Intraoperative pathology consultation: error, cause and impact.

BACKGROUND Correlation of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis with final diagnosis can be an important component of an institution's quality assurance process. METHODS We performed a quality assurance review of 1207 frozen section diagnoses from 812 surgical cases performed in the Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Programme during a 6-month period in 2007. We reviewed the frozen section and permanent slides from all potentially discordant cases using a multiheaded microscope to arrive at a consensus pertaining to the type and reason for error. We reviewed the clinical record to determine whether there had been a potential adverse impact on immediate clinical management. RESULTS Frozen sections were most commonly requested for head and neck, nervous system and female genital tract specimens. Twenty-eight frozen sections (3%) were deferred. We identified 24 discordant diagnoses involving 3% of cases and 2% of specimens. The organ systems showing the greatest frequency of discordance relative to the total number from that system were the nervous system, head and neck, and the lungs. Of the errors identified, most occurred owing to diagnostic misinterpretation, followed by problems related to tissue sampling. There was a potential adverse impact on immediate clinical management in 14 cases. CONCLUSION Our results add to the Canadian data on the correlation between frozen sections and permanent sections; we note comparability to the concordance rates reported in the literature.

[1]  L. Ackerman,et al.  Ackerman's surgical pathology , 1974 .

[2]  D. Lowe,et al.  Recent advances in histopathology , 1978 .

[3]  E. Klatt,et al.  Accuracy of frozen-section diagnosis in a teaching hospital. , 1987, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[4]  S. Silverberg,et al.  Intraoperative Pathologic Consultation: An Audit of 1,000 Recent Consecutive Cases , 1989, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[5]  P. J. Howanitz,et al.  The accuracy of frozen-section diagnoses in 34 hospitals. , 1990, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[6]  P J Howanitz,et al.  Interinstitutional comparison of frozen-section consultation. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probe study of 79,647 consultations in 297 North American institutions. , 1991, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[7]  P. Donisi [Problems and limitations of frozen section diagnosis. A review of 470 consecutive cases]. , 1991, Pathologica.

[8]  Donisi Pm Problems and limitations of frozen section diagnosis. A review of 470 consecutive cases , 1991 .

[9]  N. Nemoto,et al.  [A study of intraoperative rapid frozen section diagnosis focusing on accuracy and quality assessment]. , 1992, Rinsho byori. The Japanese journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  R. Gandour-Edwards,et al.  Clinical utility of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis in head and neck surgery: A quality assurance perspective , 1993, Head & neck.

[11]  S. Hasan,et al.  Intraoperative frozen section consultation: an analysis of accuracy in a teaching hospital. , 1993, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[12]  W. Choi,et al.  Intraoperative Pathologic Consultation , 1993 .

[13]  L. Kliemann,et al.  [Transoperative anatomopathologic examinations: quality control]. , 1994, Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira.

[14]  Cerski Ct,et al.  [Transoperative anatomopathologic examinations: quality control]. , 1994 .

[15]  G. Gardini,et al.  [Quality control of intraoperative diagnosis. Annual review of 1490 frozen sections]. , 1994, Pathologica.

[16]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in surgical pathology: review of a 1-year experience with 24,880 cases at Mayo Clinic Rochester. , 1995, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[17]  R. Zarbo,et al.  Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultations. A college of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 90,538 cases in 461 institutions. , 1996, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[18]  V. Eusebi,et al.  [Quality control of intraoperative diagnosis]. , 1996, Pathologica.

[19]  R. Zarbo,et al.  Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultation in small hospitals: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 18,532 frozen section consultation diagnoses in 233 small hospitals. , 1996, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[20]  G. Collina,et al.  [Quality control in pathological anatomy: 10 years' experience]. , 2003, Pathologica.

[21]  D. Wendum,et al.  [Quality assessment of intraoperative frozen sections in a teaching hospital: an analysis of 847 consecutive cases]. , 2003, Annales de pathologie.

[22]  J. Khoo An audit of intraoperative frozen section in Johor. , 2004, The Medical journal of Malaysia.

[23]  F. Altaf Audit of breast frozen sections , 2004, Annals of Saudi medicine.

[24]  R. Nakhleh,et al.  Recommendations for Quality Assurance and Improvement in Surgical and Autopsy Pathology , 2006, American journal of clinical pathology.

[25]  Rhona J. Souers,et al.  The value of monitoring frozen section-permanent section correlation data over time. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[26]  Z. Ahmad,et al.  Correlation of intra-operative frozen section consultation with the final diagnosis at a referral center in Karachi, Pakistan. , 2008, Indian journal of pathology & microbiology.

[27]  M. Trotter,et al.  Intraoperative consultation/final diagnosis correlation: relationship to tissue type and pathologic process. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[28]  S. Petersen,et al.  Intraoperative Consultation as an Instrument of Quality Management , 2008, World Journal of Surgery.

[29]  R. Prayson,et al.  Frozen section discrepancy in the evaluation of nonneoplastic central nervous system samples. , 2009, Annals of diagnostic pathology.

[30]  S. Nofech-Mozes,et al.  Intraoperative Consultation in Gynecologic Pathology: A 6-Year Audit at a Tertiary Care Medical Center , 2009, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[31]  Shalinee Rao,et al.  Challenges in neurosurgical intraoperative consultation. , 2009, Neurology India.

[32]  T. Cil,et al.  Intraoperative Consultation for Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: An 8-Year Audit , 2010, International journal of surgical pathology.