Multidimensional Management of Geospatial Data Quality Information for its Dynamic Use Within GIS

Metadata should help users to assess the quality (fitness for use) of geospatial data, thus reducing the risk of data misuse. However, metadata presents limitations and remain largely unused. There still exists a need to provide information to users about data quality in a more meaningful way. This research aims to dynamically communicate quality information to the users in a rapid and intuitive way in order to reduce user meta-uncertainty related to geospatial data quality, and then reduce the risks of data misuses. Such a solution requires a data model able to support heterogeneous data quality information at different levels of analysis. Using a multidimensional database approach, this paper proposes a conceptual framework named the Quality Information Management Model (QIMM) relying on quality dimensions and measures. This allows a user to easily and rapidly navigate into the quality information using a Spatial On-Line Analytical Processing (SOLAP) client-tied to its GIS application. QIMM potential is illustrated by examples, and then a prototype and ways to communicate data quality to users are explored.

[1]  Joseph Moses Juran,et al.  Quality-control handbook , 1951 .

[2]  D. Unwin.  Geographical information systems and the problem of 'error and uncertainty' , 1995 .

[3]  Sami Othman Faiz.  Modelisation, exploitation et visualisation de l'information qualite dans les bases de donnees geographiques , 1996 .

[4]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Gary L. Raines,et al.  Elements of spatial data quality , 1997 .

[6]  Martin Raubal,et al.  Experiences with metadata , 1997 .

[7]  Alex Berson,et al.  Data Warehousing, Data Mining, and OLAP , 1997 .

[8]  M. Curry.  Digital Places: Living with Geographic Information Technologies , 1998 .

[9]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Geographic Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 2001 .

[10]  Yvan Bédard,et al.  Toward better support for spatial decision making: Defining the characteristics of spatial on-line analytical processing (SOLAP) , 2001 .

[11]  Gary J. Hunter,et al.  Responding to the consequences of uncertainty in geographical data , 2002, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Matt Duckham,et al.  Error-aware GIS Development , 2002 .

[13]  Robert Jeansoulin,et al.  SPATIAL DATA QUALITY: FROM METADATA TO QUALITY INDICATORS AND CONTEXTUAL END-USER MANUAL , 2002 .

[14]  Gary J Hunter,et al.  A GIS with the Capacity for Managing Data Quality Information , 2002 .

[15]  Marc Gervais,et al.  Pertinence d'un manuel d'instructions au sein d'une stratégie de gestion du risque juridique découlant de la fourniture de données géographiques numériques , 2003 .

[16]  Yvan Bédard,et al.  Integrating GIS components with knowledge discovery technology for environmental health decision support , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[17]  Wenzhong Shi,et al.  Theme issue: advanced techniques for analysis of geo-spatial data , 2004 .

[18]  Geoffrey Edwards,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of a hypercube-based method for spatiotemporal exploration and analysis , 2004 .