Continuity and change in interorganizational project practices : the Dutch shipbuilding industry, 1950-2010

The Dutch shipbuilding industry has a longstanding tradition in project-based production. Recently, industry actors have acknowledged a serious misfit between interorganizational project practices, defined as behaviors related to collaboration, and interorganizational project demands, defined as environmental conditions. This misfit leads to a weaker competitive position due to higher communication and production costs, and longer production times. However, the causes of this misfit remain unclear. Among project researchers there is a growing awareness that history has a major influence on contemporary practices in interorganizational projects, suggesting that some of the causes of the present-day misfit may be rooted in the past. This paper studies historical developments of interorganizational project practices in Dutch shipbuilding projects, in order to understand to what extent contemporary misfit in project practices is rooted in the past and results from path dependencies and lock-ins. We answer the following research question: How did interorganizational project practices and demands in the Dutch shipbuilding industry develop between 1950 and 2010 and to what extent do these developments help us understand the current misfit between project practices and demands? Our results show that a web of self-reinforcing mechanisms at least partially explains the current misfit in the Dutch shipbuilding industry. This paper answers to the conceptual call by Sydow et al. (2009) and supplements path dependence literature by showing that self-reinforcing mechanisms causing path dependence can be separated analytically, but are intertwined empirically.

[1]  Jörg Sydow,et al.  Organizational Path Dependence: A Process View , 2011 .

[2]  Chris Huxham,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations , 2010 .

[3]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Environments of Organizations , 1976 .

[4]  Jean-Philippe Vergne,et al.  The Missing Link between the Theory and Empirics of Path Dependence: Conceptual Clarification, Testability Issue, and Methodological Implications , 2010 .

[5]  Nils Stieglitz,et al.  Innovations and the Role of Complementarities in a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 2007 .

[6]  C. Hardy,et al.  Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields , 2002 .

[7]  Howard E. Aldrich Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[8]  Chris Huxham,et al.  Theorizing collaboration practice , 2003 .

[9]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[10]  Henry Mintzberg Patterns in Strategy Formation , 1978, International Studies of Management & Organization.

[11]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1985 .

[12]  L. Donaldson STRATEGY AND STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT TO REGAIN FIT AND PERFORMANCE: IN DEFENCE OF CONTINGENCY THEORY , 1987 .

[13]  Michael Rowlinson,et al.  The Treatment of History in Organisation Studies: Towards an ‘Historic Turn’? , 2004 .

[14]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[15]  T. Kostova,et al.  Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects , 2002 .

[16]  Beth A. Bechky Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[18]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[19]  Pernille Eskerod,et al.  Meaning and action in a multi-project environment. Understanding a multi-project environment by means of metaphors and basic assumptions , 1996 .

[20]  B. Looy,et al.  Toward An Integrative Perspective on Alliance Governance: Connecting Contract Design, Trust Dynamics, and Contract Application , 2008 .

[21]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Business Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools , 1997, MIS Q..

[22]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[23]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[24]  M. Engwall No project is an island: linking projects to history and context , 2003 .

[25]  J. Whitney Case Study Research , 1999 .

[26]  Alfred Kieser,et al.  Introduction: History in Organisation Studies , 2004 .

[27]  Benyamin B. Lichtenstein,et al.  Temporary Inter‐organizational Projects , 2008 .

[28]  P. Klemperer,et al.  Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects , 2006 .

[29]  J. Sydow,et al.  Project Networks and Changing Industry Practices Collaborative Content Production in the German Television Industry , 2001 .

[30]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[31]  John Birkler,et al.  Differences Between Military and Commercial Shipbuilding: Implications for the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defence , 2005 .

[32]  Joyce Fortune,et al.  Current practice in project management — an empirical study , 2002 .

[33]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Managing inter-institutional projects: The significance of isochronism, timing norms and temporal misfits , 2011 .

[34]  Alexander Verbraeck,et al.  Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework , 2011 .

[35]  Jörg Sydow,et al.  Path Dependencies in Project-Based Organizing: Evidence from Television Production in Germany , 2009 .

[36]  R. Goodman,et al.  Some Management Issues in Temporary Systems: A Study of Professional Development and Manpower--The Theater Case. , 1976 .

[37]  A. Langley,et al.  Templates and Turns in Qualitative Studies of Strategy and Management , 2011 .

[38]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[39]  Leon A.G. Oerlemans,et al.  The nature and prevalence of inter-organizational project ventures: Evidence from a large scale field study in the Netherlands 2006–2009 , 2011 .

[40]  Christian Jensen,et al.  Project relationships ¿ A model for analyzing interactional uncertainty , 2006 .

[41]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment , 1993 .

[42]  Tuomas Ahola,et al.  Purchasing strategies and value creation in industrial turnkey projects , 2008 .

[43]  John Birkler,et al.  Differences Between Military and Commercial Shipbuilding , 2005 .

[44]  M. Diane Burton,et al.  Founding the Future: Path Dependence in the Evolution of Top Management Teams from Founding to IPO , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[45]  Will Mitchell,et al.  When the Social Structure Overshadows Competitive Incentives: The Effects of Network Embeddedness on Joint Venture Dissolution , 2011 .

[46]  Tarun Khanna,et al.  Bringing history (back) into international business , 2006 .

[47]  R. Duncan Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[48]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[49]  Angela Clarke,et al.  A practical use of key success factors to improve the effectiveness of project management , 1999 .

[50]  P. Klemperer,et al.  Chapter 31 Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects , 2007 .

[51]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Toward a typological theory of project management , 1996 .

[52]  Paul Hibbert Inter-organizational collaboration , 2010 .

[53]  Christopher G. Gresov Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. , 1989 .

[54]  W. Scott Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests , 2007 .

[55]  A. Kadefors Institutions in building projects: Implications for flexibility and change , 1995 .

[56]  Gabriel Szulanski Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[57]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Change in the Presence of Fit: the Rise, the Fall, and the Renaissance of Liz Claiborne , 2001 .

[58]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box , 2009 .

[59]  John D. Martz,et al.  Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America , 1992 .

[60]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[61]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  How history matters in organisations: The case of path dependence , 2011 .

[62]  B. Nooteboom,et al.  Path dependence of knowledge: implications for the theory of the firm , 1997 .

[63]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[64]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Identity Ambiguity and Change in the Wake of a Corporate Spin-off , 2004 .