A framework for classifying and comparing distributed hillslope and catchment hydrologic models

[1] The term distributed model is widely applied to describe hydrologic models that can simulate broad classes of pathways of water through space, e.g., overland flow, saturated groundwater flow, and/or unsaturated flow in the vadose zone. Because existing distributed modeling approaches differ substantially from one another, we present a common framework from which to compare the many existing hillslope- and catchment-scale models. To provide a context for understanding the structure of the current generation of distributed models, we briefly review the history of hydrologic modeling. We define relevant modeling terms and describe common physical, analytical, and empirical approaches for representing hydrologic processes in the subsurface, surface, atmosphere, and biosphere. We then introduce criteria for classifying existing distributed models based on the nature of their process representation, solution scheme, coupling between the surface and subsurface, and treatment of space and time. On the basis of these criteria we describe 19 representative distributed models and discuss how process, scale, solution, and logistical considerations can be incorporated into model selection and application.

[1]  F. Holly,et al.  INVALIDITY OF PREISSMANN SCHEME FOR TRANSCRITICAL FLOW , 1997 .

[2]  P. Huyakorn,et al.  A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow , 2004 .

[3]  M J Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  V. Klemeš,et al.  Dilettantism in hydrology: Transition or destiny? , 1986 .

[5]  Wilfried Brutsaert,et al.  Hydrology: An Introduction , 2005 .

[6]  J. C. van Dam,et al.  Numerical simulation of infiltration, evaporation and shallow groundwater levels with the Richards equation , 2000 .

[7]  M. Kavvas On the coarse-graining of hydrologic processes with increasing scales , 1999 .

[8]  K. Beven Modeling preferential flow: an uncertain future? , 1991 .

[9]  A. W. Harbaugh MODFLOW-2005 : the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model--the ground-water flow process , 2005 .

[10]  David C. Goodrich,et al.  KINEROS: A kinematic runoff and erosion model documentation and user manual , 1986 .

[11]  C. Barnes,et al.  The art of catchment modeling: What is a good model? , 1995 .

[12]  F. Henderson Open channel flow , 1966 .

[13]  Hatim O. Sharif,et al.  On the calibration and verification of two‐dimensional, distributed, Hortonian, continuous watershed models , 2000 .

[14]  Theodore A. Endreny,et al.  Representing elevation uncertainty in runoff modelling and flowpath mapping , 2001 .

[15]  Bart Nijssen,et al.  The Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model , 2002 .

[16]  G. H. Leavesley,et al.  Precipitation-runoff modeling system; user's manual , 1983 .

[17]  Arthur W. Warrick,et al.  Environmental mechanics: water, mass and energy transfer in the biosphere. , 2002 .

[18]  Gary W. Parkin Unsaturated Zone Hydrology for Scientists and Engineers , 1999 .

[19]  R. D. Poshusta Error Analysis , 2019, Numerical Methods.

[20]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[21]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[22]  Keith Beven,et al.  Distributed Hydrological Modelling , 1998 .

[23]  J. Monteith Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[24]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  Spatial averaging of unsaturated flow equations under infiltration conditions over areally heterogeneous fields 2. Numerical simulations , 1994 .

[25]  Mario Putti,et al.  Newtonian nudging for a Richards equation-based distributed hydrological model , 2003 .

[26]  R. Clarke A review of some mathematical models used in hydrology, with observations on their calibration and use , 1973 .

[27]  Ezio Todini,et al.  Modelling of rainfall, flow and mass transport in hydrological systems: an overview , 1996 .

[28]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe Ecohydrology: A hydrologic perspective of climate‐soil‐vegetation dynamies , 2000 .

[29]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  EFFECT OF STORM RAINFALL INTENSITY PATTERNS ON SURFACE RUNOFF , 1988 .

[30]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Kinematic wave modeling in water resources , 1997 .

[31]  J. Vanderkwaak Numerical simulation of flow and chemical transport in integrated surface-subsurface hydrologic systems , 1999 .

[32]  W. Durner Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure , 1994 .

[33]  M. Celia,et al.  A General Mass-Conservative Numerical Solution for the Unsaturated Flow Equation , 1990 .

[34]  Russell S. Harmon,et al.  Theory, development, and applicability of the surface water hydrologic model CASC2D , 2002 .

[35]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  Calibration of a two-dimensional root water uptake model , 2001 .

[36]  Ezio Todini,et al.  TOPKAPI: a model for the representation of the rainfall‐runoff process at different scales , 2002 .

[37]  David R. Maidment,et al.  Watershed delineation with triangle-based terrain models , 1990 .

[38]  C. F. Izzard,et al.  The surface‐profile of overland‐flow , 1944 .

[39]  M. J. Hall,et al.  Rainfall-Runoff Modelling , 2004 .

[40]  M. Parlange,et al.  A geomorphology-based semi-distributed watershed model , 1999 .

[41]  M. Mariño,et al.  A COUPLED SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER FLOW MODEL , 2004 .

[42]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[43]  Fred L. Ogden,et al.  Green and Ampt Infiltration with Redistribution , 1997 .

[44]  K. Beven Kinematic subsurface stormflow , 1981 .

[45]  W. E. Hart,et al.  A critique of current methods in hydrologic systems investigation , 1964 .

[46]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[47]  E. Todini The ARNO rainfall-runoff model , 1996 .

[48]  K. Beven Searching for the Holy Grail of Scientific Hydrology: Qt= H(S?R?)A as closure , 2006 .

[49]  M. Wigmosta,et al.  A distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain , 1994 .

[50]  Jim Constantz,et al.  Field study and simulation of diurnal temperature effects on infiltration and variably saturated flow beneath an ephemeral stream , 1998 .

[51]  Keith Beven,et al.  Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system , 2002 .

[52]  D. A. Woolhiser,et al.  Infiltration Theory for Hydrologic Applications , 2002 .

[53]  H. Aksoy,et al.  Watershed Environmental Hydrology (WEHY) Model Based on Upscaled Conservation Equations: Hydrologic Module , 2004 .

[54]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  Unsteady, one‐dimensional flow over a plane—The rising hydrograph , 1967 .

[55]  Stephen J. Burges,et al.  An assessment of a conceptual rainfall‐runoff model's ability to represent the dynamics of small hypothetical catchments: 2. Hydrologic responses for normal and extreme rainfall , 1990 .

[56]  A. W. Harbaugh,et al.  Modifications to the diffusion analogy surface-water flow model (DAFLOW) for coupling to the modular finite-difference ground-water flow model (MODFLOW) , 1999 .

[57]  Edward R. Banta,et al.  A new streamflow-routing (SFR1) package to simulate stream-aquifer interaction with MODFLOW-2000 , 2004 .

[58]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): Motivation and experiment design , 2004 .

[59]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Validation of the energy budget of an alpine snowpack simulated by several snow models (Snow MIP project) , 2004, Annals of Glaciology.

[60]  Keith Beven,et al.  Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling , 1993 .

[61]  Fan Zhang,et al.  A First-Principle, Physics-Based Watershed Model: WASH123D , 2005 .

[62]  Keith Beven,et al.  Searching for the Holy Grail of scientific hydrology: Q t =( S, R, Δt ) A as closure , 2006 .

[63]  V. Singh,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Watershed Hydrology , 2002 .

[64]  Keith Beven,et al.  A Discussion of Distributed Hydrological Modelling , 1990 .

[65]  N. Crawford,et al.  DIGITAL SIMULATION IN HYDROLOGY' STANFORD WATERSHED MODEL 4 , 1966 .

[66]  T. Vogel,et al.  On the reliability of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity calculated from the moisture retention curve , 1988 .

[67]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Hydrological Science: model credibility and scientific integrity , 2001 .

[68]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  Search for physically based Runoff model : A hydrologic El Dorado ? , 1996 .

[69]  D. A. Woolhiser,et al.  KINEROS - a kinematic runoff and erosion model , 1995 .

[70]  Pierre Y. Julien,et al.  RASTER‐BASED HYDROLOGIC MODELING OF SPATIALLY‐VARIED SURFACE RUNOFF , 1995 .

[71]  K. Kosugi Lognormal Distribution Model for Unsaturated Soil Hydraulic Properties , 1996 .

[72]  D. Goodrich,et al.  KINEROS2 - a distributed kinematic runoff and erosion model , 2002 .

[73]  David R. Dawdy,et al.  Considerations involved in evaluating mathematical modeling of urban hydrologic systems , 1969 .

[74]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed , 1994 .

[75]  Edzer Pebesma,et al.  Error analysis for the evaluation of model performance: rainfall–runoff event time series data , 2005 .

[76]  Fred L. Ogden,et al.  GSSHA: Model To Simulate Diverse Stream Flow Producing Processes , 2004 .

[77]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  Unsteady one‐dimensional flow over a plane: Partial equilibrium and recession hydrographs , 1980 .

[78]  Keith Loague,et al.  Physics‐based hydrologic‐response simulation: Seeing through the fog of equifinality , 2006 .

[79]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[80]  Ira D. Sasowsky Model verification and documentation are needed , 2006 .

[81]  T. N. Narasimhan,et al.  Hydraulic characterization of aquifers, reservoir rocks, and soils: A history of ideas , 1998 .

[82]  Keith Beven,et al.  Dalton Medal Lecture: How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling? , 2001 .

[83]  D. Goodrich,et al.  Model For Rainfall Excess Patterns on Randomly Heterogeneous Areas , 2000 .

[84]  L. Kuchment,et al.  A distributed model of runoff generation in the permafrost regions , 2000 .

[85]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  The Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System - PRMS. , 1995 .

[86]  W. Brutsaert Evaporation into the atmosphere , 1982 .

[87]  John D. Hewlett,et al.  Non-Point and Diffused Water Sources: A Variable Source Area Problem , 1975 .

[88]  James C. I. Dooge,et al.  Looking for hydrologic laws , 1986 .

[89]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  One‐, two‐, and three‐dimensional root water uptake functions for transient modeling , 2001 .

[90]  K. Loague,et al.  Physics‐based hydrologic response simulation: platinum bridge, 1958 Edsel, or useful tool , 2004 .

[91]  D. E. Prudic,et al.  Documentation of the Unsaturated-Zone Flow (UZF1) Package for modeling Unsaturated Flow Between the Land Surface and the Water Table with MODFLOW-2005 , 2006 .

[92]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  The SHE/SHESED basin scale water flow and sediment transport modelling system. , 1995 .

[93]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff: 1. Base flow contributions to channel flow , 1972 .

[94]  R. H. Brooks,et al.  Hydraulic properties of porous media , 1963 .

[95]  K. Loague,et al.  Hydrologic‐Response simulations for the R‐5 catchment with a comprehensive physics‐based model , 2001 .

[96]  Rodger B. Grayson,et al.  Distributed parameter hydrologic modelling using vector elevation data: THALES and TAPES-C. , 1995 .

[97]  D. Hillel Environmental soil physics , 1998 .

[98]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Terminology, Modelling Protocol And Classification of Hydrological Model Codes , 1990 .

[99]  Christopher J. Duffy,et al.  A TWO-STATE INTEGRAL-BALANCE MODEL FOR SOIL MOISTURE AND GROUNDWATER DYNAMICS IN COMPLEX TERRAIN , 1996 .

[100]  D. Seo,et al.  Overall distributed model intercomparison project results , 2004 .

[101]  Richard G. Niswonger,et al.  Documentation of the Streamflow-Routing (SFR2) Package to Include Unsaturated Flow Beneath Streams - A Modification to SFR1 , 2005 .

[102]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 2: Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[103]  H. E. Jobson Evaporation Into the Atmosphere: Theory, History, and Applications , 1982 .

[104]  A M Weinberg,et al.  Science and trans-science , 1972, Science.

[105]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[106]  Mike Kirkby,et al.  Hillslope runoff processes and models , 1988 .

[107]  J. Bredehoeft The conceptualization model problem—surprise , 2005 .

[108]  M. Costa-Cabral,et al.  Digital Elevation Model Networks (DEMON): A model of flow over hillslopes for computation of contributing and dispersal areas , 1994 .

[109]  Dawen Yang,et al.  Comparison of different distributed hydrological models for characterization of catchment spatial variability , 2000 .

[110]  M. Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves I. Flood movement in long rivers , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[111]  G. Gottardi,et al.  A control-volume finite-element model for two-dimensional overland flow , 1993 .

[112]  D. Tarboton A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models , 1997 .

[113]  O. Palacios-Velez,et al.  Automated river-course, ridge and basin delineation from digital elevation data , 1986 .

[114]  T. Dunne,et al.  Effects of Rainfall, Vegetation, and Microtopography on Infiltration and Runoff , 1991 .

[115]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Physically based hydrologic modeling: 1. A terrain‐based model for investigative purposes , 1992 .

[116]  M. V. Genuchten,et al.  Review and comparison of models for describing non-equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in the vadose zone , 2003 .

[117]  Jaap Schellekens,et al.  Modelling of hydrological responses: the representative elementary watershed approach as an alternative blueprint for watershed modelling , 2003 .

[118]  M. Wigmosta,et al.  An adaptive modeling and monitoring approach to describe the hydrologic behavior of small catchments , 1997 .

[119]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[120]  Mark S. Wigmosta,et al.  A comparison of simplified methods for routing topographically driven subsurface flow , 1999 .

[121]  R. Feddes,et al.  Simulation of field water use and crop yield , 1978 .

[122]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Physically based hydrologic modeling: 2. Is the concept realistic? , 1992 .

[123]  M. Seyfried,et al.  Scale and the Nature of Spatial Variability: Field Examples Having Implications for Hydrologic Modeling , 1995 .

[124]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 1: History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[125]  R. Bras,et al.  A kinematic model of infiltration and runoff generation in layered and sloped soils , 1992 .

[126]  K. Loague,et al.  Simulating hydrological response for the R‐5 catchment: comparison of two models and the impact of the roads , 2002 .

[127]  E. Todini Rainfall-runoff modeling — Past, present and future , 1988 .

[128]  Florisa Melone,et al.  Modeling infiltration for multistorm runoff events , 1993 .

[129]  R. L. Johnson,et al.  User's guide to the Variably Saturated Flow (VSF) process to MODFLOW , 2006 .

[130]  David R. Dawdy,et al.  Mathematical Models of Catchment Behavior , 1965 .

[131]  Nicole M. Gasparini,et al.  An object-oriented framework for distributed hydrologic and geomorphic modeling using triangulated irregular networks , 2001 .

[132]  W. Green,et al.  Studies on Soil Phyics. , 1911, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[133]  Daniel Hillel,et al.  Applications of soil physics , 1980 .

[134]  Benjamin B. Mirus,et al.  Physics‐based hydrologic‐response simulation: foundation for hydroecology and hydrogeomorphology , 2006 .

[135]  R. Freeze,et al.  Blueprint for a physically-based, digitally-simulated hydrologic response model , 1969 .

[136]  Dennis P. Lettenmaier,et al.  Variable infiltration capacity cold land process model updates , 2003 .

[137]  M. Th. van Genuchten,et al.  Convective-dispersive transport of solutes involved in sequential first-order decay reactions , 1985 .

[138]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[139]  D. B. Simons,et al.  Applicability of kinematic and diffusion models. , 1978 .

[140]  Alvin M. Weinberg,et al.  Science and trans-science. , 1972 .

[141]  G. Ampt,et al.  Studies on Soil Physics: Part II — The Permeability of an Ideal Soil to Air and Water , 1912, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[142]  Keith Beven,et al.  Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling , 1988 .

[143]  Keith Beven,et al.  The Institute of Hydrology distributed model , 1987 .

[144]  J. Monteith,et al.  Principles of Environmental Physics , 2014 .

[145]  E. Vivoni,et al.  Catchment hydrologic response with a fully distributed triangulated irregular network model , 2004 .

[146]  Stephen J. Burges,et al.  Trends and directions in hydrology , 1986 .