Towards Uncertainty-Assisted Brain Tumor Segmentation and Survival Prediction

Uncertainty measures of medical image analysis technologies, such as deep learning, are expected to facilitate their clinical acceptance and synergies with human expertise. Therefore, we propose a full-resolution residual convolutional neural network (FRRN) for brain tumor segmentation and examine the principle of Monte Carlo (MC) Dropout for uncertainty quantification by focusing on the Dropout position and rate. We further feed the resulting brain tumor segmentation into a survival prediction model, which is built on age and a subset of 26 image-derived geometrical features such as volume, volume ratios, surface, surface irregularity and statistics of the enhancing tumor rim width. The results show comparable segmentation performance between MC Dropout models and a standard weight scaling Dropout model. A qualitative evaluation further suggests that informative uncertainty can be obtained by applying MC Dropout after each convolution layer. For survival prediction, results suggest only using few features besides age. In the BraTS17 challenge, our method achieved the 2nd place in the survival task and completed the segmentation task in the 3rd best-performing cluster of statistically different approaches.

[1]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.

[2]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[3]  Roberto Cipolla,et al.  Bayesian SegNet: Model Uncertainty in Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architectures for Scene Understanding , 2015, BMVC.

[4]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS) , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[6]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  GPSSI: Gaussian Process for Sampling Segmentations of Images , 2015, MICCAI.

[7]  Maciej A Mazurowski,et al.  Algorithmic three-dimensional analysis of tumor shape in MRI improves prognosis of survival in glioblastoma: a multi-institutional study , 2017, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[8]  Lei Xing,et al.  Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: Development and Independent Validation on the Basis of Multiregion and Quantitative Analysis of MR Images. , 2016, Radiology.

[9]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Radiomic subtyping improves disease stratification beyond key molecular, clinical, and standard imaging characteristics in patients with glioblastoma , 2018, Neuro-oncology.

[10]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features , 2017, Scientific Data.

[11]  Mauricio Reyes,et al.  Fully automatic GBM segmentation in the TCGA-GBM dataset: Prognosis and correlation with VASARI features , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[12]  H. Aerts,et al.  Applications and limitations of radiomics , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Bastian Leibe,et al.  Full-Resolution Residual Networks for Semantic Segmentation in Street Scenes , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[14]  Bjoern H. Menze,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in brain tumor segmentation using CRFs and random perturbation models , 2016, 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[15]  Estanislao Arana,et al.  Glioblastoma: does the pre-treatment geometry matter? A postcontrast T1 MRI-based study , 2017, European Radiology.

[16]  Mauricio Reyes,et al.  Perturb-and-MPM: Quantifying Segmentation Uncertainty in Dense Multi-Label CRFs , 2017, ArXiv.

[17]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks with Bernoulli Approximate Variational Inference , 2015, ArXiv.