On the inappropriateness of noninvasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiography.

[1]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Mario J. Garcia,et al.  ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  Frederick A. Masoudi,et al.  ACCF/SCAI/STS/MTS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization. Commentary , 2009 .

[4]  Grace A Lin,et al.  Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2008, JAMA.

[5]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Guido Germano,et al.  Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy , 2008, Circulation.

[7]  D. Berman,et al.  Clinical imaging for prevention: Directed strategies for improved detection of presymptomatic patients with undetected atherosclerosis—Part I: Clinical imaging for prevention , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[8]  William Wijns,et al.  Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. , 2007, Radiology.

[9]  William Wijns,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  W. Wijns,et al.  What does the clinical cardiologist need from noninvasive cardiac imaging: Is it time to adjust practices to meet evolving demands? , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[11]  D. Berman,et al.  Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  W. Wijns,et al.  Multi-detector CT of the coronary arteries. Potential use of CT angiography and coronary artery calcium scoring in screening. , 2007, JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie.

[13]  Maria Siebes,et al.  Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. , 2006, Circulation.

[14]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  Gabriel P. Krestin,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris , 2006, European Radiology.

[16]  Gabriel P. Krestin,et al.  High-Resolution Spiral Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients Referred for Diagnostic Conventional Coronary Angiography , 2005, Circulation.

[17]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2005, European heart journal.

[18]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  B. Meier.  Plaque sealing by coronary angioplasty , 2004, Heart.

[20]  W. Wijns,et al.  Intracoronary and Intravenous Adenosine 5′-Triphosphate, Adenosine, Papaverine, and Contrast Medium to Assess Fractional Flow Reserve in Humans , 2003, Circulation.

[21]  B. Gersh,et al.  Clinical and angiographic outcome of patients with mild coronary lesions treated with balloon angioplasty or coronary stenting. Implications for mechanical plaque sealing. , 2003, European heart journal.

[22]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Joseph S Alpert,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Habib Samady,et al.  Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  K. Gould,et al.  Abnormal Epicardial Coronary Resistance in Patients With Diffuse Atherosclerosis but “Normal” Coronary Angiography , 2001, Circulation.

[26]  William Wijns,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the Appropriateness of Angioplasty in Moderate Coronary Stenosis: A Randomized Trial , 2001, Circulation.

[27]  K. Watson.  Pathophysiology of Coronary Calcification , 2000, Journal of Cardiovascular Risk.

[28]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. , 1995, Circulation.

[30]  J. Bartunek,et al.  Quantitative coronary angiography in predicting functional significance of stenoses in an unselected patient cohort. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  B. Kimball,et al.  Systematic bias in the reporting of angioplasty outcomes: accuracy of visual estimates of absolute lumen diameters. , 1994, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[32]  N. Schork,et al.  Analysis of Coronary Angioplasty Practice in the United States With an Insurance‐Claims Data Base , 1993, Circulation.

[33]  Robert Califf,et al.  Value of the History and Physical in Identifying Patients at Increased Risk for Coronary Artery Disease , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[34]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.

[36]  M. Schoenfeld.  64. Serum cholesterol as an acute phase reactant , 1965 .