Acceptance of new sanitation: The role of end-users' pro-environmental personal norms and risk and benefit perceptions.

Current sanitation systems are inherently limited in their ability to address the new challenges for (waste)water management that arise from the rising demand to restore resource cycles. These challenges include removal of micropollutants, water (re)use, and nutrient recovery. New opportunities to address these challenges arise from new sanitation, a system innovation that combines elements of source separation, local treatment and reuse, and less use of water. New sanitation is applied, but not yet widespread, in several residential areas in Europe. Implementation is hindered by the lack of insight into the general public's willingness to engage in new sanitation, and the resulting uncertainty about this among decision makers and other stakeholders in wastewater management. Using value-belief-norm theory as a conceptual lens, this paper addresses the individual motivations (pro-environmental personal norms) and personal drivers (benefits) and barriers (risks) for acceptance of new sanitation by the Dutch general public. The results of an online survey (N = 338) indicated that both pro-environmental personal norms and risk and benefit perceptions predict consumers' willingness to accept new sanitation. More specifically, they showed that consumer acceptance is driven by perceived risks relating to the housing market and the need to change behavior, but also by environmental benefits. Overall, new sanitation was favorably evaluated by respondents: 64% indicated that they would likely use new sanitation if they were owner-occupiers. The results of this explorative study are discussed in light of the development of novel sanitation systems that are sensitive to perceptions of end-users and other key stakeholders.

[1]  Nicholas J. Ashbolt,et al.  Cost, energy, global warming, eutrophication and local human health impacts of community water and sanitation service options. , 2017, Water research.

[2]  Treavor H. Boyer,et al.  Student support and perceptions of urine source separation in a university community. , 2016, Water research.

[3]  S. Schwartz Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[4]  H Temmink,et al.  Energy and phosphorus recovery from black water. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  L. Steg,et al.  Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior , 2008 .

[6]  R. Dunlap,et al.  THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1978 .

[7]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[8]  B. Truffer,et al.  Emerging solutions to the water challenges of an urbanizing world , 2016, Science.

[9]  P. M. Poortvliet,et al.  An extended theory of planned behavior to predict consumers' willingness to buy mobile slaughter unit meat. , 2017, Meat science.

[10]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items? Study I: Reliability and Validity , 1971 .

[11]  Judit Lienert,et al.  Considering user attitude in early Development of environmentally friendly technology: a case study of NoMix toilets. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  W. Abrahamse,et al.  Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory , 2005 .

[13]  A. Nordlund,et al.  Exploring consumer adoption of a high involvement eco-innovation using value-belief-norm theory , 2011 .

[14]  Hans J.P. Marvin,et al.  Determinants of stakeholders’ attitudes towards a new technology: nanotechnology applications for food, water, energy and medicine , 2017 .

[15]  L. J. Becker Joint effect of feedback and goal setting on performance: a field study of residential energy conservation , 1978 .

[16]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Beyond acceptable risk: On the social acceptability of technologies , 1982 .

[17]  C. Buisman,et al.  Nutrient removal and microalgal biomass production on urine in a short light-path photobioreactor. , 2014, Water research.

[18]  J. Garvill,et al.  Value Structures behind Proenvironmental Behavior , 2002 .

[19]  Miriam. Ricci,et al.  Risk Perception of an Emergent Technology: The Case of Hydrogen Energy , 2006 .

[20]  G. Zeeman,et al.  Micropollutant removal in an algal treatment system fed with source separated wastewater streams. , 2016, Journal of hazardous materials.

[21]  C. Daughton Ground Water Recharge and Chemical Contaminants: Challenges in Communicating the Connections and Collisions of Two Disparate Worlds , 2004 .

[22]  Judit Lienert,et al.  High acceptance of urine source separation in seven European countries: a review. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[24]  Ingrid Ott,et al.  Academic discipline and risk perception of technologies: An empirical study , 2011 .

[25]  S. Cottrell Influence of Sociodemographics and Environmental Attitudes on General Responsible Environmental Behavior among Recreational Boaters , 2003 .

[26]  L. Steg,et al.  Value Orientations and Environmental Beliefs in Five Countries , 2007 .

[27]  P. Stern New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[28]  Torbjørn Rundmo,et al.  The value-belief-norm theory, personal norms and sustainable travel mode choice in urban areas , 2015 .

[29]  Linda Steg,et al.  Sustainable transportation in Argentina: Values, beliefs, norms and car use reduction , 2013 .

[30]  F. Kaiser,et al.  Contrasting the Theory of Planned Behavior With the Value‐Belief‐Norm Model in Explaining Conservation Behavior1 , 2005 .

[31]  Troy D. Abel,et al.  A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism , 1999 .

[32]  H Temmink,et al.  Long term partial nitritation of anaerobically treated black water and the emission of nitrous oxide. , 2010, Water research.

[33]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  A. Hurlimann Is recycled water use risky? An Urban Australian community’s perspective , 2007 .

[35]  Lynn J. Frewer,et al.  Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: A review , 2012, Public understanding of science.

[36]  J. Schröder,et al.  Towards global phosphorus security: a systems framework for phosphorus recovery and reuse options. , 2011, Chemosphere.

[37]  A. Vajda,et al.  An environmental oestrogen disrupts fish population dynamics through direct and transgenerational effects on survival and fecundity , 2014 .

[38]  Heesup Han Travelers' pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior , 2015 .

[39]  Max Maurer,et al.  The cost of hybrid waste water systems: A systematic framework for specifying minimum cost-connection rates. , 2016, Water research.

[40]  Ashok K. Sharma,et al.  Risks and tensions in water industry innovation: understanding adoption of decentralised water systems from a socio-technical transitions perspective , 2016 .

[41]  C. Spash,et al.  The Awareness of Consequences Scale: An Exploration, Empirical Analysis, and Reinterpretation , 2012 .

[42]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[43]  Linda Steg,et al.  Values Determine the (In)Effectiveness of Informational Interventions in Promoting Pro-Environmental Behavior , 2013, PloS one.

[44]  C. Vlek,et al.  A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation , 2005 .

[45]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[46]  Linda Steg,et al.  Mean or green: which values can promote stable pro‐environmental behavior? , 2009 .