Understanding the Operational Dynamics of Mobility Service Providers

The rise of mobility service providers (MSPs) is reforming the traditional taxi service (TTS) market. MSPs differ from TTS with the core idea of using technology to optimally match riders with drivers, features like ride-sharing and surge pricing, and are not entry-regulated. It is of great significance to understand how MSPs operate and how we can integrate them with TTS for efficient urban mobility. Unfortunately, little is known about MSPs due to limited data revealed by them. In this study, we collect and mine the trajectory data of online drivers who serve Uber (one of the largest MSP) to demystify how Uber drives their drivers. We analyze the trip patterns of different Uber services and reveal their market share, trip metrics, and the spatial distributions of trip origins and destinations. We explore how MSPs improve the driver-rider matching efficiency and empirically validate the enormous efficiency gap between TTS and MSPs. In the end, we debunk the surge price as an instrument to restore driver-rider balance theory and show that drivers choose to chase or avoid the high surge areas depending on various other factors such as traffic congestion, time and location, and availability of alternate travel options as well. The results of this article provide insightful knowledge about the supply side of MSPs and contribute to new ideas on improving TTS and regulating MSPs.

[1]  S. Ukkusuri,et al.  Taxi market equilibrium with third-party hailing service , 2017 .

[2]  Hua Cai,et al.  Understanding taxi travel patterns , 2016 .

[3]  A. Krueger,et al.  An Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber’s Driver-Partners in the United States , 2016 .

[4]  Christo Wilson,et al.  Peeking Beneath the Hood of Uber , 2015, Internet Measurement Conference.

[5]  S. Ukkusuri,et al.  Spatial variation of the urban taxi ridership using GPS data , 2015 .

[6]  Ke Xu,et al.  Understanding ride-on-demand service: Demand and dynamic pricing , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops).

[7]  Judd N. L. Cramer,et al.  Disruptive Change in the Taxi Business: The Case of Uber , 2016 .

[8]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  Identifying the Temporal Characteristics of Intra-City Movement Using Taxi Geo-Location Data , 2017 .

[9]  Shin'ichi Konomi,et al.  Enriching Urban Spaces with Ambient Computing, the Internet of Things, and Smart City Design , 2016 .

[10]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Geographically Weighted Regression , 2006, Technometrics.

[11]  S. Ukkusuri,et al.  Characterizing Urban Dynamics Using Large Scale Taxicab Data , 2015 .

[12]  Camille Kamga,et al.  Hailing in the Rain: Temporal and Weather-Related Variations in Taxi Ridership and Taxi Demand-Supply Equilibrium , 2013 .

[13]  Hai Yang,et al.  Economic Analysis of Ride-sourcing Markets , 2016 .

[14]  Eric J. Gonzales,et al.  Modeling Taxi Trip Demand by Time of Day in New York City , 2014 .

[15]  Ke Xu,et al.  Understanding passenger reaction to dynamic prices in ride-on-demand service , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops).

[16]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  Impacts of urban built environment on empty taxi trips using limited geolocation data , 2017 .

[17]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  A Graph-Based Approach to Measuring the Efficiency of an Urban Taxi Service System , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.