .

[70]  Jim M Cushing,et al.  Basins of attraction: population dynamics with two stable 4‐cycles , 2002 .

[71]  Nicholas A. Friedenberg Experimental evolution of dispersal in spatiotemporally variable microcosms , 2003 .

[72]  S. Ellner,et al.  SIZE‐SPECIFIC SENSITIVITY: APPLYING A NEW STRUCTURED POPULATION MODEL , 2000 .

[73]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  From interesting details to dynamical relevance: toward more effective use of empirical insights in theory construction , 2001 .

[74]  F. Messina,et al.  Environment‐dependent reversal of a life history trade‐off in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[75]  M. Shimada,et al.  Complexity, Evolution, and Persistence in Host-Parasitoid Experimental Systems With Callosobruchus Beetles as the Host , 2005 .

[76]  S. Ellner,et al.  Integral Projection Models for Species with Complex Demography , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[77]  L. Rowe,et al.  Natural Selection in a Bottle , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[78]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Evolutionarily enlightened management , 2003 .

[79]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Mechanisms for delayed density-dependent reproductive traits in field voles, Microtus agrestis: the importance of inherited environmental effects , 2001 .

[80]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  POPULATION CYCLES IN THE PINE LOOPER MOTH: DYNAMICAL TESTS OF MECHANISTIC HYPOTHESES , 2005 .

[81]  C. Fox,et al.  Egg Size Plasticity in a Seed Beetle: An Adaptive Maternal Effect , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[82]  Brian Dennis,et al.  Multiple attractors, saddles, and population dynamics in periodic habitats , 1999, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[83]  Veijo Kaitala,et al.  Population dynamic consequences of delayed life-history effects , 2002 .

[84]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[85]  H. Kokko,et al.  Cohort effects and population dynamics , 2002 .

[86]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Life-history traits of voles in a fluctuating population respond to the immediate environment , 2001, Nature.

[87]  Andrew P. Hendry,et al.  Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology , 2003 .

[88]  M. Palmer,et al.  Quantitative Bioscience for the 21st Century , 2005 .

[89]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  5. Renewing the Dialogue between Theory and Experiments in Population Ecology , 1989 .

[90]  N. Metcalfe,et al.  Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[91]  L. Kruuk,et al.  ESTIMATING SELECTION ON NEONATAL TRAITS IN RED DEER USING ELASTICITY PATH ANALYSIS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[92]  N. Stenseth,et al.  DENSITY-DEPENDENT COMPENSATION IN BLOWFLY POPULATIONS GIVE INDIRECTLY POSITIVE EFFECTS OF A TOXICANT , 2002 .

[93]  E. Ranta,et al.  Visibility of demography-modulating noise in population dynamics , 2002 .

[94]  Jim M Cushing,et al.  Chaos in Ecology , 2005 .

[95]  A. R. Dyer Maternal and sibling factors induce dormancy in dimorphic seed pairs of Aegilops triuncialis , 2004, Plant Ecology.

[96]  S. Juliano,et al.  POPULATION DYNAMICS , 2007, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[97]  Charles W Fox,et al.  Rapid Evolution of Egg Size in Captive Salmon , 2003, Science.

[98]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Lifespan: Catch-up growth and obesity in male mice , 2004, Nature.

[99]  R. Baggott DISEASE , 1947, Social Policy & Administration.

[100]  J. Travis Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[101]  C. Fox,et al.  COMPLEX PATTERNS OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY: INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE DURING REARING AND OVIPOSITION , 2005 .

[102]  Odo Diekmann,et al.  On the formulation and analysis of general deterministic structured population models I. Linear Theory , 1998, Journal of mathematical biology.

[103]  D. Fletcher,et al.  Equivalence relationships between stage-structured population models. , 2002, Mathematical biosciences.

[104]  D. Melé 21 ST -CENTURY , 2007 .

[105]  C. Pfister,et al.  INDIVIDUAL VARIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL STOCHASTICITY: IMPLICATIONS FOR MATRIX MODEL PREDICTIONS , 2003 .

[106]  L. Kruuk,et al.  Early determinants of lifetime reproductive success differ between the sexes in red deer , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[107]  S. Ellner,et al.  Ecological and Evolutionary Dynamics of Experimental Plankton Communities , 2005 .

[108]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Comparative ungulate dynamics: the devil is in the detail. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[109]  K. Cuddington,et al.  Unstructured population models: do population-level assumptions yield general theory? , 2005 .

[110]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Lasting effects of conditions at birth on moose body mass , 2004 .

[111]  Tim G. Benton,et al.  Population responses to perturbations: Predictions and responses from laboratory mite populations , 2004 .

[112]  O. Diekmann,et al.  On the formulation and analysis of general deterministic structured population models II. Nonlinear theory , 2000 .