QAOA-based Fair Sampling on NISQ Devices

We study the status of fair sampling on Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, in particular the IBM Q family of backends. Using the recently introduced Grover Mixer-QAOA algorithm for discrete optimization, we generate fair sampling circuits to solve six problems of varying difficulty, each with several optimal solutions, which we then run on ten different backends available on the IBM Q system. For a given circuit evaluated on a specific set of qubits, we evaluate: how frequently the qubits return an optimal solution to the problem, the fairness with which the qubits sample from all optimal solutions, and the reported hardware error rate of the qubits. To quantify fairness, we define a novel metric based on Pearson’s χ test. We find that fairness is relatively high for circuits with small and large error rates, but drops for circuits with medium error rates. This indicates that structured errors dominate in this regime, while unstructured errors, which are random and thus inherently fair, dominate in noisier qubits and longer circuits. Our results provide a simple, intuitive means of quantifying fairness in quantum circuits, and show that reducing structured errors is necessary to improve fair sampling on NISQ hardware. †Corresponding author: golden@lanl.gov ar X iv :2 10 1. 03 25 8v 1 [ qu an tph ] 8 J an 2 02 1

[1]  H. Nishimori,et al.  Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model , 1998, cond-mat/9804280.

[2]  Rupak Biswas,et al.  From the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm to a Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz , 2017, Algorithms.

[3]  John C. Platt,et al.  Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor , 2019, Nature.

[4]  Lov K. Grover,et al.  Fixed-point quantum search. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[5]  Jacob Biamonte,et al.  Variational learning of Grover's quantum search algorithm , 2018, Physical Review A.

[6]  Andrew J. Ochoa,et al.  Uncertain fate of fair sampling in quantum annealing , 2018, Physical Review A.

[7]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Validating quantum computers using randomized model circuits , 2018, Physical Review A.

[8]  M. Sipser,et al.  Quantum Computation by Adiabatic Evolution , 2000, quant-ph/0001106.

[9]  E. Farhi,et al.  A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm Applied to a Bounded Occurrence Constraint Problem , 2014, 1412.6062.

[10]  Stephan Eidenbenz,et al.  The Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz on Maximum k-Vertex Cover , 2019, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE).

[11]  C. Nehrkorn,et al.  Achieving fair sampling in quantum annealing , 2020, 2007.08487.

[12]  R. Blume-Kohout,et al.  Measuring the capabilities of quantum computers , 2020, Nature Physics.

[13]  Ellis Wilson,et al.  Just-in-time Quantum Circuit Transpilation Reduces Noise , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE).

[14]  B. Zhang,et al.  Advantages of Unfair Quantum Ground-State Sampling , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Velimir V. Vesselinov,et al.  Aquifer structure identification using stochastic inversion , 2008 .

[16]  Theodore J. Yoder,et al.  Fixed-point quantum search with an optimal number of queries. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[17]  H. Katzgraber,et al.  Ground-state statistics from annealing algorithms: quantum versus classical approaches , 2009 .

[18]  W. Lechner,et al.  Programmable superpositions of Ising configurations , 2017, Physical Review A.

[19]  E. Rieffel,et al.  XY mixers: Analytical and numerical results for the quantum alternating operator ansatz , 2020 .

[20]  H. Katzgraber,et al.  Exponentially Biased Ground-State Sampling of Quantum Annealing Machines with Transverse-Field Driving Hamiltonians. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[21]  S. Eidenbenz,et al.  Grover Mixers for QAOA: Shifting Complexity from Mixer Design to State Preparation , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE).

[22]  E. Farhi,et al.  A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm , 2014, 1411.4028.

[23]  Helmut G. Katzgraber,et al.  Quantum annealing for problems with ground-state degeneracy , 2008 .

[24]  Kazuyuki Tanaka,et al.  Fair Sampling by Simulated Annealing on Quantum Annealer , 2019, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan.

[25]  Daniel O'Malley An approach to quantum-computational hydrologic inverse analysis , 2018, Scientific Reports.