The U.S. tax gap is estimated to exceed $450 billion, most of which arises from non-compliance on the part of individual taxpayers (GAO 2012; IRS 2006). Much is hidden in innovative tax shelters combining multiple business structures such as partnerships, trusts, and S-corporations into complex transaction networks designed to reduce and obscure the true tax liabilities of their individual shareholders. One known gambit employed by these shelters is to offset real gains in one part of a portfolio by creating artificial capital losses elsewhere through the mechanism of “inflated basis” (TaxAnalysts 2005), a process made easier by the relatively flexible set of rules surrounding “pass-through” entities such as partnerships (IRS 2009). The ability to anticipate the likely forms of emerging evasion schemes would help auditors develop more efficient methods of reducing the tax gap. To this end, we have developed a prototype evolutionary algorithm designed to generate potential schemes of the inflated basis type described above. The algorithm takes as inputs a collection of asset types and tax entities, together with a rule-set governing asset exchanges between these entities. The schemes produced by the algorithm consist of sequences of transactions within an ownership network of tax entities. Schemes are ranked according to a “fitness function” (Goldberg in Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 1989); the very best schemes are those that afford the highest reduction in tax liability while incurring the lowest expected penalty.
[1]
Kevin T. Comer,et al.
An agent-based model of network effects on tax compliance and evasion
,
2014
.
[2]
Del Wright,et al.
Financial Alchemy: How Tax Shelter Promoters Use Financial Products to Bedevil the IRS (and How the IRS Helps Them)
,
2013
.
[3]
Gary William Hecht,et al.
Social Behaviors, Enforcement, and Tax Compliance Dynamics
,
2003
.
[4]
Brad G. Kyer.
Review of 5 of biologically inspired algorithms for financial modelling by Anthony Brabazon, Michael O'Neill Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2006
,
2010,
SIGA.
[5]
David E. Goldberg,et al.
Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning
,
1988
.
[6]
Agnar Sandmo,et al.
Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis
,
1972
.
[7]
Mak Kaboudan,et al.
Biologically Inspired Algorithms for Financial Modelling
,
2006,
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines.
[8]
Kim M. Bloomquist.
A Comparison of Agent-Based Models of Income Tax Evasion
,
2006
.
[9]
Michael Pickhardt,et al.
Income Tax Evasion in a Society of Heterogeneous Agents – Evidence from an Agent-based Model
,
2010
.