Mapping the 12-item multiple sclerosis walking scale to the EuroQol 5-dimension index measure in North American multiple sclerosis patients

Objective To map the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) onto the EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) health-utility index in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients participating in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) registry. Design Cross-sectional MSWS-12 to EQ-5D cross-walking analysis. Setting NARCOMS registry spring 2010 biannual update and supplemental survey. Participants North American patients completing both the MSWS-12 and the EQ-5D randomly split into derivation and validation cohorts. Outcome measures Ordinary least squares regression was performed within the derivation cohort, with participants’ EQ-5D as the dependent variable. Results of the MSWS-12 were input as independent variable(s) into six regression models. Model goodness-of-fit was subsequently assessed in the validation cohort using the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE) and the adjusted R2. The best performing model was refined in the entire cohort and utilised for additional analyses. Results A total of 3505 NARCOMS participants were included. Their mean±SD EQ-5D and MSWS-12 scores were 0.74±0.18 and 50.8±33.5, respectively, and these assessments were found to be moderately correlated (r=–0.553, p<0.001). The model using all individual MSWS-12 item scores as independent variables was found to have the best fit (MAE=0.109±0.096, RMSE=0.145, adjusted R2=0.329). The percentage of EQ-5D estimates within 0.05 and 0.10 of the actual value were 30% and 61%, respectively. This mapping equation was more precise in patients with moderate mobility impairment (MAE=0.087±0.061 at patient-determined disease step (PDDS) of 3–6) and less precise in patients with no (MAE=0.141±0.128 at PDDS of 0–2) or severe mobility impairment (MAE=0.121±0.049 at PDDS ≥7). Conclusions The EQ-5D scores can be predicted using the MSWS-12 item scores with reasonable precision in North American patients with MS. Prediction estimates were more precise in patients with moderate mobility impairment.

[1]  R. Marrie,et al.  Validity of performance scales for disability assessment in multiple sclerosis , 2007, Multiple sclerosis.

[2]  A J Thompson,et al.  Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability , 2003, Neurology.

[3]  W. L. Benedict,et al.  Multiple Sclerosis , 2007, Journal - Michigan State Medical Society.

[4]  Stephen Joel Coons,et al.  US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States: Development and Testing of the D1 Valuation Model , 2005, Medical care.

[5]  A. Minagar A Phase 3 Trial of Extended Release Oral Dalfampridine in Multiple Sclerosis , 2011 .

[6]  E J Orav,et al.  Disease steps in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study comparing Disease Steps and EDSS to evaluate disease progression , 1999, Multiple sclerosis.

[7]  Oliver Rivero-Arias,et al.  Estimating the Association between SF-12 Responses and EQ-5D Utility Values by Response Mapping , 2006, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[8]  J. Brazier,et al.  Deriving preference-based single indices from non-preference based condition-specific instruments: converting AQLQ into EQ5D indices , 2002 .

[9]  J. Zajicek,et al.  The use of multiple sclerosis condition-specific measures to inform health policy decision-making: mapping from the MSWS-12 to the EQ-5D , 2012, Multiple sclerosis.

[10]  L. Krupp,et al.  Sustained-release oral fampridine in multiple sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[11]  E. Frohman Multiple sclerosis. , 2003, The Medical clinics of North America.

[12]  N. Larocca Impact of Walking Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis , 2011, The patient.

[13]  V. Akila,et al.  Information , 2001, The Lancet.

[14]  Peter Lindgren,et al.  Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis , 2001, The European Journal of Health Economics (HEPAC).

[15]  L. Krupp,et al.  A phase 3 trial of extended release oral dalfampridine in multiple sclerosis , 2010, Annals of neurology.

[16]  Aki Tsuchiya,et al.  A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures , 2010, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[17]  M. Gold Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine , 2016 .

[18]  J. Brazier,et al.  converting AQLQ into EQ5D indices , 2011 .