When local interaction does not suffice : Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway

The geographical sources of innovation of firms have been hotly debated. While the traditional view is that physical proximity within city-regions is key for the innovative capacity of firms, the literature on ‘global pipelines’ has been stressing the importance of establishing communication channels to the outside world. This paper uses a specifically tailored survey of the level of innovation of 1604 firms of more than ten employees located in the five largest Norwegian city-regions (Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger, Trondheim, and Kristiansand) in order to determine (a) the geographical dimension of the sources of innovation, and (b) the factors behind the propensity to innovate in Norwegian firms. The results stress that, while interaction with a multitude of partners within Norwegian city-regions or with other national partners has a negligible effect on firm innovation, those firms with a greater diversity of international partners tend to innovate more and introduce more radical innovations. The results also highlight that the roots of this greater innovative capacity lie in a combination of firm (size of firms, share of foreign ownership, and sector) and cultural (the level of open-mindedness of managers) characteristics.

[1]  Anders Malmberg,et al.  Competitiveness, Localised Learning and Regional Development: Specialization and Prosperity in Small Open Economies , 1998 .

[2]  A. Isaksen.  Innovation Dynamics of Global Competitive Regional Clusters: The Case of the Norwegian Centres of Expertise , 2009 .

[3]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) , 2003 .

[4]  Harald Bathelt,et al.  Regional competence and economic recovery: divergent growth paths in Boston's high technology economy , 2001 .

[5]  K. Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth , 2007 .

[6]  P. McCann,et al.  Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks? , 2000, Urban Studies.

[7]  Rikard Eriksson,et al.  Localized mobility clusters: impacts of labour market externalities on firm performance , 2008 .

[8]  Hugh Dalziel Duncan,et al.  Culture and Democracy. , 1967 .

[9]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[10]  Edward J. Malecki,et al.  Making Connections: Technological Learning and Regional Economic Change , 1999 .

[11]  C. Trigilia.  Sviluppo senza autonomia : effetti perversi delle politiche nel Mezzogiorno , 1992 .

[12]  David A. Wolfe,et al.  Clusters from the Inside and Out: Local Dynamics and Global Linkages , 2004 .

[13]  A. Bagnasco,et al.  La costruzione sociale del mercato : studi sullo sviluppo di piccola impresa in Italia , 1988 .

[14]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al.  Innovating in the Periphery: Firms, Values and Innovation in Southwest Norway , 2011 .

[15]  D. Doloreux,et al.  Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatière, Canada , 2008 .

[16]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy , 2009 .

[17]  Tom Middlebro,et al.  Culture and Democracy , 1994 .

[18]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Face-to-Face, Buzz, and Knowledge Bases: Sociospatial Implications for Learning, Innovation, and Innovation Policy , 2007 .

[19]  A. Malmberg,et al.  (How) Do (Firms in) Clusters Create Knowledge? , 2005 .

[20]  Samuel P. Huntington,et al.  Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress , 2001 .

[21]  E. Malecki.  Knowledge and regional competitiveness , 2000 .

[22]  Jerker Moodysson,et al.  Principles and Practices of Knowledge Creation: On the Organization of “Buzz” and “Pipelines” in Life Science Communities , 2008 .

[23]  Rikard Eriksson,et al.  How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity , 2008 .

[24]  Riccardo Crescenzi,et al.  Research and Development, Spillovers, Innovation Systems, and the Genesis of Regional Growth in Europe , 2006 .

[25]  F. Tödtling,et al.  Knowledge Sourcing Beyond Buzz and Pipelines: Evidence from the Vienna Software Sector , 2009 .

[26]  Bowen H. McCoy.  CULTURE MATTERS: How VALUES SHAPE HUMAN PROGRESS , 2000 .

[27]  R. Boschma.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[28]  John T. Jackson,et al.  MANAGING CITIES. THE NEW URBAN CONTEXT , 1997 .

[29]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .

[30]  D. Doloreux,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues , 2005 .

[31]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Towards a Knowledge‐based Theory of the Geographical Cluster , 2001 .

[32]  David A. Wolfe,et al.  SPACES OF KNOWLEDGE FLOWS: CLUSTERS IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT , 2005 .

[33]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[34]  Jerker Moodysson,et al.  Knowledge Collaboration and Proximity , 2007 .

[35]  Ragnar Torvik,et al.  Institutions and the Resource Curse , 2006 .

[36]  A. Markusen.  Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts* , 1996 .

[37]  Anders Malmberg,et al.  Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters , 2006 .

[38]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  “Being There”: Proximity, Organization, and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies , 1995 .

[39]  M. Brachert,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Functions: A spatial panel approach , 2013 .

[40]  P. Swann,et al.  Do firms in clusters innovate more , 1998 .

[41]  Arne Isaksen,et al.  Technology Cities in Norway: Innovating in Glocal Networks , 2007 .

[42]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Explaining Spatial Patterns of Innovation: Analytical and Synthetic Modes of Knowledge Creation in the Medicon Valley Life-Science Cluster , 2008 .