Efficacy of a theory-based behavioural intervention to increase physical activity in an at-risk group in primary care (ProActive UK): a randomised trial

BACKGROUND Declining physical activity is associated with a rising burden of global disease. Efforts to reverse this trend have not been successful. We aimed to assess the efficacy of a facilitated behavioural intervention to increase the physical activity of sedentary individuals at familial risk of diabetes. METHODS We enrolled 365 sedentary adults who had a parental history of type 2 diabetes. They were recruited from either diabetes or family history registers at 20 general practice clinics in the UK. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups, or to a comparison group. All participants were posted a brief advice leaflet. One intervention group was offered a 1-year behaviour-change programme, to be delivered by trained facilitators in participants' homes, and the other the same programme by telephone. The programme was designed to alter behavioural determinants, as defined by the theory of planned behaviour, and to teach behaviour-change strategies. The principal outcome at 1 year was daytime physical activity, which was objectively measured as a ratio to resting energy expenditure. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as ISRCTN61323766. FINDINGS Of 365 patients, we analysed primary endpoints for 321 (88%) for whom we had data after 1 year of follow-up. At 1 year, the physical-activity ratio of participants who received the intervention, by either delivery route, did not differ from the ratio in those who were given a brief advice leaflet. The mean difference in daytime physical-activity ratio, adjusted for baseline, was -0.04 (95% CI -0.16 to 0.08). The physical-activity ratio did not differ between participants who were delivered the intervention face-to-face or by telephone (mean difference -0.05; 95% CI -0.19 to 0.10). INTERPRETATION A facilitated theory-based behavioural intervention was no more effective than an advice leaflet for promotion of physical activity in an at-risk group; therefore health-care providers should remain cautious about commissioning behavioural programmes into individual preventive health-care services.

[1]  N. Day,et al.  Feasibility of heart-rate monitoring to estimate total level and pattern of energy expenditure in a population-based epidemiological study: the Ely young cohort feasibility study 1994–5 , 1997, British Journal of Nutrition.

[2]  R. Shephard,et al.  A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. , 1969, Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport.

[3]  M. Thorogood,et al.  Interventions for promoting physical activity. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  T. Marteau,et al.  The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). , 1992, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[5]  R. Wing,et al.  Lifestyle Intervention in Overweight Individuals With a Family History of Diabetes , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[6]  R. Dishman,et al.  Increasing physical activity: a quantitative synthesis. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  William Hollingworth,et al.  BMC Public Health BioMed Central Study protocol , 2004 .

[8]  W. James,et al.  Physical activity and its impact on health outcomes. Paper 2: prevention of unhealthy weight gain and obesity by physical activity: an analysis of the evidence , 2002, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[9]  Willem van Mechelen,et al.  Effect of a tailored physical activity intervention delivered in general practice settings: results of a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, American journal of public health.

[10]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[11]  Timothy M. Morgan,et al.  Effects of physical activity counseling in primary care: the Activity Counseling Trial: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, JAMA.

[12]  Peter E. Hilsenrath,et al.  The World Health Report 2000 , 2002 .

[13]  Guilbert Jj.  The world health report 2002 - reducing risks, promoting healthy life. , 2003 .

[14]  Jo Mitchell,et al.  Validity and repeatability of a simple index derived from the short physical activity questionnaire used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study , 2003, Public Health Nutrition.

[15]  R. Hamman.  Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes , 2003 .

[16]  Y. Benyamini,et al.  Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. , 1997, Journal of health and social behavior.

[17]  Neil D. Weinstein,et al.  Perceptions of personal susceptibility to harm. , 1989 .

[18]  Stephen Sutton,et al.  A causal modelling approach to the development of theory-based behaviour change programmes for trial evaluation. , 2005, Health education research.

[19]  K. Khaw,et al.  Family history of diabetes identifies a group at increased risk for the metabolic consequences of obesity and physical inactivity in EPIC-Norfolk: a population-based study , 2000, International Journal of Obesity.

[20]  N J Wareham,et al.  The assessment of physical activity in individuals and populations: why try to be more precise about how physical activity is assessed? , 1998, International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[21]  U. P. S. T. Force.  Behavioral Counseling in Primary Care To Promote Physical Activity: Recommendation and Rationale , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[22]  B. Trock,et al.  Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. , 1991, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[23]  D. Simons-Morton,et al.  Effects of interventions in health care settings on physical activity or cardiorespiratory fitness. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[24]  J. Twisk,et al.  Physical activity measurements affected participants' behavior in a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  C. Mulrow,et al.  Does Counseling by Clinicians Improve Physical Activity? A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  N. Day,et al.  Validity and repeatability of the EPIC-Norfolk Physical Activity Questionnaire. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[27]  M. Wong,et al.  Glucose intolerance and physical inactivity: the relative importance of low habitual energy expenditure and cardiorespiratory fitness. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[28]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[29]  Ann Louise Kinmonth,et al.  General practice Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice : impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk , 1998 .

[30]  C. Abraham,et al.  Interventions to change health behaviours: evidence-based or evidence-inspired? , 2004 .

[31]  Ian R White,et al.  Adjusting for partially missing baseline measurements in randomized trials , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[32]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[33]  George W. Albee,et al.  Primary Prevention of AIDS: Psychological Approaches , 1989 .

[34]  T. Marteau,et al.  The psychological impact of cardiovascular screening and intervention in primary care: a problem of false reassurance? British Family Heart Study Group. , 1996, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.