1. On the Assignment of Individuals to Latent Classes

Consider an m-way cross-classification table (for m = 3, 4, …) of m dichotomous variables that describes (1) the 2m possible response patterns to a set of m questions (where the response to each question is binary), and (2) the number of individuals whose responses to the m questions can be described by a particular response pattern, for each of the 2m possible response patterns. Consider the situation where the data in the cross-classification table are analyzed using a particular latent class model having T latent classes (for T = 2, 3, …), and where this model fits the data well. With this latent class model, it is possible to estimate, for an individual who has a particular response pattern, what is the conditional probability that this individual is in a particular latent class, for each of the T latent classes. In this article, the following question is considered: For an individual who has a particular response pattern, can we use the corresponding estimated conditional probabilities to assign this individual to one of the T latent classes? Two different assignment procedures are considered here, and for each of these procedures, two different criteria are introduced to help assess when the assignment procedure is satisfactory and when it is not. In addition, we describe here the particular framework and context in which the two assignment procedures, and the two criteria, are considered. For illustrative purposes, the latent class analysis of a classic set of data, a four-way cross-classification of some survey data, obtained in a two-wave panel study, is discussed; and the two different criteria introduced herein are applied in this analysis to each of the two assignment procedures.

[1]  P. Deb.  Finite Mixture Models , 2008 .

[2]  L. A. Goodman.  New Methods for Analyzing the Intrinsic Character of Qualitative Variables Using Cross-Classified Data , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[4]  L. A. Goodman.  Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models , 1974 .

[5]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS LATENT STRUCTURE ANALYSIS IN SEVERAL GROUPS , 1985 .

[6]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Latent Structure Analysis of a Set of Multidimensional Contingency Tables , 1984 .

[7]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Measures of association for cross classifications , 1979 .

[8]  J. Hagenaars,et al.  Applied Latent Class Analysis , 2003 .

[9]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  Statistical Magic and/or Statistical Serendipity: An Age of Progress in the Analysis of Categorical Data , 2007 .

[10]  L. A. Goodman.  The Analysis of Systems of Qualitative Variables When Some of the Variables Are Unobservable. Part I-A Modified Latent Structure Approach , 1974, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Jay Magidson,et al.  Latent Class Factor and Cluster Models, Bi-Plots, and Related Graphical Displays , 2001 .

[12]  J. Coleman.  Introduction to Mathematical Sociology , 1965 .

[13]  L. A. Goodman.  Applied Latent Class Analysis: Latent Class Analysis: The Empirical Study of Latent Types, Latent Variables, and Latent Structures , 2002 .