Processing Load Induced by Informational Masking Is Related to Linguistic Abilities
暂无分享,去创建一个
Jerker Rönnberg | Adriana A. Zekveld | Sophia E. Kramer | Joost M. Festen | Thomas Koelewijn | A. Zekveld | S. Kramer | J. Festen | T. Koelewijn | J. Rönnberg
[1] A. M. Mimpen,et al. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[2] Tammo Houtgast,et al. Measuring cognitive factors in speech comprehension: the value of using the Text Reception Threshold test as a visual equivalent of the SRT test. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.
[3] A. Zekveld,et al. Pupil Response as an Indication of Effortful Listening: The Influence of Sentence Intelligibility , 2010, Ear and hearing.
[4] A. M. Mimpen,et al. Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] Colin Humphries,et al. Syntactic and Semantic Modulation of Neural Activity during Auditory Sentence Comprehension , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[6] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] J. Beatty. Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.
[9] Jerker Rönnberg,et al. Episodic long-term memory of spoken discourse masked by speech: what is the role for working memory capacity? , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[10] I L Bailey,et al. The Design and Use of a New Near‐Vision Chart , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.
[11] M. K. Pickora-Fuller. Processing speed and timing in aging adults: psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension. , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[12] Elizabeth D. Hickman,et al. Effect of age on binaural speech intelligibility in normal hearing adults , 2006, Speech Commun..
[13] J. Theeuwes,et al. Attention and the multiple stages of multisensory integration: A review of audiovisual studies. , 2010, Acta psychologica.
[14] Robert H. Logie,et al. Components of fluent reading , 1985 .
[15] D Kahneman,et al. Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.
[16] Alexander L. Francis,et al. Effects of intelligibility on working memory demand for speech perception , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[17] Anna Piotrowska,et al. Processing load during listening: The influence of task characteristics on the pupil response , 2013 .
[18] T Houtgast,et al. Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] T. Lunner,et al. The emergence of cognitive hearing science. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.
[20] P. Carpenter,et al. Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .
[21] A. Zekveld,et al. New measures of masked text recognition in relation to speech-in-noise perception and their associations with age and cognitive abilities. , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[22] Patrik Sörqvist,et al. A sub-process view of working memory capacity: Evidence from effects of speech on prose memory , 2010, Memory.
[23] Graham Naylor,et al. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 2. Patterns of candidature , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[24] Jerker Rönnberg,et al. Cognitive and communicative function : The effects of chronological age and "handicap age" , 1990 .
[25] Michael F. Bunting,et al. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[26] Graham Naylor,et al. Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[27] Richard P. Heitz,et al. Effects of incentive on working memory capacity: behavioral and pupillometric data. , 2007, Psychophysiology.
[28] J. Rönnberg. Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: a framework and a model , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[29] M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al. Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[30] Tammo Houtgast,et al. The development of the text reception threshold test: a visual analogue of the speech reception threshold test. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[31] T. Lunner,et al. Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU) , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[32] D. Baguley,et al. A vision for tinnitus research , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[33] A. Zekveld,et al. Cognitive Load During Speech Perception in Noise: The Influence of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognition on the Pupil Response , 2011, Ear and hearing.
[34] J Hyönä,et al. Pupil Dilation as a Measure of Processing Load in Simultaneous Interpretation and Other Language Tasks , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[35] Thomas Lunner,et al. Cognition and hearing aids. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.
[36] Thomas Lunner,et al. When cognition kicks in: working memory and speech understanding in noise. , 2010, Noise & health.
[37] J M Festen,et al. Assessing aspects of auditory handicap by means of pupil dilatation. , 1997, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[38] Gregory G. Brown,et al. Brain activation and pupil response during covert performance of the Stroop Color Word task , 1999, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.
[39] M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al. Cognitive aging and auditory information processing , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[40] Thomas Lunner,et al. Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[41] D. Talsma,et al. Methods for the estimation and removal of artifacts and overlap in ERP data , 2004 .
[42] L E Humes,et al. Speech identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: the contributions of auditory processing deficits. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[43] Tammo Houtgast,et al. Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[44] M. Akeroyd. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[45] Mark S. Gilzenrat,et al. Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[46] Brent Edwards,et al. The Future of Hearing Aid Technology , 2007, Trends in amplification.
[47] A. Zekveld,et al. Pupil Dilation Uncovers Extra Listening Effort in the Presence of a Single-Talker Masker , 2012, Ear and hearing.
[48] Ingrid S. Johnsrude,et al. Behavioral and fMRI evidence that cognitive ability modulates the effect of semantic context on speech intelligibility , 2012, Brain and Language.
[49] T. Busey,et al. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[50] D. Kahneman,et al. Attention and Effort , 1973 .
[51] M. Daneman,et al. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[52] K E Spens,et al. Cognitive correlates of visual speech understanding in hearing-impaired individuals. , 2001, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.
[53] Tutut Herawan,et al. Computational and mathematical methods in medicine. , 2006, Computational and mathematical methods in medicine.