Fluency of consumption imagery and the backfire effects of imagery appeals

Existing research and widespread commercial usage suggest that appeals urging consumers to imagine the product experience have powerful effects on product preferences. Three studies examined the mediating role of imagery accessibility and demonstrated that the difficulty of imagery generation can reverse the generally observed positive effects of imagery appeals. When participants were low in imagery abilities or when the product was not presented in a vivid way, imagery appeals were not only ineffective but even had a negative effect on product preferences. Providing evidence for its subjective nature, this imagery fluency effect was more likely for individuals attuned to their internal experiences.

[1]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Imagining Can Heighten or Lower the Perceived Likelihood of Contracting a Disease , 1985 .

[2]  Rongrong Zhou,et al.  Beyond the Obvious: Chronic Vividness of Imagery and the Use of Information in Decision Making. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[3]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions , 1987 .

[4]  N. Schwarz.  Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[5]  B. Uttl,et al.  Measurement of Individual Differences , 2005, Psychological science.

[6]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  Vividness Effects: A Resource-Matching Perspective , 1997 .

[7]  J. Carroll.  The Effect of Imagining an Event on Expectations for the Event: An Interpretation in Terms of the Availability Heuristic. , 1978 .

[8]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Information Accessibility as a Moderator of Judgments: The Role of Content versus Retrieval Ease , 2005 .

[9]  T. Brock,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology the Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives Text Quality Individual Differences and Situational Influences Transportation Scale Items Gender Differences Discriminant Validation: Need for Cognition Effect of Text Manipulation Beli , 2022 .

[10]  Michaela Wänke,et al.  There Are Many Reasons to Drive a BMW: Does Imagined Ease of Argument Generation Influence Attitudes? , 1997 .

[11]  P. Bone,et al.  The Generation and Consequences of Communication-evoked Imagery , 1992 .

[12]  Punam Anand,et al.  The Effect of Vivid Attributes on the Evaluation of Alternatives: The Role of Differential Attention and Cognitive Elaboration , 1989 .

[13]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Jennifer Edson Escalas.  IMAGINE YOURSELF IN THE PRODUCT : Mental Simulation, Narrative Transportation, and Persuasion , 2004 .

[15]  B. Sternthal,et al.  Detecting and Explaining Vividness Effects in Attitudinal Judgments , 1984 .

[16]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Self-Relevant Scenarios as Mediators of Likelihood Estimates and Compliance: Does Imagining Make It So? , 1982 .

[17]  D. Kieras.  Beyond pictures and words: Alternative information-processing models for imagery effect in verbal memory , 1978 .

[18]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual Versus Verbal Information Processing , 1985 .

[19]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation , 2004 .

[20]  Montague Ullman.  The Role of Imagery , 1975 .

[21]  Punam Anand Keller,et al.  Differences in the relative influence of product attributes under alternative processing conditions: Attribute importance versus attribute ease of imagability , 1994 .

[22]  M. Scheier,et al.  Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. , 1975 .

[23]  Dennis W. Rook.  The Buying Impulse , 1987 .

[24]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Evaluating persuasion-enhancing techniques from a resource-matching perspective , 1997 .

[25]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[26]  D. F. Marks,et al.  Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[27]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Examining the Vividness Controversy: An Availability-Valence Interpretation , 1986 .

[28]  Alvin C. Burns,et al.  Effects of Print Ad Pictures and Copy Containing Instructions to Imagine on Mental Imagery That Mediates Attitudes , 1997 .

[29]  Joel Huber,et al.  The Impact of Anticipating Satisfaction on Consumer Choice , 2000 .