How data brokers endanger privacy

In the last decades, the information trading industry experienced important growth with the advent of Big Data. Information traders such as data brokers keep more and more detailed profiles of individuals, thus storing a variety of sensitive information. Those practices raise public concern, as leakage of personal data can harm data subjects and put the individual at risk of frauds or identity thefts. Even more worrisome is the fact that some data brokers, namely person search sites, deliver important amounts of personal data for free, by providing person registries on their public website. While a single data broker doing so may cause limited harm, when multiple person search sites provide different kinds of easily accessible personal information, those data can be linked to produce a complete profile containing a wide range of sensitive information. To provide the readers with an understanding of the current data broker industry, we conducted a survey on 75 data brokers and present the results in this paper. Furthermore, to show how easy it is to link data across different data brokers, we developed a system that automatically collects and links profiles from different person search sites. This system, named DROPLET, requires limited human intervention, but can produce linked profiles containing large amounts of personal sensitive information.

[1]  Jeeyun Baik,et al.  Data Privacy Against Innovation or Against Discrimination?: The Case of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) , 2020, Telematics Informatics.

[2]  Jennifer Brite,et al.  An Introduction to Probabilistic Record Linkage with a Focus on Linkage Processing for WTC Registries , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[3]  Jorge Marx Gómez,et al.  A Qualitative Literature Review on Linkage Techniques for Data Integration , 2020, HICSS.

[4]  Sarah Myers West,et al.  Data Capitalism: Redefining the Logics of Surveillance and Privacy , 2019 .

[5]  Kassem Fawaz,et al.  The Privacy Policy Landscape After the GDPR , 2018, Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol..

[6]  Thomas B. Norton,et al.  Transparency and the Marketplace for Student Data , 2018 .

[7]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Privacy Risks with Facebook's PII-Based Targeting: Auditing a Data Broker's Advertising Interface , 2018, 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP).

[8]  Matthew Crain,et al.  The limits of transparency: Data brokers and commodification , 2018, New Media Soc..

[9]  Chih-Liang Yeh Pursuing consumer empowerment in the age of big data: A comprehensive regulatory framework for data brokers , 2017 .

[10]  Reza Zafarani,et al.  User Identity Linkage across Online Social Networks: A Review , 2017, SKDD.

[11]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Reconstructing Profiles from Information Disseminated on the Internet , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing.

[12]  Benjamin W. Cramer Nothing to Hide: The False Tradeoff between Privacy and Security , 2012, Journal of Information Policy.

[13]  Peter Christen,et al.  A Two-Step Classification Approach to Unsupervised Record Linkage , 2007, AusDM.

[14]  Max N. Helveston Reining in Commercial Exploitation of Consumer Data , 2019 .

[15]  D. Green Big Brother is Listening to You: Digital Eavesdropping in the Advertising Industry , 2018 .

[16]  Michelle Geronimo Online Browsing: Can, Should, and May Companies Combine Online and Offline Data to Learn About You? , 2017 .

[17]  Theodore Rostow What Happens When an Acquaintance Buys Your Data?: A New Privacy Harm in the Age of Data Brokers , 2017 .

[18]  Ashley Kuempel,et al.  The Invisible Middleman: A Critique and Call for Reform of the Data Broker Industry , 2016 .

[19]  R. Cialdini Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion , 1993 .