A new decision rule for sparse representation based classification for face recognition

Abstract The sparse representation based classification (SRC) method attracts much attention in recent years, due to its promising result and robustness for face recognition. Different from the previous improved versions of SRC which emphasize more on sparsity, we focus on the decision rule of SRC. SRC predicts the label of a given test sample based on the residual which measures the representational capability of the training data of each class. Such decision rule is the same as the nearest feature classifiers (NFCs), but not optimal for SRC which is based on the mechanism of sparsity. In this paper, we first review the NFCs, and rewrite them in a unified formulation. We found that the objective of NFCs is different from SRC but they use the same decision rule. In order to capture more discriminative information from the sparse coding coefficient, we propose a new decision rule, sum of coefficient (SoC), which matches well with SRC. SoC is based on the fact that the sparse coefficient reflects the similarities between data, which are able to take full advantage of sparsity for classification. SoC can be regarded as the voting decision rule which is widely used in ensemble learning, i.e. Adaboost, Bagging. We compare our method with the original SRC on three representative face databases and show that SoC is much more discriminative and accurate.

[1]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[2]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  Face recognition using the nearest feature line method , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[3]  D. Donoho For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal 𝓁1‐norm solution is also the sparsest solution , 2006 .

[4]  Jian Yang,et al.  Robust sparse coding for face recognition , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[5]  Aleix M. Martinez,et al.  The AR face database , 1998 .

[6]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  From Few to Many: Illumination Cone Models for Face Recognition under Variable Lighting and Pose , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  A. Martínez,et al.  The AR face databasae , 1998 .

[9]  Xiaoyang Tan,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 2016, Communications in Computer and Information Science.

[10]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1995, EuroCOLT.

[11]  Canyi Lu,et al.  Optimized Projection for Sparse Representation Based Classification , 2015, ArXiv.

[12]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Online Learning for Matrix Factorization and Sparse Coding , 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  Dmitry M. Malioutov,et al.  Homotopy continuation for sparse signal representation , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[14]  Junfeng Yang,et al.  Alternating Direction Algorithms for 1-Problems in Compressive Sensing , 2009, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[15]  Jen-Tzung Chien,et al.  Discriminant Waveletfaces and Nearest Feature Classifiers for Face Recognition , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Face recognition using eigenfaces , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[18]  Shuicheng Yan,et al.  Learning With $\ell ^{1}$-Graph for Image Analysis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Fast ℓ1-minimization algorithms and an application in robust face recognition: A review , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[20]  René Vidal,et al.  Sparse subspace clustering , 2009, CVPR.

[21]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[22]  Ran He,et al.  Maximum Correntropy Criterion for Robust Face Recognition , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[23]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[24]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[25]  René Vidal,et al.  Robust classification using structured sparse representation , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[26]  Liang-Tien Chia,et al.  Kernel Sparse Representation for Image Classification and Face Recognition , 2010, ECCV.

[27]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[28]  J KriegmanDavid,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces , 1997 .

[29]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Online dictionary learning for sparse coding , 2009, ICML '09.

[30]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Normalized cuts and image segmentation , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.