Taxi-hailing platforms: Inform or Assign drivers?

Abstract Online platforms for matching supply and demand, as part of the sharing economy, are becoming increasingly important in practice and have seen a steep increase in academic interest. Especially in the taxi/travel industry, platforms such as Uber, Lyft, and Didi Chuxing have become major players. Some of these platforms, including Didi Chuxing, operate two matching systems: Inform, where multiple drivers receive ride details and the first to respond is selected; and Assign, where the platform assigns the driver nearest to the customer. The Inform system allows drivers to select their destinations, but the Assign system minimizes driver-customer distances. This research is the first to explore: (i) how a platform should allocate customer requests to the two systems and set the maximum matching radius (i.e., customer-driver distance), with the objective to minimize the overall average waiting times for customers; and (ii) how taxi drivers select a system, depending on their varying degrees of preference for certain destinations. Using approximate queuing analysis, we derive the optimal decisions for the platform and drivers. These are applied to real-world data from Didi Chuxing, revealing the following managerial insights. The optimal radius is 1-3 kilometers, and is lower during rush hour. For most considered settings, it is optimal to allocate relatively few rides to the Inform system. Most interestingly, if destination selection becomes more important to the average driver, then the platform should not always allocate more requests to the Inform system. Although this may seem counter-intuitive, allocating too many orders to that system would result in many drivers opting for it, leading to very high waiting times in the Assign system.

[1]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A model of deadheading trips and pick-up locations for ride-hailing service vehicles , 2020 .

[2]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  Coordinating Supply and Demand on an On-Demand Service Platform with Impatient Customers , 2017, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[3]  Carlos Riquelme,et al.  Pricing in Ride-Sharing Platforms: A Queueing-Theoretic Approach , 2015, EC.

[4]  Hai Yang,et al.  Pricing strategies for a taxi-hailing platform , 2016 .

[5]  Mohsen Ramezani,et al.  Ride-Sourcing modeling and pricing in non-equilibrium two-sided markets , 2020, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[6]  M. Lariviere,et al.  Operations in the On-Demand Economy: Staffing Services with Self-Scheduling Capacity , 2016 .

[7]  Jintao Ke,et al.  Dynamic optimization strategies for on-demand ride services platform: Surge pricing, commission rate, and incentives , 2020, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[8]  P. Davis Leonhard Euler's Integral: A Historical Profile of the Gamma Function: In Memoriam: Milton Abramowitz , 1959 .

[9]  Jintao Ke,et al.  Optimizing matching time interval and matching radius in on-demand ride-sourcing markets , 2020 .

[10]  Hai Yang,et al.  Customer Behavioural Modelling of Order Cancellation in Coupled Ride-sourcing and Taxi Markets , 2019 .

[11]  Yafeng Yin,et al.  Geometric matching and spatial pricing in ride-sourcing markets , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[12]  Hai Yang,et al.  Economic Analysis of Ride-sourcing Markets , 2016 .

[13]  X. Chen,et al.  Modeling and managing heterogeneous ride-sourcing platforms with government subsidies on electric vehicles , 2020 .

[14]  Jieping Ye,et al.  On the supply curve of ride-hailing systems , 2019 .

[15]  Xiang Li,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Product Sharing: Implications for Ownership, Usage, and Social Welfare in the Sharing Economy , 2019, Manag. Sci..

[16]  James Stuart Tanton,et al.  Encyclopedia of Mathematics , 2005 .

[17]  Joseph Y. J. Chow,et al.  An agent-based day-to-day adjustment process for modeling ‘Mobility as a Service’ with a two-sided flexible transport market , 2017 .

[18]  Upender Subramanian,et al.  Your Uber Is Arriving: Managing On-Demand Workers Through Surge Pricing, Forecast Communication, and Worker Incentives , 2019, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Kostas Bimpikis,et al.  Spatial Pricing in Ride-Sharing Networks , 2019, Oper. Res..

[20]  Zhen Wang,et al.  Online car-hailing dispatch: Deep supply-demand gap forecast on spark , 2017, 2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Big Data Analysis (ICBDA)(.

[21]  Hai Yang,et al.  Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review , 2019, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[22]  Yafeng Yin,et al.  Surge pricing and labor supply in the ride-sourcing market , 2018, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[23]  Zuo-Jun Max Shen,et al.  Modeling taxi services with smartphone-based e-hailing applications , 2015 .

[24]  Rouba Ibrahim,et al.  On Queues with a Random Capacity: Some Theory, and an Application , 2019, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management.

[25]  Shing Chung Josh Wong,et al.  Equlibrium of Bilateral Taxi-Customer Searching and Meeting on Networks , 2010 .

[26]  E. Glen Weyl,et al.  Surge Pricing Solves the Wild Goose Chase , 2017, EC.

[27]  Ming Hu,et al.  Price, Wage, and Fixed Commission in On-Demand Matching , 2019 .

[28]  Hai Yang,et al.  Equilibrium properties of taxi markets with search frictions , 2011 .

[29]  Terry Taylor On-Demand Service Platforms , 2017 .

[30]  Baojun Jiang,et al.  The Strategic and Economic Implications of Consumer-to-Consumer Product Sharing , 2019, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management.

[31]  R. Cervero,et al.  Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco , 2016 .

[32]  Zizhuo Wang,et al.  We are on the Way: Analysis of On-Demand Ride-Hailing Systems , 2017, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[33]  Mingjun Xiao,et al.  Optimal Multi-taxi Dispatch for Mobile Taxi-Hailing Systems , 2016, 2016 45th International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP).

[34]  Ruud H. Teunter,et al.  Optimal pricing for ride-sourcing platforms , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Jianbin Huang,et al.  A Balanced Assignment Mechanism for Online Taxi Recommendation , 2017, 2017 18th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM).

[36]  Ming Hu,et al.  Dynamic Type Matching , 2016, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..