Analysis of pick-and-place, eating and drinking movements for the workspace definition of simple robotic devices

Current robotic devices for rehabilitation after stroke are often large and complex as they are conceived to train arbitrary movements in the 3D space. This paper analyzes the minimal requirements that the workspace of a robotic device should have in order to promote training of principal activities of daily living, considering the shoulder movement's limitations of subacute patients. Pick-and-place, drinking and eating movements of five healthy subjects were analyzed. In all these three tasks, approximately 82% of all trials deviate laterally less than 5% of the target distance and we recommend target distances of less than 40% of the arm length in order to minimize improper shoulder movements. The study can be applied for designing simpler, yet efficient robotic devices for rehabilitation of the upper limb or for constraining exercises on existing ones when dealing with stroke patients, especially for those prone to shoulder complications (e.g. subacute patients).

[1]  R.C.V. Loureiro,et al.  Reach & Grasp Therapy: Design and Control of a 9-DOF Robotic Neuro-rehabilitation System , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[2]  S.C. Cramer,et al.  A robotic device for hand motor therapy after stroke , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[3]  N. Hogan,et al.  Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  R. Riener,et al.  ARMin - Exoskeleton for Arm Therapy in Stroke Patients , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[5]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  Rehabilitation of grasping and forearm pronation/supination with the Haptic Knob , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[6]  K. Nagai,et al.  Structural Design of an Escort Type Rehabilitation Robot for Post-Stroke Therapies of Upper-Limb , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[7]  J. Patton,et al.  Design of a Mobile, Inexpensive Device for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation at Home , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[8]  R. Gassert,et al.  A Cable Driven Robotic System to Train Finger Function After Stroke , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[9]  J.A. Galvez,et al.  Some Key Problems for Robot-Assisted Movement Therapy Research: A Perspective from the University of California at Irvine , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[10]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  A. Jackson,et al.  User involvement in developing Rehabilitation Robotic devices: An essential requirement , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[12]  Chee Leong Teo,et al.  A Haptic Knob for Rehabilitation of Hand Function , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  W. Rymer,et al.  Effect of robot-assisted and unassisted exercise on functional reaching in chronic hemiparesis , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.