Randomized phase II trials: time for a new era in clinical trial design.

The classic single-arm oncology phase II trial designs for evaluating an experimental regimen/agent are limited by multiple sources of bias arising from the inability to separate trial effects (such as patient selection, trial eligibility, imaging techniques and assessment schedule, and treatment locations) from treatment effect on clinical outcomes. Changes in patient population based on biologic subsetting, newer imaging technologies, the use of alternative end points, constrained resources, and the multitude of promising therapies for a given disease make randomized phase II designs, with a concurrent control arm where necessary, attractive. In this brief report, we discuss the salient features of the randomized designs for phase II trials, which when properly applied under the constraints of their underlying inference framework can assure optimal use of limited phase III financial and patient resources.

[1]  D. Sargent,et al.  Pick the winner designs in phase II cancer clinical trials. , 2006, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[2]  Boris Freidlin,et al.  Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  T. Bekaii-Saab,et al.  Phase II Randomized Study of Two Regimens of Sequentially Administered Mitomycin C and Irinotecan in Patients with Unresectable Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[4]  H. Wieand,et al.  Randomized phase II trials: what does randomization gain? , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Robert Gray,et al.  Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Larry Rubinstein,et al.  Randomized Phase II Designs , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  David M Jablons,et al.  Randomized phase II trial comparing bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  D J Sargent,et al.  A flexible design for multiple armed screening trials , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  Seth M Steinberg,et al.  Early selection in a randomized phase II clinical trial , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  Zhiguo Li,et al.  Comparing an experimental agent to a standard agent: relative merits of a one-arm or randomized two-arm Phase II design , 2006, Clinical trials.