Shared situational awareness and information quality in disaster management

Abstract The importance of timely and accurate information for the relevant actors in disaster response is essential. Disaster response efforts are based on relevant facts concerning the situation at hand. The relevant information alone is not sufficient if the quality of that information does not meet the needs. Quality literature focuses mainly on the producer point of view of quality or the information systems perspective of quality. There is a need for a broader approach that combines the information needs in certain contexts with different aspects of information quality. The research presented in this paper suggests a method for defining the critical information and the relevant information quality elements that is required to build the SSA in disaster response. The method can be used for improving the performance and shared situational awareness required for the response operation by finding the essential information quality needs and gaps.

[1]  John R. Harrald,et al.  Shared Situational Awareness in Emergency Management Mitigation and Response , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[2]  James R. Evans,et al.  The management and control of quality , 1989 .

[3]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Designing for Situation Awareness : An Approach to User-Centered Design , 2003 .

[4]  Tomas Robert,et al.  Data Quality in INSPIRE: Balancing Legal Obligation with Technical Aspects , 2013 .

[5]  E. Quarantelli DISASTER CRISIS MANAGEMENT: A SUMMARY OF RESEARCH FINDINGS , 1988 .

[6]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The credibility of volunteered geographic information , 2008 .

[7]  Barrie Dale,et al.  Total quality management: origins and evolution of the term , 1998 .

[8]  Felix Naumann,et al.  Assessment Methods for Information Quality Criteria , 2000, IQ.

[9]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Quality information and knowledge , 1998 .

[10]  Robert Jeansoulin,et al.  Fundamentals of Spatial Data Quality , 2006 .

[11]  Walter L. Perry,et al.  Exploring Information Superiority , 2004 .

[12]  Kirsi Virrantaus,et al.  Expanding The Situation Picture For The Decision Maker With Geographic Information , 2007 .

[13]  John Piggott,et al.  Situational awareness and safety , 2001 .

[14]  P. Mouncey Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality , 2001 .

[15]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Sisi Zlatanova,et al.  A data model for operational and situational information in emergency response , 2010, Applied Geomatics.

[17]  Carol Reeves,et al.  DEFINING QUALITY: ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS , 1994 .

[18]  L. Comfort,et al.  Coordination in Rapidly Evolving Disaster Response Systems , 2004 .

[19]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  Identifying and confirming information and system quality requirements for multi-agency disaster management , 2009 .

[20]  Kirsi Virrantaus,et al.  Developing shared situational awareness for emergency management , 2013 .

[21]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Coordination during multi‐agency emergency response: issues and solutions , 2011 .

[22]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[23]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises , 2010, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[24]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Martin J. Eppler Managing Information Quality , 2003 .

[26]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Effectiveness of Net-Centric Support Tools for Traffic Incident Management - Results of a field experiment , 2013 .