Biologically inspired crack trapping for enhanced adhesion

We present a synthetic adaptation of the fibrillar adhesion surfaces found in nature. The structure consists of protruding fibrils topped by a thin plate and shows an experimentally measured enhancement in adhesion energy of up to a factor of 9 over a flat control. Additionally, this structure solves the robustness problems of previous mimic structures and has preferred contact properties (i.e., a large surface area and a highly compliant structure). We show that this geometry enhances adhesion because of its ability to trap interfacial cracks in highly compliant contact regimes between successive fibril detachments. This results in the requirement that the externally supplied energy release rate for interfacial separation be greater than the intrinsic work of adhesion, in a manner analogous to lattice trapping of cracks in crystalline solids.

[1]  J. A. Peterson,et al.  Convergent and Alternative Designs in the Digital Adhesive Pads of Scincid Lizards , 1982, Science.

[2]  Y. Jiao,et al.  Adhesion measured on the attachment pads of Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera, insecta). , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  The design of the fly adhesive pad: distal tenent setae are adapted to the delivery of an adhesive secretion , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Robert N. Fisher,et al.  A comparative analysis of clinging ability among pad‐bearing lizards , 1996 .

[5]  S. Gorb.  Attachment Devices of Insect Cuticle , 2001, Springer Netherlands.

[6]  A. Jagota,et al.  Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 2. Mechanics of enhanced adhesion , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[7]  Tian Tang,et al.  Can a fibrillar interface be stronger and tougher than a non-fibrillar one? , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[8]  K. Autumn,et al.  Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  John R. Rice,et al.  Thermodynamics of the quasi-static growth of Griffith cracks , 1978 .

[10]  R. Ruibal,et al.  The structure of the digital setae of lizards , 1965, Journal of morphology.

[11]  S. Gorb,et al.  Ultrastructural architecture and mechanical properties of attachment pads in Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera Tettigoniidae) , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  L. Mahadevan,et al.  Peeling from a biomimetically patterned thin elastic film , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  K. Kendall.  Control of cracks by interfaces in composites , 1975, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[14]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Biologically inspired polymer microfibers with spatulate tips as repeatable fibrillar adhesives , 2006 .

[15]  S. Gorb,et al.  WHEN LESS IS MORE: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR TENACITY ENHANCEMENT BY DIVISION OF CONTACT AREA , 2004 .

[16]  Hiroshi Tada,et al.  The stress analysis of cracks handbook , 2000 .

[17]  S. Gorb,et al.  Evolution of locomotory attachment pads of hexapods , 2001, Naturwissenschaften.

[18]  J. Dear,et al.  The calculation of adhesive fracture energies from double-cantilever beam test specimens , 1991 .

[19]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[20]  Stanislav Gorb,et al.  Biological microtribology: anisotropy in frictional forces of orthopteran attachment pads reflects the ultrastructure of a highly deformable material , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  T. Eisner,et al.  Defense by foot adhesion in a beetle (Hemisphaerota cyanea). , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Ralph Spolenak,et al.  Resolving the nanoscale adhesion of individual gecko spatulae by atomic force microscopy , 2005, Biology Letters.

[23]  Renu Addlakha.  Ethical quandaries in anthropological fieldwork in psychiatric settings. , 2005, Indian journal of medical ethics.

[24]  Bo N. J. Persson,et al.  On the mechanism of adhesion in biological systems , 2003 .

[25]  A B Kesel,et al.  Adhesion measurements on the attachment devices of the jumping spider Evarcha arcuata , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[26]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Shape insensitive optimal adhesion of nanoscale fibrillar structures. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Ralph Spolenak,et al.  Evidence for capillarity contributions to gecko adhesion from single spatula nanomechanical measurements. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  A. Jagota,et al.  Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 1. Making contact , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[29]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  U Hiller.  Comparative Studies on the Functional Morphology of 2 Gekkonid Lizards , 1976 .

[31]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  Synthetic gecko foot-hair micro/nano-structures as dry adhesives , 2003 .

[32]  S. Gorb,et al.  Biomimetic mushroom-shaped fibrillar adhesive microstructure , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[33]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Mechanics of hierarchical adhesion structures of geckos , 2005 .

[34]  Robb Thomson,et al.  Lattice Trapping of Fracture Cracks , 1971 .

[35]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  A comparison of the adhesive setae on the feet of lizards and arthropods , 1983 .

[36]  A. Crosby,et al.  Controlling polymer adhesion with "pancakes". , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.